Browns’ bench two in secondary

Through 2 games, Cleveland has surrendered the 7th most passing yards in the league. With Joe Haden suspended for 3 more games, that figures to only get worse. Without Haden last week, the Browns surrendered 24 completions for 318 yards and 3 touchdowns on 31 attempts, while picking off one pass, against Andy Dalton and the Bengals, who were fresh off an embarrassing offensive performance in Baltimore, in which Dalton completed 22 of 37 for 221 yards and an interception.

Seeing the secondary as a weakness, the Browns have decided to take some action and have benched two starters. Starting cornerback Sheldon Brown was benched for Buster Skrine, while starting free safety Eric Hagg was benched for Usama Young this week. Brown is 33 years old and probably at the end of his line. This demotion, even with Haden out, suggests that he’ll be no higher than 4th when Haden returns, barring injuries. In his first NFL start, Skrine, a 2011 6th round pick, was horrendous, allowing 8 completions for 89 yards on 9 attempts last week, in place of an injured Brown. Still, the Browns decided to keep him in the starting lineup permanently. However, if he continues to play like this, he’ll be benched when Joe Haden returns, in favor of keeping the veteran Dmitri Patterson in the starting lineup.

Whereas Brown being benched for Skrine was a case of a veteran being benched for a youngster, Hagg being benched for Young was a case of a struggling youngster being benched for what they hope will be a stabilizing veteran presence. Hagg, a 2011 7th round pick, has not been thrown on much, but has struggled on those occasions, allowing 2 completions for 54 yards and a touchdown on 3 attempts. He’s also struggled against the run, recording just 5 total tackles, missing one, and having 2 stops. Young, a 2007 5th round pick, has yet to play a snap this season and was almost cut from an undrafted free agent as part of final cuts. Like Skrine, he does not figure to be much of an upgrade. The Browns’ defense figures to continue to be one that is very kind to opposite fantasy players, especially while Haden remains out. This week, they face the Bills.

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Buffalo Bills at Cleveland Browns: Week 3 NFL Pick

Buffalo Bills (1-1) at Cleveland Browns (0-2)

Before the season, I identified 5 overrated and 5 underrated teams, with the idea of betting on them (or against them) until they proved me wrong or the odds makers caught up. This served me well as I’m 10-4 this year on games involving those 10 teams. One of the 4 losses was because I abandoned shipped on the Bills after week 1 and picked the Chiefs last week. In doing so, I broke one of my own rules, never overreact to one week (I also broke another one of my rules last week, never bet heavily on Jay Cutler, those two losses were two of just five. I should listen to myself.)

I had the Bills making it into the playoffs on the good defense, good running game, conservative offense, don’t make mistakes, easy schedule model, but after their week 1 loss, I overreacted and dropped them. However, the Bills bounced back big time this week and beat the Chiefs by 18 in a game that was 35-3 after the first 3 quarters before 2 garbage time scores. They looked exactly like what I envisioned they would and they can definitely continue to beat up on crappy competition like that. And for the record, no this is not an overreaction to one game. I’m simply undoing my previous overreaction. Without Fred Jackson, CJ Spiller looks like one of the best running backs in the league and the defense looks like I thought they would, which makes live easy for Ryan Fitzpatrick.

The Browns count as crappy competition, definitely. Without Joe Haden, they are probably the worst team in the league and at the very least they’re one of the worst. This is the type of team Buffalo should be able to establish their game plan against and dominate. I feel like the Bills are once again being really underrated, even more so than the beginning of the year.

In the beginning of the year, they were a popular sleeper and even with the Jets in the odds makers book, but one bad game and one good game and now all of a sudden they’re just -3 at a Browns team that should never be bet as anything other than dogs of 3+ against anyone other than really crappy teams. The Bills aren’t and I’m taking one of my original underrated teams to dominate them in Cleveland.

As long as I get field goal protection, this is a moderate sized bet and I do get field goal protection at -3. The only reason this isn’t a huge bet is because New England is next on the schedule for the Bills (and after that, San Francisco. They could be caught looking forward to that one. Still, I’m certainly not taking the Browns to win this game, even at home, and with such a small spread, that’s basically what you have to be comfortable doing if you take Cleveland.

