Year: 2013

Tampa Bay Buccaneers: 2013 Week 3 NFL Power Rankings (#26)

stevenlourie 2013 NFL Power Rankings, 2013 Week 3 NFL Power Rankings, Buccaneers, Uncategorized

Last week: 24

The Buccaneers kept it close at home with the Saints, but it took a Drew Brees pick six and a very strong defensive performance to do so. Josh Freeman once again contributed nothing positive, completing 9 of 22 for 125 yards, 1 touchdown, and an interception. He’s now completed 131 of 262 (50.0%) for 1639 yards (6.3 YPA), 8 touchdowns, and 12 interceptions in his last 7 games, dating back to last season and with all the negative reports about him and his relationship with his Head Coach and teammate, it seems highly unlikely he lasts the season as the starter and is retained this off-season as a free agent. This week, the Buccaneers have another tough test in New England, likely without the suspended Dashon Goldson and look on their way to wasting what’s otherwise a talented roster.

Week 2 Studs

LT Donald Penn

LOLB Lavonte David

Week 2 Duds

RE Adrian Clayborn

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Buffalo Bills: 2013 Week 3 NFL Power Rankings (#27)

stevenlourie 2013 NFL Power Rankings, 2013 Week 3 NFL Power Rankings, Bills, Uncategorized

Last week: 27

The Bills beat the Panthers at home mostly because the Panthers ran out of healthy defensive backs on their final drive and physically could not play sub packages against a team clearly in pass mode. However, it wasn’t an unimpressive game. Of the Panthers’ 9 losses last season, 4 came by a touchdown or less against 8+ win teams and they also barely lost to the Seahawks week 1. The Bills probably aren’t in that group talent wise, but it wasn’t an unimpressive win.

Week 2 Studs

WR Steve Johnson

LT Cordy Glenn

RE Kyle Williams

ROLB Mario Williams

Week 2 Duds

QB EJ Manuel

LG Colin Brown

ROLB Jerry Hughes

RE Corbin Bryant

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Minnesota Vikings: 2013 Week 3 NFL Power Rankings (#28)

stevenlourie 2013 NFL Power Rankings, 2013 Week 3 NFL Power Rankings, Uncategorized, Vikings

Last week: 25

On paper, almost beating the Bears is Chicago looks impressive, but consider that the Vikings lost despite winning the turnover battle, which only happens about 21% of the time. Christian Ponder didn’t have a bad game, completing 16 of 30 for 227 yards, a touchdown, and an interception and he probably kept Matt Cassel at bay for another week, after it was reported before the game that the Vikings were closer to benching him than you’d think. However, he still needed 123 yards on the ground and two return touchdowns to even keep this one close. My guess is he doesn’t finish the season as the starter if the Vikings are already considering Cassel. It’ll be interesting to see if they go quarterback early in the first round. Johnny Manziel might want to consider getting to know the frat party scene in Minneapolis.

Week 2 Studs

WR Greg Jennings

RT Phil Loadholt

RG Brandon Fusco

C John Sullivan

TE Kyle Rudolph

RE Jared Allen

LE Brian Robison

Week 2 Duds

SS Jamarca Sanford

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

New York Jets: 2013 Week 3 NFL Power Rankings (#29)

stevenlourie 2013 NFL Power Rankings, 2013 Week 3 NFL Power Rankings, Jets, Uncategorized

Last week: 29

It’s really early, but the Jets have the best defense in the NFL, by far, in terms of preventing their opponent from moving the chains. They’ve allowed just 51.2% of first and 10s to be converted for a subsequent first down. Getting Tampa Bay week 1 and then a Thursday Night Game in the rain week 2 definitely helps, but you have to be impressed with how their defense played against the Patriots last week, even if Tom Brady was working with arguably the worst receiving corps of his career that night. Nose tackle Damon Harrison and middle linebackers Demario Davis have been breakout stars through 2 weeks. If only the offense could do anything.

