Tennessee Titans at Jacksonville Jaguars: Week 12 NFL Pick

Tennessee Titans (4-6) at Jacksonville Jaguars (1-9)

One of the most powerful trends applies to road favorites after a bye. Since 2002, teams are 44-15 ATS as road favorites right after a bye, including 22-3 ATS as divisional road favorites off a bye. I only heavily bet on this trend when the road favorite deserves to be favorites, but here the Titans do. Using the yards per play differential method computing of line value, the Titans should be 1.5 point favorites and using the rate of sustaining drives differential method says the Titans should be 1 point favorites. We’re getting a bit of line value with the Jaguars, but not enough to combat that trend.

The Titans aren’t a very good team at 4-6, with a -91 points differential. Only Jacksonville, Oakland, and Kansas City have a points differential worse than them. However, even sub .500 teams are 9-4 ATS as road favorites since 2002. And the Jaguars are so bad that the Titans do deserve to be road favorites. They are -1.1 in yards per play differential. No one else is worse than -0.9. They are -15.2% in rate of sustaining drives differential. No one else is worse than -9.5%. The Titans are the -9.5% team, and they are coming off a fluky win (teams that score 28 or more points as dogs despite 300 or fewer yards go 43-64 ATS in their next game) but they still deserve to be road favorites. The Jaguars don’t deserve to be favorites against anyone.

Chad Henne is now the Jaguars’ starting quarterback. He looked great against Houston, certainly better Blaine Gabbert ever was, going 16 of 33 for 354 yards and 4 touchdowns, but he’s notorious for being inconsistent. This is still the same quarterback that got benched for Matt Moore in Miami and who completed 9 of 20 for 71 yards against Oakland’s terrible secondary, blowing a big lead, a few weeks ago. I’m not worried too much about him as an “X-factor” or anything like that.

The Jaguars are also in a terrible spot coming off that near win against the Texans last week. Excluding road dogs, teams are 18-46 ATS off a road overtime loss (6-14 ATS as home dogs) since 2002. It’s going to be very, very tough for this crappy 1-9 team to get up after losing the biggest game of their season against a huge division rival and the best team in the NFL record wise. Furthermore, teams are 5-15 ATS since 2002 off a divisional overtime loss as dogs.

The Titans should be able to win this one pretty easily so it’s a significant play on the road favorite. That 22-3 ATS trend is hard to ignore, especially in conjunction with an 18-46 ATS trend and a 5-15 ATS trend. I also really like that this isn’t a huge public lean on Tennessee because the odds makers do need to make back some money after a rough 3 week stretch. I just wish we had field goal protection.

Public lean: Tennessee (60% range)

Sharps lean: TEN 20 JAX 4

Final update: This is the biggest sharps lean of the week and I’m glad it’s on one of my 4-unit co-picks of the week. The LV Hilton spread is Tennessee -3 and if I had that, I’d put 5 units on it and make it a true pick of the week, but I have it at -3.5, so it’s 4.

Tennessee Titans 27 Jacksonville Jaguars 13

Pick against spread: Tennessee -3.5 (-110) 4 units

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Tennessee Titans: Week 11 NFL Power Rankings (#24)

Last week: 27 (+3)

Record: 4-6

What a weird two weeks for the Titans. First they get blown out in a game that wasn’t as bad as the final score. Then they blown out the Dolphins in a game that wasn’t as bad as the final score. Much like the Bears did to them, they were able to blow on the Dolphins thanks to dominating the turnover battle and were able to put up 37 points despite just 9 completions. That’s the just 18th time a team has had that few completions while putting up that many points since 1989. Meanwhile, teams they score 28 or more points as dogs despite 300 or fewer yards, like the Titans last week, go 43-64 ATS in their next game. The Titans better watch out after the bye.

Studs

QB Jake Locker: 9 of 21 for 122 yards and 2 touchdowns, 4 throw aways, 2 drops, 99.9 adjusted QB rating, pressured on 7 of 26 drop backs (1 sack, 1 scramble, 1 of 5, 1 touchdown, 1 throw away), rushed for 36 yards on 4 attempts

RB Chris Johnson: Rushed for 126 yards (50 after contact) and a touchdown on 23 attempts, 1 broken tackle, caught 1 pass for 8 yards on 1 attempt

LT Michael Roos: Allowed 1 quarterback hurry on 28 pass block snaps, 1 penalty, run blocked for 12 yards on 2 attempts

LG Steve Hutchinson: Allowed 1 quarterback hurry on 27 pass block snaps, run blocked for 34 yards on 7 attempts

MLB Colin McCarthy: 3 solo tackles, 2 stops, allowed 3 catches for 15 yards on 5 attempts, 1 interception