Public lean: Buffalo (new thing I’m adding, siding with the odds makers on bets is not a bad thing to do since they make so much money, so I’m listing this here to allow readers to “fade” the public, if they so choose, in this example, the odds makers win if Cleveland covers)

Buffalo Bills 27 Cleveland Browns 16

Pick against spread: Buffalo -3 (-105) 3 units

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Cleveland Browns: Week 3 NFL Power Rankings (#32)

Last week: 32 (+0)

Record: 0-2

The Browns hung with an overrated Bengals team this weekend, but I think Cincinnati is one of the worst teams in the league. 2 weeks into the season, the Browns are one of just 6 teams without a win and appear to be the weakest of the 6. They’re currently the leaders in the Blow for Barkley sweepstakes. The question is, would they take Barkley and give up on Weeden after one year, or trade the pick for a king’s ransom like the Rams did last year, and move forward with Weeden into his age 30 season in 2013?

Studs

LG Jason Pinkston: Did not allow a pressure on 41 pass block snaps, run blocked for 10 yards on 3 attempts

RT Mitchell Schwartz: Allowed 1 quarterback hit and 1 quarterback hurry on 41 pass block snaps, run blocked for 21 yards on 4 attempts

RB Trent Richardson: Rushed for 109 yards (41 after contact) and a touchdown on 19 carries, broke 1 tackle, caught 4 passes for 36 yards and a touchdown on 4 targets

MLB D’Qwell Jackson: Allowed 1 catch for 9 yards on 1 attempt, 1 interception, 3 sacks on 6 blitzes, 1 solo tackle, 4 stops

Duds

RG Shawn Lauvao: Allowed 1 quarterback hit and 4 quarterback hurries on 41 pass block snaps, 1 penalty, run blocked for 9 yards on 2 attempts

CB Buster Skrine: Allowed 8 catches for 94 yards on 9 attempts, 1 penalty, 7 solo tackles, 1 stop, 3 missed tackles

FS Eric Hagg: Allowed 1 catch for 44 yards and a touchdown on 1 attempt, 4 solo tackles, 2 stops, 1 missed special teams tackle

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Cleveland Browns at Cincinnati Bengals: Week 2 NFL Pick

Cleveland Browns (0-1) at Cincinnati Bengals (0-1)

Before the season started, I identified 5 teams I thought were overrated and 5 I thought were underrated. The idea was to bet these teams (or against these teams) until I was proven wrong or until the odds makers caught up. It served me well last week. Of the 7 games involving these 10 teams, I nailed 5, including my pick of the week. I unfortunately went 3-6 on my other 9 to finish at .500 for the week ATS, but it’s good to see that my overrated/underrated choices seem to have been pretty accurate. I’ll try to use those this week, unless I feel the odds makers caught up, with two exceptions (San Francisco and Buffalo, two I got wrong last week).

Here, I don’t really feel the odds makers caught up and there’s a good reason for that. Cincinnati got blown out last week, as I predicted they would, but they did it against Baltimore, so everyone seems to be giving them a bit of a pass. However, I have Baltimore as one of my overrated teams, so we have an overrated team in Cincinnati remaining overrated because people are overrating their week 1 strength of opponent. Baltimore seems to have an improved offense, but they lost several key contributors defensively and have several others aging and they have yet to prove to me that their struggles on the road and overall inconsistencies are gone.

Cincinnati, meanwhile, failed to beat a single playoff team last year, going 0-8 in such games and if Baltimore makes the playoffs this year, his record would be 0-9 through his first season and a game against playoff teams. Fortunately, Cleveland is almost definitely not a playoff team. The Bengals also have suffered several major injuries. Leon Hall, predictably, is not 100% back from a torn Achilles suffered about 10 months ago and was uncharacteristically torched in the Baltimore game. They also put two starters on the offensive line, Kyle Cook and Travelle Wharton, on IR. On top of that, top pass rusher Carlos Dunlap and two of their cornerbacks, Jason Allen and Dre Kirkpatrick, missed last week and could miss again this week.