Week 2 Studs

LG Vladimir Ducaase

DT Damon Harrison

RE Leger Douzable

Week 2 Duds

QB Geno Smith

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Cleveland Browns: 2013 Week 3 NFL Power Rankings (#30)

stevenlourie 2013 NFL Power Rankings, 2013 Week 3 NFL Power Rankings, Browns, Uncategorized

Last week: 30

The Browns’ offensive line was supposed to be one of the better offensive lines in the NFL, but the right side has gotten completely blown up through the first 2 games. Right guard Oneil Cousins has been as bad as a player can possibly be in 2 starts as an injury fill in, while right tackle Mitchell Schwartz, coming off a very strong rookie year, has already given up as many sacks in 2 games as he did all last season. The good news is that Shawn Lauvao is expected to return from injury this week. Lauvao isn’t very good and would have been the weak link on this line regardless, but he’ll be miles better than Cousins. Hopefully his return can spur a turnaround for Schwartz. The Browns also add Josh Gordon back from suspension, who gives them a much needed weapon on the outside if he can come back and play at the level he’s capable of. Both of those returns are just in time for a winnable game at 0-2 Minnesota.

Week 2 Studs

ROLB Jabaal Sheard

Week 2 Duds

RT Mitchell Schwartz

RG Oniel Cousins

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Oakland Raiders: 2013 Week 3 NFL Power Rankings (#31)

stevenlourie 2013 NFL Power Rankings, 2013 Week 3 NFL Power Rankings, Raiders, Uncategorized

Last week: 32

The Raiders won the total bowl last week. I originally had the Raiders winning just 1 game all season, week 2 at home for Jacksonville, but they have impressed me more than I’ve expected so far this season. Terrelle Pryor has faced two of the worst defenses in the NFL in his 2 starts, but he’s led this team to 6 times as many first downs as punts this season. Of course, life will get harder for him when Darren McFadden (36/171/1) suffers his annual injury, but I’m interested to see this team play tougher competiton. If the Raiders can keep it competitive with the Broncos this week, they’ll be moving up.

Week 2 Studs

LT Khalif Barnes

RE Lamarr Houston

CB Mike Jenkins

Week 2 Duds

WR Denarius Moore

LG Lucas Nix

TE Jermon Bushrod

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Jacksonville Jaguars: 2013 Week 3 NFL Power Rankings (#32)

stevenlourie 2013 NFL Power Rankings, 2013 Week 3 NFL Power Rankings, Jaguars, Uncategorized

Last week: 31

The Jaguars are the obvious pick as the worst team in the NFL after losing to the Raiders. Fortunately, the prize is a franchise quarterback like Teddy Bridgewater. The Jaguars need someone like that badly. Chad Henne is better than Blaine Gabbert, but only by default and after amassing barely over 100 yards of total offense before garbage time against the Raiders, the Jaguars have a chance to be historically bad offensively and it could get even worse if the start turning the ball over (only 2 turnovers in their first 2 games). Things might get better as Justin Blackmon and Marcedes Lewis return, but probably not much. Rookie right tackle Luke Joeckel has not been the instant contributor they were expecting him to be as the 2nd overall pick has struggled thus far in his career, possibly because he’s playing in an unfamiliar position at right tackle.

Week 2 Studs

None

Week 2 Duds

RB Jordan Todman

LT Eugene Monroe

LG Will Rackley

RE Jason Babin

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Houston Texans at Baltimore Ravens: 2013 Week 3 NFL Pick

stevenlourie 2013 NFL Picks, 2013 Week 3 NFL Picks, Ravens, Texans, Uncategorized

Houston Texans (2-0) at Baltimore Ravens (1-1)

The Ravens have been one of the premier home teams in the NFL over the past few seasons, going 24-3 at home since 2010. As a result, they’ve only been underdogs at home a grand total of twice in that time frame, losing once at home to Peyton Manning and the Broncos last season and then winning once at home as dogs last year against the Giants, after they had previously lost 3 straight. Given that, I don’t think the Texans deserve to be favored in Baltimore.

The Texans have not played well thus far this year, barely beating both Tennessee and San Diego. They won 12 games last year, but were not nearly as good as that would have suggested. Their Pythagorean Expectation was that of a 10 win team as they went 5-0 in games decided by a touchdown or less. They also faced a very easy schedule, recovered an unsustainable high percentage of fumbles that hit the ground, and played their worst football down the stretch, which might have carried over somewhat into this season. They finished last year 11th in overall DVOA and 19th in weighted DVOA, which puts a higher weight on their later games.

