New York Jets at New England Patriots: 2014 Week 7 NFL Pick

New York Jets (1-5) at New England Patriots (4-2)

The Jets are as bad as I expected them to be this season and their record is as bad as they’ve been over the past two seasons. The Jets 8-8 record in 2013 was a farce as the Jets had a 5-1 record in games decided by a touchdown or less and a point differential of -97. They moved the chains at a mere 65.59% rate, as opposed to 69.64% for their opponents, a differential of -4.05% that ranked 25th in the NFL. This season, they are right around there, moving the chains at a 66.08% rate, as opposed to 72.47% for their opponents, a differential of -6.39% that ranks 28th.

I’m not taking the Jets here, especially on the road where they have been even worse over the past 2 seasons. Since the start of last season, the Jets are 7-5 at home, getting outscored by an average of 1.58 points per game. Comparably, they are 2-8 on the road, getting outscored by an average of 14.00 points per game. Meanwhile, the Patriots have won every season home game over that time period by an average of 12.00 points per game, while going 8-3 ATS.

However, we’re not really getting any line value with the Patriots as 10 point favorites, as bad as the Jets are. The Patriots have been moving the chains at a 71.58% rate, as opposed to 70.81% for their opponents, a differential of 0.77% that ranks 14th in the NFL and suggests they should be around 10 point favorites here. Sure they’ve been a lot better over the past two weeks, but how they played before that can’t be overlooked. Also working against the Patriots case is the fact that they are 8-15 ATS since 2010 as favorites of 8 or more. I’m still laying the points, but I’m not confident at all.

New England Patriots 24 New York Jets 13

Pick against spread: New England -10

Confidence: None

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Cincinnati Bengals at Indianapolis Colts: 2014 Week 7 NFL Pick

Cincinnati Bengals (3-1-1) at Indianapolis Colts (4-2)

The Bengals played the Panthers to a tie last week and now they have to go on the road to Indianapolis. That puts them at a disadvantage rest wise, for obvious reasons. Ties are rare so there isn’t a big sample size, but teams are 5-9 ATS off of a tie since 1989, including 0-5 ATS on the road, all of which makes sense. Making matters worse, the Colts are coming off of a Thursday Night game so they’ve had extra rest and the Colts are much better at home than the Bengals are on the road. Since the start of the Andrew Luck/Chuck Pagano era in 2012, the Colts are 13-6 ATS at home. Meanwhile, the Bengals are 3-6-1 on the road since the start of last season, including losses in 2013 to non-playoff teams like Cleveland, Miami, Chicago, Baltimore, and Pittsburgh and a close call in Buffalo.

This line is also suggesting that these two teams are even and that’s not true right now, even before you take into account the Colts’ home dominance, the Bengals’ road struggles, or the rest factor. The Colts are arguably the best team in the NFL right now, or at least they’ve played like it through 6 games. With the exception of a 3 point home loss as 3 point home favorites to the Eagles, the Colts have covered every game this season. Both of their losses came against teams that currently have one loss and they came by a combined 10 points.

Andrew Luck is playing like the type of quarterback he was expected to become, completing 66.2% of his passes for an average 7.64 YPA, 17 touchdowns, 7 interceptions. He’s also rushed for 93 yards and 2 touchdowns on the ground on 26 carries. The defense has held up as well. Through 6 games, they are moving the chains at a 79.04% rate, as opposed to 70.65% for their opponents, a differential of 8.39% that is best in the NFL by close to 2 percentage points (6.69% is the next best).

Meanwhile, the Bengals rank 21st. They are moving the chains at a 74.39% rate, as opposed to 75.69%, a differential of -1.30%. They were a lot better last season, finishing 3rd in rate of moving the chains differential and they could still play a lot better this season, but it’s possible that the off-season losses of both coordinators Jay Gruden and Mike Zimmer as well as talented defensive starter Michael Johnson are too much for them, as their defense has been the unit that’s disappointed the most. They could bounce back long-term, but I’m not betting on them on the road in Indianapolis as mere field goal underdogs when the Colts have the rest advantage. The Colts are the easy play here.