Then there’s the issue of Andy Dalton’s arm strength. Jay Gruden did a great job of scheming around his physical limitations last year, but you can only do that for so long. He struggled down the stretch last season, particularly against tougher opponents, and continued that in the preseason and in the opener against Baltimore, where he completed 22 of 37 for 221 yards and a pick. Those numbers don’t even tell the whole story. Only 80 of those 221 yards were in the air; the rest were after the catch. He settled for short stuff all night, completing just 4 passes that went more than 10 yards through the air (4 of 11) and his adjusted QB rating of 66.2 was 26th out of 32 starting quarterbacks in the NFL week 1.

This team could easily lose 10 or more games this season. This isn’t some new prediction. I made it before the season and I’m sticking with it. Given that, they don’t deserve to be favorites of more than 6 against any one, not even the Browns, who I think are the league’s worst team, especially now without Joe Haden, their top defensive players. Teams that finish with 6 wins or fewer cover at roughly a 30% rate as favorites of 6 or more. This is a very powerful trend if you can accurately predict how teams will finish.

On top of that, there are other situational trends in play, ones that don’t take any forecasting. The Bengals are coming off a huge loss on MNF, losing by 31 on MNF. Teams that do this are typically flat the following week. It makes sense. Not only are you on a short week, but you are coming off a deflating loss. Since 2002, teams are 14-23 ATS coming off losses of 21+ on MNF, 3-12 ATS if they are favored the next week, as Cincinnati is.

On top of that, this is what’s known as a sandwich game. After this, the Bengals travel to Washington, where they will almost certainly be underdogs. Teams that are favorites before and after being underdogs are 37-54 ATS since 2010. This makes sense. Teams can’t bring the same level of intensity every week in the NFL. It just doesn’t happen; that’s why upsets happen. Teams typically are flatter than normal coming off a tough game and going into a tough game. The Bengals may see this is an easy breather and a chance to get their confidence back, which is not the right way to approach any game in the NFL. Anyone can lose at any time.

Meanwhile, the Bengals tend to fall flat as favorites anyway, going 5-13 ATS in this situation since 2007. One trend that works in the Browns’ favor, teams are 48-30 ATS after a loss of 3 or fewer at home as underdogs since 2002. This makes some sense. It seems to give confidence to teams if they are able to hang close in a game where they were expected to get blown out at home, but it doesn’t have the same adjusting affect on the spread that an actual win would produce.

I also believe this is what’s called a trap line. Trap lines are when odds makers want the public to bet one way or another so they make a “too good to be true” line. Typically when odds makers want you to do something, it’s a good idea not to do it. The two signs of a trap line are a suspiciously low line and a line that drops even though the majority of the public is betting it. Right now, about 75% of the money is on Cincinnati, yet the line has dropped from -7.5 when it opened (already suspiciously low) to -7 with juice. They really want us to bet Cincinnati. The odds makers seem to agree that Cincinnati is overrated and they know no one is going to want to bet the Browns as mere touchdown underdogs. They’re not a bad group of guys to have agree with you. They’re not stupid. That’s why they make money every single year.

Even still, there is line value here. Cincinnati is still being overrated by the odds makers even with the “too good to be true line.” Cincinnati is not the type of team that deserves to be favored by more than a touchdown over anyone. I think at the end of the year, we’ll wonder why this wasn’t something like Cincinnati -4 (3 points for home field advantage). Besides, all the trends are in Cleveland’s favor. I would make this my pick of the week, but Cleveland is really terrible, so instead, this will just be a significant bet. Brandon Weeden probably won’t be quite as bad as he was last week now that he has one start under his belt. I’m also picking Cincinnati to win outright here at home, but this is going to be a close, ugly, and unwatchable game, unless you have money on it, which I recommend you do.