That’s not the type of team that deserves to be favored in Baltimore, especially since left tackle Duane Brown, one of the best in the NFL, probably won’t play. Ray Rice, meanwhile, won’t suit up for the Ravens, but it’s much easier to replace him with talented backup Bernard Pierce than to replace one of the game’s premier blindside protectors with Derek Newton.

The trends also favor the Ravens. They are home dogs here before being road favorites next week in Buffalo. Teams are 55-34 ATS since 2002 in that situation. Meanwhile, the Texans are road favorites before being home dogs next week when Seattle comes to town. Teams are 37-62 ATS in that situation since 1989 as long as the game is non-divisional.

Put it all together and you get that teams are 6-2 ATS since 1989 as home dogs before being road favorites when their opponent will next be home dogs. I know it’s a very small sample size, but I think the fact that this is only the 9th time this situation has happened in 24 years is telling. The Ravens will be completely focused on this game, while the Texans could be caught looking forward to what they might see as a Super Bowl preview against Seattle next week. There’s a very good chance that Baltimore takes advantage and wins at home. They’re a great home team and Houston is a comparable, but not superior opponent.

Baltimore Ravens 23 Houston Texans 17 Upset Pick +115

Pick against spread: Baltimore +2.5

Confidence: Pick of the Week

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Cleveland Browns at Minnesota Vikings: 2013 Week 3 NFL Pick

stevenlourie 2013 NFL Picks, 2013 Week 3 NFL Picks, Browns, Uncategorized, Vikings

Cleveland Browns (0-2) at Minnesota Vikings (0-2)

This line has had tremendous line movement this week, going from -3.5 at the beginning of the week to -7 now. That’s significant as 23% of NFL games are decided by between 4-7 points. Why such a big shift? Well, Brandon Weeden has been ruled out with injury and Trent Richardson has been traded. However, I’m not sure losing Weeden is such a big deal. He’s completed just 54.7% of his passes for an average of 6.0 YPA, 1 touchdown, and 3 interceptions while leading the Browns to a grand total of 16 points through 2 games.

Brian Hoyer could completely bomb, but he also completed 56.6% of his passes for an average of 6.2 YPA, 1 touchdown, and 2 interceptions last season against Chicago and San Francisco, two of the better defenses in the NFL. I think it’s highly unlikely he’s a significant downgrade from Weeden. If anything, he could be better with Josh Gordon returning from suspension. Gordon was fantastic last season considering his quarterback situation, that he was rookie, and that he hadn’t really played football in 2 years. He caught 50 passes for 805 yards and 5 touchdowns on 89 targets and 506 routes run (1.58 yards per route run). Browns quarterbacks had a 90.9 QB rating when throwing to him, over 18 points better than their overall QB rating.

Richardson’s loss is bigger. He’s been one of the most elusive backs in the NFL over his first two years in the league in terms of breaking tackles and picking up yards after first contact, but from a production standpoint, his 3.5 career YPC isn’t going to be that hard to replace, especially if they get better offensive line play. Billed as one of the sneaky good offensive lines in the NFL coming in the season, the Browns’ offensive line has definitely struggled thus far this season, but they will have all 5 starters healthy this week for the first time all season.

There’s really no reason why the Vikings should be favored by a whole touchdown over them, but the public is so scared off of them. That’s giving us line value. The Vikings should not really be favored by a whole touchdown over anyone, except probably Jacksonville. They are one of eight 0-2 teams, but their problems go deeper than that. Their week 1 loss by 10 points was just one of 4 games decided by more than a touchdown that week, one of 10 decided by more than a touchdown so far this season. They could have lost by a lot more considering they were outgained 28 to 16 in first downs and 467 to 330 in total yards. Last week, they only lost by one, but they did so despite winning the turnover battle, which only happens about 21% of the time. They can rely on that going forward.

Overall on the season, they are converting just 68.6% of 1st and 10s for a subsequent set of downs, as opposed to 78.8% for their opponents, a differential that is 28th in the NFL ahead of only these Browns (who aren’t far behind them at 29th), Tampa Bay, Pittsburgh, and Jacksonville. I had them winning just 5 games at the beginning of the season and they have shown me no reason to change that prediction. Given that, they do not deserve to be favored by a touchdown here.