Indianapolis Colts 27 Cincinnati Bengals 17

Pick against the spread: Indianapolis -3

Confidence: High

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Kansas City Chiefs at San Diego Chargers: 2014 Week 7 NFL Pick

Kansas City Chiefs (2-3) at San Diego Chargers (4-1)

The Chargers are in about as bad as a spot as a team can be this week. They have a huge game 4 days after this in Denver, arguably the biggest game of their season. This game here is important because it’s a divisional game obviously, but the Chargers are at home and significantly favored. The Chiefs, meanwhile, have a random non-conference game against the Rams on deck and they’ll be heavily favored against the Rams in Kansas City. Teams tend to struggle as favorites before being underdogs and teams tend to perform well as underdogs before being favorites, for obvious reasons.

For example, teams are 106-76 ATS divisional road underdogs before being non-divisional home favorites since 2002. Even more powerful, teams are just 19-51 ATS since 2002 as divisional home favorites before being divisional road favorites. Going off of that, teams are 94-56 ATS since 2010 as underdogs before being favorites when their opponent will next be underdogs, including 94-57 ATS since 2008 as road underdogs before being home favorites when their opponent will next be road underdogs. Combining these, teams are just 24-70 ATS since 1989 as divisional home favorites before being divisional road underdogs when their opponents will next be home favorites.

Making things even worse for the Chargers is the fact that their game against the Broncos just 4 days after this one as they go to Denver on Thursday Night Football. Teams are just 33-55 ATS since 2008 as favorites before a Thursday Night Football game. We’re also getting a little bit of line value with the Chiefs, as the Chargers are 3rd in the NFL with a rate of moving the chains differential of 6.43%, as opposed to 5.99% for the Chiefs, who are 6th.

The Chargers are moving the chains at a 77.42% rate, as opposed to 70.99% for their opponents. Meanwhile, the Chiefs are moving the chains at a 77.42% rate, as opposed to 71.43% for their opponents. This line is too high even before you get into all the situational trends I mentioned above. I don’t see the Chargers being able to beat them by 6 or more in the spot they’re currently in. The Chiefs are my Pick of the Week.

Update: I’m glad I locked this in at 5.5 at the very beginning of the week. Despite the public action being on San Diego, this spread quickly dropped to 4, suggesting heavy, immediate sharp action on Kansas City. This further affirms my position. I’d still take it at 4.

San Diego Chargers 24 Kansas City Chiefs 23

Pick against the spread: Kansas City +5.5

Confidence: Pick of the Week

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Rate of Moving the Chains – Week 7

What is this? This is rate of moving the chains, which is my primary statistic for handicapping games. It holds the assumption that the goal of any team on any given 1st and 10 (or 1st and goal) is to move the chains (or score). In order to figure out how often teams meet that goal, I take first downs plus touchdowns and divide it by first downs plus touchdowns plus failures to move the chains (successes divided by attempts). Failures to move the chains include punts, turnovers, failed 4th downs, and field goal attempts (being forced to kick a field goal is a failure). I have this sorted by percent for (to evaluate offenses), percent against (to evaluate defenses), and differentials (to evaluate teams).