Public lean: Cincinnati (new thing I’m adding, siding with the odds makers on bets is not a bad thing to do since they make so much money, so I’m listing this here to allow readers to “fade” the public, if they so choose, in this example, the odds makers win if Cleveland covers)

Cincinnati Bengals 16 Cleveland Browns 13

Pick against spread: Cleveland +7 (-115) 4 units

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Cleveland Browns: Week 2 NFL Power Rankings (#32)

Last week: 29 (-3)

Record: 0-1

Yikes. 12 of 35 for 118 yards and 4 interceptions. That is one of the worst quarterback performances I’ve ever seen. It’s pretty clear, Weeden, despite his age, is not a nearly finished product. It wasn’t all his fault; his supporting cast sucks. He’ll also probably improve as the season goes on, but this offense is incredibly young and will have many growing pains, to say the least. They started a rookie at quarterback, running back, wide receiver, and on the offensive line, as well as a 2nd year player in the at wide receiver and a 2nd year player on the offensive line. Also, the Browns just lost their best defensive player, Joe Haden, for 4 games. Wins are going to be hard to come by for this team.

Studs

DT Ahytba Rubin: 4 quarterback hits, 3 quarterback pressures on 51 pass rush snaps, 1 assisted tackle on 26 run snaps

MLB D’Qwell Jackson: Allowed 3 catches for 28 yards on 7 attempts, 1 interception, 2 pass deflections, 3 solo tackles, 3 stops, 1 missed tackle on 30 run plays, 1 quarterback pressure on 8 blitzes

ROLB Craig Robertson: 8 solo tackles, 3 stops on 13 run plays, allowed 4 completions for 47 yards on 6 attempts, 1 interception, 1 pass deflection, 1 quarterback hit on 5 blitzes

RE Juqua Parker: 3 quarterback hits and 2 quarterback pressures on 36 pass rush snaps, 2 solo tackles and 2 stops on 12 run snaps

ROLB LJ Fort: 1 sack on 4 blitzes, 1 stop on 18 run plays, wasn’t thrown on, 1 interception, 1 pass deflection

WR Josh Cribbs: 6 punt returns for 78 yards, 3 kickoff returns for 91 yards

Duds

QB Brandon Weeden: 12 of 35 for 118 yards, 4 interceptions, 2 thrown aways, 3 drops, adjusted QB rating of 21.9, pressured 13 times

RG Shawn Lauvao: 1 sack and 3 quarterback pressures allowed on 40 pass block snaps, run blocked for 6 yards on 2 attempt

RT Mitchell Schwartz: Allowed 2 quarterback hits and 1 quarterback pressure on 40 pass block snaps, run blocked for 0 yards on 1 attempt

WR Greg Little: Played 33 pass snaps, did not catch a pass, targeted 4 times, once for an interception, 1 drop

LE Jabaal Sheard: 0 sacks, quarterback hits, or quarterback pressures on 45 pass rush snaps, 1 batted pass, 1 solo tackle, 1 stop on 26 run snaps

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Browns’ Joe Haden has not been suspended…yet

Earlier this offseason, there was some speculation that Joe Haden would be suspended for violation of the league’s substance abuse policy. That speculation was confirmed this week, after the NFL retested the sample, but Haden has appealed the suspension and will be allowed to play until the appeal is over, which sometimes can take months. He’ll be in uniform and shadow DeSean Jackson against the Eagles this week.

If Haden were to miss any time, it would be a huge blow to a team with so little talent. Haden has been one of the best cornerbacks in the NFL over the last 2 seasons and was a major Pro Bowl snub in 2011. He’s really been the only bright spot on an overall disappointing Browns team.  He’s allowed just 83 completions on 162 attempts (51.2%) for 1165 yards (7.2 YPA), 5 touchdowns and 6 interceptions, while deflecting 28 passes and committing 12 penalties in the last 2 seasons.

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Browns expect Trent Richardson to start, but may limit his carries

Trent Richardson had 2 knee surgeries this offseason, including one just about a month ago, but he’s still expected to start this week against the Eagles. However, the Browns may limit his carries after he was limited in practice all week. Montario Hardesty will be the beneficiary of Richardson ceding any carries on early downs, while 3rd down specialist Brandon Jackson will continue to serve in that role.