CB Alterraun Verner: Allowed 1 catch for 11 yards on 2 attempts, 1 pass deflection, 4 solo tackles, 1 stop

LE Derrick Morgan: 4 quarterback hurries on 30 pass rush snaps, 1 batted pass, 4 solo tackles, 3 stops, 1 missed tackle

K Rob Bironas: 8 kickoffs, 5 touchbacks, 71.8 yards per kickoff, 20.0 opponent’s average starting distance, 3/3 FG (37, 38, 53)

P Brett Kern: 4 punts for 208 yards, 3 inside 20, 2 returns for 16 yards, 48.0 net yards per punt

Duds

RE Kamerion Wimbley: Allowed 1 quarterback hurry on 29 pass rush snaps, 1 penalty, no tackles

DT Jurrell Casey: Did not record a pressure on 30 pass rush snaps, 1 solo tackle

LOLB Zach Brown: 2 solo tackles, 2 assists, 2 stops, 3 missed tackles, allowed 6 catches for 51 yards on 7 attempts, 1 interception

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Tennessee Titans at Miami Dolphins: Week 10 NFL Pick

Tennessee Titans (3-6) at Miami Dolphins (4-4)

Jake Locker returns this week for the Titans. It’s amazing. It’s almost as if his shoulder magically healed as soon as veteran backup Matt Hasselbeck had a bad game. Locker has more upside definitely and is the right quarterback for this team right now, because they’re not going anywhere fast and need to get the young former 1st rounder some experience. However, I don’t know if he’s really an upgrade over Hasselbeck short term. Hasselbeck was doing pretty well up until last week and overall this year, he completed 62.7% of his passes for an average of 6.2 YPA, 7 touchdowns, and 5 interceptions. Locker has yet to show himself to be better than that.

What Locker does inherit, however, is a team in a good situation, contrary to popular belief. The Titans got destroyed last week, but it was kind of a fluky loss. They got down big before they knew what hit them thanks to special teams blunders and turnovers, allowing 28 points off a pick six, a blocked punt, a fumble, and a long punt return.

Teams off a big loss like that do pretty well the following week. Dogs are 55-27 ATS since 2002 coming off a loss of 31+ or more as a dog. Teams tend to be embarrassed, undervalued, and playing for pride off a loss like that and that should be especially true for the Titans since owner Bud Adams flipped out after the loss and basically said anyone could lose their job. Meanwhile, this line has shifted one point, from -5 to -6, after Tennessee’s loss, a sign that they’re undervalued even though, in reality, it was several fluky blunders that doomed them, not anything to do with their talent level. This line movement also happened in spite of Miami losing as road favorites in Indianapolis.

Speaking of Miami losing as road favorites in Indianapolis, teams are 24-35 ATS as home favorites of 3+ off a loss as road favorites since 2002. Meanwhile, Miami hosts divisional Buffalo on Thursday Night next week, something that could distract them. Favorites just 23-35 ATS before a divisional Thursday Night game since 1989, 14-23 ATS before being divisional favorites.

We are getting some line value with the Dolphins. The yards per play differential method gives us a real line of -5 and the rate of sustaining drives differential method gives us a real line of -9.5 and when you average those out, it’s higher than the -6 this line is in actuality. The Titans have gotten blown out an awful lot this year and have the league’s worst points differential, worse than Kansas City, worse than divisional Jacksonville, worse than anyone. However, that’s more of just a reason why this isn’t a big play than why I’m not taking Tennessee. I like the spot the Titans are in and I don’t think Miami is a team that’s built to consistently blow people out.

Public lean: Miami (new thing I’m adding, siding with the odds makers on bets is not a bad thing to do since they make so much money, so I’m listing this here to allow readers to “fade” the public, if they so choose, in this example, the odds makers win if Tennessee covers)

Sharps lean: TEN 8 MIA 3

Final update: No change.

Miami Dolphins 20 Tennessee Titans 17

Pick against spread: Tennessee +6 (-110) 2 units

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Tennessee Titans: Week 10 NFL Power Rankings (#27)

Last week: 25 (-2)

Record: 3-6

The Titans have won 3 games by a combined 7 points and lost 6 by a combined 133 points, giving them a league worst points differential of -126. After allowing 317 points all of last year, 8th best in the league, they’ve allowed 308 through 9 games this year, by far the worst. However, last week it wasn’t really their defense’s problem. The Bears jumped out to a 28-2 lead thanks to a punt block touchdown, a pick six, and two short touchdown drives off of a fumble recovery and a long punt return. In fact, the Titans’ defense actually scored before the offense did, forcing a safety. The Bears scored 28 points on 54 yards and while the Titans allowed another 22 after that, the game was out of reach at that point and they likely weren’t giving it 100%, which is understandable.