One of the most powerful trends in betting is known as the six and six trend, meaning teams who finish with 6 wins or fewer are 25-69 ATS as favorites of 6 or more since 2002. There are two issues with this trend. One, it’s very rare (it only happened 7 times all last season, going 2-5 ATS). Two, it’s even rarer that a situation will come up in which you can confidently use the trend. The Eagles were 8.5 point favorites in Cleveland last year week1 (they didn’t cover), but there was at the time there was no way to know that the Eagles would finish 6-10 or worse. The Vikings may or may not finish with that poor of a record, but that trend is still relevant to this game.

They’re also in a rough situation playing their home opener during week 3. Since 1989, teams that have played their week 3 game at home after starting the season with back to back road games are just 20-40 ATS. Starting the year on the road like that takes so much out of you and they could also coast now that they’re at home, especially since they have an easier opponent. They could have a very hard time focusing at home for the lowly non-conference Browns after playing tough games in Detroit and Chicago, both divisional foes. After this game, they play in London against the Steelers. They could be looking forward to that.

There is also another trend that favors the Browns. They are road dogs after a road loss, a situation teams are 88-52 ATS since 2008 and have historically covered in about 65% of the time, no matter what year you use to cut off your sample. I like Cleveland a good deal to cover this week, especially with all of the close games that have happened early on this season. Their defense should make this one tight and I really don’t trust Christian Ponder to cover this big of a spread.

Minnesota Vikings 17 Cleveland Browns 16

Pick against spread: Cleveland +7

Confidence: High

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Why The Redskins Should Not Change Their Name

stevenlourie Commanders, Uncategorized

Arguably the biggest social debate in the NFL is the one surrounding the controversy over the Washington Redskins’ name. An old and once dead debate has been brought to the forefront in recent months, thanks to everything from journalists and media networks refusing to refer to the Redskins by their name to even 10 members of congress sending letters to the NFL about the subject.

The controversy is over the fact that the word “Redskin” is traditionally a racial slur used against Native Americans. However, in today’s world, the word is much more commonly associated with the football team than the slur. Words change their meaning over time, largely for cultural reasons. For instance, the word “faggot” has been culturally defined as everything from a slur against women, the elderly, and in today’s English, against homosexuals. And, of course, its original meaning was a bundle of sticks.

Words only mean what society believes they mean. The Redskins’ name has, perhaps inadvertently, largely changed the definition of the word from something negative to something not negative. That’s a good thing. Bringing up this old debate only serves to take us backwards and transform the word back into its original meaning. That needs to stop.

This isn’t to say that the word “Redskin” isn’t still offensive to some people in some contexts and NFL commissioner Roger Goodell played off that by saying that “if one person’s offended, we have to listen.” However, I think his argument is tremendously flawed. For example, consider the case of Robert “Two Eagles” Green, a retired chief of the 1300-member Patawomeck Tribe. He says that, “frankly, the members of my tribe, the vast majority, don’t find it offensive.” In fact, he goes on to say that, “to be honest with you, I would be offended if they DID change it.” And that’s the flaw with catering to everything any person finds offensive. It’s impossible. There is no possible way to cater to both people who find the name offensive and people who would find a name change offensive.

For that reason, it’s important to know how many Native Americans actually find the name offensive. Robert “Two Eagles” Green notes that the vast majority of his 1300-member tribe doesn’t, but it’s important to have a concrete, tangible number behind that. Well, according to an Annenberg Public Policy Center poll, over 90% of Native Americans DO NOT find the name offensive. That’s a pretty powerful number.

ESPN columnist Rick Reilly mentions this statistic in his article about the subject and brings up a bunch of other very good examples. He mentions three High Schools where Native Americans are the majority, including a High School in Arizona whose student body is 99.3% Native Americans, who actually use “Redskins” as their own school mascot. He notes that the vast majority of these students does not find anything offensive about the name and wear it with pride as any High School would. This is because the word simply does not mean what it used to mean. That’s a good thing. Why is anyone trying to change that?

It seems the vast majority of the people who are actually “offended” by the term are media and political types, largely white, who seem to want to get offended on the Native Americans’ behalf, like they can’t possibly know well enough to get offended on their own. I personally find THAT offense. Maybe if I wrote a letter to Roger Goodell, he would have to listen to me. After all, I am one person.

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]