Offense

First Downs Touchdowns Field Goals Punts Turnovers Failed 4ths Safeties
1 NO 137 16 8 15 10 1 0 81.82%
2 IND 160 21 12 21 11 4 0 79.04%
3 GB 121 19 8 23 4 2 2 78.21%
4 DAL 142 17 14 19 12 0 0 77.94%
5 BAL 137 18 16 17 7 4 0 77.89%
6 CHI 138 16 9 23 10 2 0 77.78%
7 SD 126 18 12 26 2 2 0 77.42%
8 KC 106 14 7 20 6 2 0 77.42%
9 CLE 111 15 9 25 2 2 0 76.83%
10 DEN 108 17 7 28 4 0 0 76.22%
11 CAR 130 14 14 26 7 0 0 75.39%
12 CIN 108 14 17 17 6 2 0 74.39%
13 PIT 134 11 12 29 7 2 0 74.36%
14 SF 117 13 14 22 6 3 0 74.29%
15 ATL 128 18 9 26 12 4 0 74.11%
16 WAS 131 16 8 29 13 3 0 73.50%
17 NYG 131 16 7 31 11 4 0 73.50%
18 SEA 94 14 10 22 4 2 1 73.47%
19 STL 109 10 9 22 10 2 0 73.46%
20 MIA 109 12 10 19 11 7 0 72.02%
21 TB 108 13 7 25 12 3 1 71.60%
22 NE 122 14 17 28 5 4 0 71.58%
23 PHI 127 14 13 30 14 2 0 70.50%
24 ARZ 95 9 14 27 3 0 0 70.27%
25 HOU 108 12 11 29 10 2 0 69.77%
26 TEN 111 11 11 30 7 3 2 69.71%
27 DET 110 12 15 29 8 2 0 69.32%
28 OAK 81 10 4 27 10 1 0 68.42%
29 MIN 109 9 13 30 10 3 0 67.82%
30 NYJ 103 10 9 34 12 3 0 66.08%
31 JAX 104 9 9 34 12 4 0 65.70%
32 BUF 101 10 15 36 7 3 1 64.16%

 

Defense

First Downs Touchdowns Field Goals Punts Turnovers Failed 4ths Safeties
1 DET 101 8 9 37 9 3 1 64.88%
2 BUF 126 11 15 32 10 3 0 69.54%
3 DEN 102 12 9 30 5 3 1 70.37%
4 PHI 131 15 12 36 9 4 0 70.53%
5 IND 115 15 10 29 12 3 0 70.65%
6 NE 118 13 12 25 14 3 0 70.81%
7 SD 103 12 4 27 9 6 1 70.99%
8 DAL 102 12 9 23 10 4 0 71.25%
9 KC 96 9 13 24 3 2 0 71.43%
10 MIA 100 13 10 24 8 3 0 71.52%
11 BAL 120 9 15 24 9 3 0 71.67%
12 CHI 110 14 14 19 12 4 0 71.68%
13 WAS 116 16 11 36 4 1 0 71.74%
14 NYJ 112 17 9 37 3 0 0 72.47%
15 MIN 114 16 9 33 5 2 0 72.63%
16 NYG 122 14 12 25 12 2 0 72.73%
17 SEA 102 12 9 26 5 1 1 73.08%
18 ARZ 105 13 7 23 11 2 0 73.29%
19 SF 113 12 6 26 11 2 0 73.53%
20 HOU 136 14 9 29 14 2 0 73.53%
21 PIT 120 14 14 27 6 1 0 73.63%
22 CLE 117 13 8 25 5 4 1 75.14%
23 STL 94 13 9 17 7 2 0 75.35%
24 CIN 126 11 14 18 8 3 1 75.69%
25 ATL 132 18 16 23 9 0 0 75.76%
26 CAR 133 18 13 19 12 2 0 76.65%
27 TEN 151 17 12 26 9 4 0 76.71%
28 JAX 136 17 15 25 4 2 0 76.88%
29 OAK 109 14 11 17 5 3 0 77.36%
30 GB 137 14 8 19 13 4 0 77.44%
31 NO 108 14 10 20 2 0 1 78.71%
32 TB 149 22 16 18 10 0 0 79.53%

 

Overall

1 IND 8.39%
2 DAL 6.69%
3 SD 6.43%
4 BAL 6.22%
5 CHI 6.10%
6 KC 5.99%
7 DEN 5.85%
8 DET 4.44%
9 NO 3.11%
10 WAS 1.76%
11 CLE 1.68%
12 GB 0.78%
13 NYG 0.77%
14 NE 0.77%
15 SF 0.76%
16 PIT 0.73%
17 MIA 0.50%
18 SEA 0.39%
19 PHI -0.03%
20 CAR -1.26%
21 CIN -1.30%
22 ATL -1.65%
23 STL -1.90%
24 ARZ -3.02%
25 HOU -3.76%
26 MIN -4.81%
27 BUF -5.38%
28 NYJ -6.39%
29 TEN -7.00%
30 TB -7.94%
31 OAK -8.94%
32 JAX -11.19%