Still, it’s not a good sign that he’s had two surgeries and rookie running backs have trouble adjusting to the 16 game workload of the NFL historically anyway. 1st round pick running backs have averaged just 165 carries as rookies since 2007. Richardson will probably exceed that number, but I’m not all that hopeful, at least for his rookie year, especially on an offense that figures to be stagnant with so many rookies and 2nd year players playing big roles (6 of 11 offensive starters are in their 1st or 2nd year and that doesn’t include Josh Gordon and Jordan Cameron, who could be starters eventually and Travis Benjamin, who will start the season as their slot receiver). For this week, he’s a borderline starter in fantasy leagues, especially since Philadelphia has the potential offensively to make Cleveland have to abandon the run early.

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Philadelphia Eagles at Cleveland Browns Week 1 NFL Pick

Philadelphia Eagles (0-0) at Cleveland Browns (0-0)

Buy tickets for this game

One of the things I love doing is betting against rookie quarterbacks week 1. They tend to, predictably, struggle in their first NFL action. Since 1994, rookie quarterbacks have completed 55% of their passes, averaged 6 yards YPA, and thrown twice as many picks as touchdowns during weeks 1-4. I get 5 chances to do that this week, as Andrew Luck, Robert Griffin, Ryan Tannehill, Brandon Weeden, and Russell Wilson will all get the week 1 start for their respective teams. The Browns’ Brandon Weeden is 28 years old, but he’ll still have to make the transition from collegiate level defenses to NFL level defenses. The Eagles’ stout defense is going to be far tougher than anything he ever faced in the Big 12.

Weeden also has several major flaws, which is a big part of the reason why he wasn’t a top-10 pick. He tends to take unnecessary risks with the football and can get flustered when the pocket collapses. These are hardly rare attributes for rookie quarterbacks to have, but the issue with Weeden is, unlike most rookie quarterbacks, he doesn’t have 2-3 years to work through those flaws. If he were 22 or 23, sure he would have gone in the top-10, probably even a little bit ahead of Tannehill, but he’s 28, 29 this season. He’s actually older than Aaron Rodgers.

That’s why he fell to 22 to the Browns, where he wasn’t even the Browns’ 1st choice. They wanted Trent Richardson, Kendall Wright, and then Brandon Weeden, taking Weeden in the early 2nd round or late 1st after trading up, but when Wright went 20 to the Titans surprisingly, they just took Weeden. That tells me that the Browns didn’t see him as a polished prospect either. He won’t look like a polished prospect this year and especially not in his first game and against such tough competition.

Weeden has obviously physical advantages over incumbent Colt McCoy, but one of the things McCoy was really good at was avoiding turnovers. The Browns had just 19 turnovers last year. There have been 36 teams since 2002 with 20 or fewer turnovers. In their next season, those teams, have had, on average, 9.64 more turnovers and won 2.69 fewer games. It’s not hard to see how the Browns will turn the ball over more this season and that will limit how much the newcomers will improve things. They’ll be better than the 30th ranked offense they were last year, but not a lot better and they will probably really struggle early in the year as Weeden gets adjusted to the NFL and fellow 1st rounder Trent Richardson gets healthy.

Weeden also won’t have a lot of help. Because they were unable to get Wright, their receiving corps remains very thin. Greg Little could have a breakout year if everything goes right, but Little was one of the worst in the league last year in yards per targets (partially McCoy’s fault) and after him, everything is an even bigger question mark. Mohamed Massaquoi, a mediocre receiver, will start opposite him while their depth behind the two starters are two rookies, Travis Benjamin, a raw 4th rounder, and Josh Gordon, a 2nd round pick in the Supplemental draft who hasn’t played in a game that counts in almost 2 calendar years. Tight end Ben Watson, meanwhile, is a declining player. The Browns add two other rookies to their offense, right tackle Mitchell Schwartz and running back Trent Richardson, but the former was just a 2nd rounder so he might not be that great early on and the latter is less than a month removed from his 2nd knee surgery of the offseason so, even if he plays, it won’t be a full workload and he won’t be his normal self. This is a very young and inexperienced offense playing a great defense.