Studs

C Fernando Velasco: Didn’t allow a pressure on 39 pass block snaps, run blocked for 43 yards on 7 attempts

RT David Stewart: Allowed 1 quarterback hurry on 39 pass block snaps, run blocked for 12 yards on 3 attempts

LOLB Zach Brown: 9 solo tackles, 7 stops, 1 missed tackle, allowed 2 catches for 8 yards on 2 attempts

ROLB Akeem Ayers: Allowed 1 catch for 5 yards on 1 attempt, 6 solo tackles, 1 assist, 5 stops, 1 penalty, 1 sack, 1 quarterback hit, and 1 quarterback hurry on 3 blitzes

LE Derrick Morgan: 2 quarterback hits and 4 quarterback hurries on 30 pass rush snaps, 1 batted pass, 3 solo tackles, 1 assist, 3 stops

DT Sen’Derrick Marks: 1 quarterback hit and 2 quarterback hurries on 29 pass rush snaps, 1 batted pass, 5 solo tackles, 5 stops

Duds

WR Kendall Wright: Caught 2 passes for 30 yards on 6 attempts on 20 pass snaps, 1.0 YAC per catch, 1 drop

TE Jared Cook: Caught 2 passes for 6 yards on 5 attempts on 30 pass snaps, 1.5 YAC per catch, 1 drop

CB Jason McCourty: Allowed 5 catches for 90 yards and a touchdown on 7 attempts, 1 penalty, 5 solo tackles, 1 assist, 3 stops

MLB Colin McCarthy: Allowed 3 catches for 68 yards on 3 attempts, 4 solo tackles, 2 stops

FS Michael Griffin: Allowed 2 catches for 18 yards and 2 touchdowns on 2 attempts, 1 penalty, 1 solo tackle, 1 missed tackle

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Chicago Bears at Tennessee Titans: Week 9 NFL Pick

Chicago Bears (6-1) at Tennessee Titans (3-5)

This was the toughest game of the week for me. At first glance, this looked like a trap line which is normally a good thing to bet against when sportsbetting online. There is heavy public action on Chicago and yet the line is falling (it opened at -5 and -4.5 and now it’s at -4 and -3.5). However, normally I like to find a trend or a few in the other team’s favor with potential trap lines and I had trouble finding one for Tennessee.

Tennessee is coming off a home overtime loss. Teams are 81-62 ATS in this spot since 1989. However, teams off a home overtime loss as favorites are just 44-38 ATS since 1989, which isn’t as strong. In fact, as dogs off a home overtime loss as favorites, teams are just 20-24 ATS. As home dogs, they are 3-0 ATS, which isn’t a very big sample size at all. There may be something there that says to take Tennessee, but it isn’t strong.

Often times what I like to do when I can’t find a trend for a team coming off an overtime game of any kind is I like to substitute overtime for just close games in general, meaning games decided by a touchdown or less. That didn’t help me much. Teams are 281-246 ATS off a home loss of 7 or fewer since 2002. Going down to 2008, that trend is 118-111 ATS. Off a close home loss as favorites, teams are 71-61 ATS and as dogs off a close home loss as favorites, teams are 41-30 ATS. Off a divisional close home loss as favorites, teams are 11-12 ATS as dogs the following week, including 28-34 ATS since 2002. As home dogs, that trend is 5-3 ATS and when we go back to 1989 to get a bigger sample size, the trend is just 12-14 ATS. Again, there may be something there, but it isn’t strong.

The only “strong” trend in found in Tennessee’s favor is that road favorites are just 5-13 ATS since 1989 off back to back home wins as favorites in which they failed to cover, which is the case for Chicago. Again, it’s a very small sample. To get a bigger sample size, I looked at teams in general coming off back to back home wins as favorites in which they failed to cover and teams are 15-22 ATS. When I expanded to teams coming off back to back wins in general in which they didn’t cover, that trend is 44-48 ATS. Once again, there may be something there, but it’s not strong.

Furthermore, we aren’t getting line value with the Titans. Using the traditional yards per play differential method, this line should be Chicago -1.5 because Chicago is actually a very average team in yards per play differential, so using just that method, it does appear we have line value with the Titans. A lot of sharps do use that method, which is why sharps may be on the Titans this week, but I don’t use just that method.

I created another statistic called rate of sustaining drives differential, which compares how often on a given set of downs you convert for a 1st down or a score, as opposed to how often your opponent does so. This statistic underrates teams that get a lot of big plays and/or don’t allow a lot of big plays, but those are the exact same teams yards per play differential underrates. Big plays are great, but you need to be able to stay on the field offensively or get off the field defensively. Meanwhile, sustaining drives is great and limiting your opponent’s ability to do so is great, but if your offense has no explosion and you’re allowing a lot of big plays, that’s not good. I think these statistics work really well in tandem.