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

2014 Week 6 NFL Pick Results

Against the Spread: 9-6

Straight Up: 11-3-1

Pick of the Week: 0-1

High Confidence: 1-1

Medium Confidence: 2-2

Low Confidence: 2-1

No Confidence: 4-1

Upset Picks: 2-2

Against the Spread: 57-33-1

Straight Up: 59-31-1

Pick of the Week: 3-3

High Confidence: 3-5

Medium Confidence: 21-7

Low Confidence: 14-9-1

No Confidence: 16-9

Upset Picks: 8-7

Survivor Picks: 4-2 (PHI, GB, NO, SD, DET, NO)

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Pittsburgh Steelers at Cleveland Browns: 2014 Week 6 NFL Pick

Pittsburgh Steelers (3-2) at Cleveland Browns (2-2)

This is one of the games that I’m most indecivise on this week. Both of these teams are in good spots with easy games up next. The Steelers have a non-divisional home game against an average at best Houston team next week, while the Browns head to Jacksonville for a non-divisional game with the worst team in the NFL. Teams are 106-75 ATS as divisional road favorites before being non-divisional home favorites since 2002.

At the same time, the Browns are projected to be 4 point road favorites in Jacksonville, which just shows how bad the Jaguars are. Teams are 74-49 ATS before being 3+ point road favorites since 2012, including 46-28 ATS before being 4+ point road favorites over that time period. I’ve gone back and forth on this game a bunch of times this week. At the end of the day, I’m taking the Browns and fading the public underdog Steelers on principle, but I’m not confident at all.

Cleveland Browns 16 Pittsburgh Steelers 13

Pick against spread: Cleveland -1

Confidence: None

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Denver Broncos at New York Jets: 2014 Week 6 NFL Pick

Denver Broncos (3-1) at New York Jets (1-4)

The Jets got destroyed last week in San Diego, losing 31-0 and that’s caused a significant line movement. A week ago, this line was at 6 and now it’s at 9.5 and possibly climbing even more before game time. Ordinarily, I like to fade that kind of line movement, especially with the public all over the favorite Denver here, but I’m still going with the Broncos here. I’m not that confident and there really isn’t much line value with the Broncos, but they still seem like the right side. The Jets were terrible last week so some of that line movement was deserved.

They are now 28th in rate of moving the chains differential at -5.75%, moving the chains at a 66.67% rate, as opposed to 72.41% for their opponents. Meanwhile, the Broncos are moving the chains at a 77.10%, as opposed to 71.85% for their opponents, a differential of 5.25%, 4th in the NFL. The line seems like it’s right where it should be. The Jets are also in a bad spot as they have to go to New England in 4 days for Thursday Night Football. They might not be focused enough to even cover this spread against a dominant opponent. Teams are 40-81 ATS since 2010 before being double digit underdogs, including 28-62 ATS as underdogs before being double digit underdogs. Again I’m not confident, but the Broncos are my pick here.

Denver Broncos 30 New York Jets 20

Pick against spread: Denver -9.5

Confidence: None

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

San Francisco 49ers at St. Louis Rams: 2014 Week 6 NFL Pick

San Francisco 49ers (3-2) at St. Louis Rams (1-3)

The 49ers have generally beaten up on bad teams in the Jim Harbaugh era, dating back to 2011, going 24-15 ATS as favorites of 3+ in that time period. The Rams definitely qualify as a bad team, as they are 1-3 and rank 22nd in rate of moving the chains differential at -2.18%. They move the chains at a 74.81% rate, as opposed to 76.99% for their opponents. However, the 49ers are 1-3-1 ATS this season despite the fact that they’ve been favored by 3 or more in all 5 games, the situation they traditionally dominate in.