The biggest strength of the Eagles’ defense is their pass rush. They were tied for the league lead with 50 sacks last year, lead by 29 sacks from Trent Cole and Jason Babin combined, and could be even better this year as they add rotational rookies Fletcher Cox and Vinny Curry and return Brandon Graham from injury. They legitimately go 6 deep at defensive end with Cole, Babin, Graham, Curry, Darryl Tapp, and Phillip Hunt. For what it’s worth, I think they have 6 defensive ends better than Frostee Rucker, who starts at defensive end for the Eagles. They go 3 deep at defensive tackle with Cullen Jenkins, Derek Landri, and Cox. I think they might have the deepest defensive line in football. Joe Thomas is an excellent left tackle for the Browns, but they’ll give him a tough test and they should be able to exploit the holes the Browns have at other spots on the line. Aside from Thomas, only center Alex Mack is a solid starter on this offensive line, assuming Schwartz predictably struggles out of the gate as a rookie. Weeden will be under pressure all night and, as I mentioned, that’s something he has trouble with.

Moving back on the Eagles defense, they added two much needed starters at linebacker this offseason, DeMeco Ryans and Mychal Kendricks. Though the latter is a 2nd round rookie, linebackers typically don’t take as long to transition to the NFL. Their secondary also makes a lot more sense this year than last year, even though they lost Asante Samuel. Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie will no longer be playing on the slot, where he is such a poor fit. Heading into a contract year, DRC should be motivated and playing outside again will allow him to have a bounce back year.

Now on the slot is 4th round rookie Brandon Boykin. He might have been the top coverage cornerback in the draft after Morris Claiborne, but fell because of his lack of size and injury. He’s healthy now and his lack of size doesn’t matter much on the slot, where he figures to have a positive impact. Meanwhile, Nnamdi Asomugha will no longer be playing in zone coverage, like they had him in for the first 12 games of last season. Asomugha was a terrible fit in that scheme and played much better in their final 4 games once they allowed him to play man. He’s one of the top cornerbacks in the league in the right coverage scheme and it’s no coincidence they had the league’s best passing defense in their final 4 games once Asomugha started playing much better.

It’s for that and several other reasons why I think the Eagles will be very good this year. Their +68 points differential was best among non-playoff teams by a mile (San Diego was closest at +29). In fact, only 8 teams finished with a higher points differential, which means the Eagles played like a 10 or 11 win team last year, a win total they could have had if they had an average record in close games. Turnovers and records in games decided by less than 7 tend to average out on a year to year basis. They Eagles had 38 turnovers last year. Teams that turn the ball over 35 times or more in a season have on average 9.7 fewer turnovers the next season and win on average 1.61 more games, since 2002. Add 1.61 wins to what this team’s points differential suggested their wins total should have been and you get an 11-12 win team. This year, they may be even more talented. They would have been in my underrated group in my season preview if they weren’t such a popular “sleeper” pick that there’s basically no line value with them anymore. They’re -9 here on the road with juice and were one of just 8 teams to have an over/under set at 10 or more wins.

The Browns defense has no chance of stopping the Eagles’ offense. They ranked 5th in the league with 19.2 points per game allowed, ranked 5th against the pass with 6.7 YPA, and ranked 21st against the run with 4.4 YPC. They did all this despite only 20 turnovers. As they are offensively, turnovers are very unpredictable on a yearly basis defensively. The 38 teams who have managed 20 or fewer takeaways since 2002 have had 7.53 more takeaways and won 1.41 more games the following season.

However, they have been ravaged by injuries this offseason, losing Phil Taylor, Chris Gocong, and James-Michael Johnson, while Scott Fujita will miss this game with suspension, meaning they’ll be without 3 of their top 4 linebackers, forcing undrafted rookie LJ Fort to start at linebacker. Taylor’s absence will force 3rd round rookie John Hughes to start at defensive tackle. Hughes was a major reach in the 3rd round. He didn’t even think he had a chance to go before the 4th round and didn’t plan his draft party until day 3 of the draft (rounds 4-7). The good news is that it looks like Joe Haden will not be suspended for this one, but the Eagles can just easily pick on opposite cornerback Sheldon Brown, who is heading into his age 33 season. The Browns have one good defensive back (Haden), one good linebacker (D’Qwell Jackson), and one good defensive lineman (Jabaal Sheard) and that’s about it. That won’t be nearly enough to stop the Eagles, who averaged 24.8 points per game last year, despite those 38 turnovers.

The Eagles finished last season on an impressive 4-0 run and turned into the team that no one wanted to have to face in the playoffs, outscoring teams 125-46 over that stretch. Of course, they didn’t have very tough competition during that stretch (@Miami, vs. NY Jets, @ Dallas, vs. Washington), but they don’t have tough competition here either and should be able to blow out the Browns in Weeden’s debut. The only reason this isn’t a big bet is because I hate betting on road favorite of more than a touchdown (they tend to only cover about 40% of the time historically). It should be an easy blowout though.

Philadelphia Eagles 34 Cleveland Browns 12

Pick against spread: Philadelphia Eagles -9 (-115) 2 units

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Browns’ Trent Richardson expected back week 1

ESPN’s Adam Schefter expects the Browns’ Trent Richardson to be back for week 1, despite having a 2nd knee surgery earlier this month. Both surgeries were about as minor as they come as the 3rd overall pick in the NFL Draft and it doesn’t look like they’ll cost him any games yet. However, it’s hardly a good sign that he’s had two surgeries and rookie running backs have trouble adjusting to the 16 game workload of the NFL historically anyway. 1st round pick running backs have averaged just 165 carries as rookies since 2007. Richardson will probably exceed that number, but his ADP in the 3rd round right now is a little rich. Meanwhile, backup Montario Hardesty, who is finally healthy, makes for an interesting handcuff late, especially in deeper leagues.

If you’re interested in doing a fantasy football league with me, here’s the link (no draft date set yet, currently standard, with the option to become PPR with group vote). http://msn.foxsports.com/fantasy/football/commissioner/Registration/Private.aspx?league=55086&password=FanSpot2

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Ben Watson could be a final cut for Browns

Ben Watson was the Browns’ leading receiver as recently as 2010, producing very good numbers for a tight end, catching 68 passes for 763 yards and 3 touchdowns, with the former two stats being career highs. After largely failing to live up to his expectations in New England as a 2004 1st round pick, it seemed that Watson had finally emerged as an above average starting tight end. However, in 2011, he regressed, catching just 37 passes for 410 yards and 2 scores. Heading into his age 32 season, he’s apparently even on the roster bubble according to the Canton Repository.

This makes some sense as Watson is owed 2.88 million this season and they have a young tight end on the roster behind him waiting for a chance, 2011 4th round pick Jordan Cameron, who is having a strong offseason. Watson didn’t help his case by missing a big chunk of Training Camp with an unspecified injury. Another tight end reportedly on the roster bubble is Evan Moore, according to the Cleveland Plain Dealer.

Moore, currently 4th on the depth chart, has missed time this preseason with hamstring problems and is owed 1.88 million next season. He also has 62 career catches, but 34 of them were last season for the 2008 undrafted free agent. The Browns will almost certainly cut a tight end as it’s unlikely that they’ll go into 2012 with all 4 of Watson, Cameron, Moore, and Alex Smith. Smith seems locked in as a blocking specialist and Cameron has been really impressing this offseason, so it would appear to be between Watson and Moore for the final roster spot. If they don’t care about financials, they’ll keep Watson. If not, it’ll probably be Moore making the roster.

If you’re interested in doing a fantasy football league with me, here’s the link (no draft date set yet, currently standard, with the option to become PPR with group vote). http://msn.foxsports.com/fantasy/football/commissioner/Registration/Private.aspx?league=55086&password=FanSpot2

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]