They haven’t been the same team this season thanks to the loss of guys like NaVorro Bowman, Aldon Smith, Glenn Dorsey, and Anthony Davis to injury. Vernon Davis is expected back for this one, but they’ve still struggled by their standards this season and I don’t know if that’s going to fix everything, especially since their biggest problems are defensively. They are moving the chains at 75.34% rate, as opposed to 74.82% for their opponents, a differential of 0.52% that ranks only 16th in the NFL. I’m still going to take the 49ers, especially since home divisional underdogs are 30-56 ATS in night games since 1989, but I’m not confident at all.

San Francisco 49ers 24 St. Louis Rams 20

Pick against spread: San Francisco -3.5

Confidence: None

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

San Diego Chargers at Oakland Raiders: 2014 Week 6 NFL Pick

San Diego Chargers (4-1) at Oakland Raiders (0-4)

The Chargers have broken out as one of the top teams in the NFL and are a legitimate contender. Their offense has continued to be as good as it was last season. Last season, they moved the chains at a 78.26% rate, 2nd in the NFL. This season, they’re actually doing worse than that, moving the chains at a 75.82% rate, ranking 13th in the NFL. However, that’s still really good and much of the decline is because they are averaging just 2.80 yards per carry. Philip Rivers is playing like an MVP candidate, completing 70.3% of his passes for an average of 8.75 YPA, 12 touchdowns, and 2 interceptions. Things will get even better when Ryan Mathews comes back from injury and Brendan Oliver had a strong performance last week, rushing for 114 yards and a touchdown on 19 attempts, catching 4 passes for another 68 yards and another touchdown.

The biggest difference for this team between last year and this year though is the defense, which is allowing opponents to move the chains at a 69.63% rate, 4th in the NFL. Free agent acquisition Brandon Flowers has been huge, having a big-time bounce back year and showing himself to once again be one of the best cornerbacks in the NFL. Overall, the Chargers have a rate of moving the chains differential of 6.19%, 2nd in the NFL. Meanwhile, the Raiders are a train wreck, moving the chains at a 66.04% rate, as opposed to 75.40% for their opponents, a differential of -9.36% that is only better than Jacksonville. This line isn’t high enough at a touchdown, especially since the Chargers don’t have any huge distractions on the horizon. The Chargers host the Chiefs next. Teams are 42-24 ATS as divisional road favorites before being divisional home favorites since 2002. The Chargers should be the right side.

San Diego Chargers 31 Oakland Raiders 17

Pick against spread: San Diego -7

Confidence: Low

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Baltimore Ravens at Tampa Bay Buccaneers: 2014 Week 6 NFL Pick

Baltimore Ravens (3-2) at Tampa Bay Buccaneers (1-4)

The Ravens have been very good at home over the past few seasons, since 2008 when Joe Flacco and John Harbaugh came to town. However, they haven’t been as good on the road.  Since 2008, the Ravens are 43-10 at home, outscoring opponents by an average of 10.30 points per game. On the other hand, they are 31-30 on the road, outscoring opponents by an average of 0.85 points per game, a difference of about 9.5 points per game. They fell flat on the road in Indianapolis last week, losing 26-13.

That being said, they are now in their 2nd straight road game, which tends to work on better for teams. Teams are 174-180 in their 2nd of two road games since 2008, getting outscored by an average of 0.12 points per game, as opposed to 244-355 in their 1st of one road games since 2008, getting outscored by an average of 3.36 points per game. Teams seem to adjust to the road in their 2nd straight road game. Road underdogs off of a road loss tend to cover at the highest rate, but teams are 32-22 ATS as road favorites off of a road loss in their 2nd road game of two.

The Buccaneers, conversely, are in a bad spot, coming off of a rough overtime loss in New Orleans last week. Teams are 13-21 ATS since 1989 as home underdogs off an overtime loss as road underdogs. We’re also getting line value with the Ravens. They are moving the chains at a 76.83% rate, as opposed to 71.92% for their opponents, a differential of 4.91% that ranks 5th in the NFL. I am concerned about their offense without Dennis Pitta and Eugene Monroe, especially after how poorly they played in Indianapolis last week, but I still like their chances of bouncing back here this week.

Baltimore Ravens 24 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 17

Pick against spread: Baltimore -3.5

Confidence: Low

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]