Using that method, we see that Chicago should actually be -8.5. I’m not saying either one is right, but it’s smart to use both to find teams that one statistic under or overrates. In this case, there appears to be no line value either way and if there is, it’s actually in favor of Chicago, because when you average out these two numbers, you get -5.

On top of that, Tennessee has the league’s worst points differential at -95, excluding Kansas City, who surpassed them with their showing on Thursday Night Football. That’s because of their horrific defense. They rank 27th against the pass, 26th against the run, allow 32.1 points per game, 2nd worst in the league, and just made Ryan Fitzpatrick look like a franchise quarterback 2 weeks ago. Going back to rate of sustaining drives, they’re one of 2 teams with an opponent’s rate of sustaining drives higher than 80% as they sit at 84.4%, meaning on any given set of downs, they allow a first down or a score 84.4% of the time. That’s worst in the league. The Saints are next worst at 82.9%. They’re horrendous. Meanwhile, Chicago is one of the top teams in the league.

The Titans also come from an inferior conference (the NFC is 20-12 against the AFC) and they will once again be missing stud left tackle Michael Roos. Replacement Mike Otto was surprisingly good in his first start last week, but there’s no guarantee that will continue, especially since he’ll be matched up with Julius Peppers this week. I can’t take Chicago because of the trap line potential, but it’s a very small play on Tennessee. If I did 0-unit picks, this would be one of them.

Public lean: Chicago (new thing I’m adding, siding with the odds makers on bets is not a bad thing to do since they make so much money, so I’m listing this here to allow readers to “fade” the public, if they so choose, in this example, the odds makers win if Tennessee covers)

Sharps lean: CHI 10 TEN 8

Final update: One injury update: Michael Roos will play. I still don’t have a good feel for this game though and neither do the sharps apparently. I’d pick Tennessee if I had to, but it’d be ranked dead last in any confidence pools.

Chicago Bears 23 Tennessee Titans 20

Pick against spread: Tennessee +4 (-110) 1 unit

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

http://delivery.switchadhub.com/adserver/tag.php?_t=1196&_i=7165&_c=INSERT_CLICK_MACRO&_r=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER

<iframe id=’ef6c3b’ name=’ef6c3b’ src=’http://delivery.switchadhub.com/adserver/tag.php?_t=2193&_i=7165&_c=INSERT_CLICK_MACRO&_r=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER’ frameborder=’0′ scrolling=’no’ width=’300′ height=’600’><br /> <a href=’http://delivery.switchadhub.com/adserver/tag.php?_t=3194&_n=ef6c3b&_i=7165&_c=INSERT_CLICK_MACRO&_r=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER’ target=’_blank’><br /> <img src=’http://delivery.switchadhub.com/adserver/tag.php?_t=4191&_n=ef6c3b&_i=7165&_c=INSERT_CLICK_MACRO&_r=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER’ border=’0′ alt=” /></a><br /> </iframe>

Tennessee Titans: Week 9 NFL Power Rankings (#25)

Last week: 25 (-3)

Record: 3-5

The Titans were overrated going into their overtime loss to the Colts last week. Despite their 3-4 record, they had the league’s worst points differential, winning 3 games by a combined 7 points and losing 4 by a combined 96 points. That’s continued into this week as they are now a league worst -95. They also rank 28th in yards per play differential and 31st in rate of sustaining drives differential. Their defense has been particularly bad. They’re one of 2 teams with an opponent’s rate of sustaining drives higher than 80% as they sit at 84.4%, meaning on any given set of downs, they allow a first down or a score 84.4% of the time. The Saints are next worst at 82.9%.

Studs

QB Matt Hasselbeck: 22 of 29 for 236 yards and a touchdown, 1 throw away, 3 drops, 115.8 adjusted QB rating, pressured on 8 of 32 drop backs (2 sacks, 1 scramble, 4 of 5, 1 throw away)

LT Mike Otto: Did not allow a pressure on 36 pass rush snaps, 1 penalty, run blocked for 7 yards on 3 attempts

LG Steve Hutchinson: Did not allow a pressure on 36 pass rush snaps, run blocked for 20 yards on 2 attempts

C Fernando Velasco: Allowed 1 quarterback hurry on 36 pass rush snaps, run blocked for 35 yards on 8 attempts

RT David Stewart: Allowed 1 quarterback hurry on 35 pass rush snaps, run blocked for 3 yards on 2 attempts

CB Alterraun Verner: Allowed 7 catches for 39 yards on 7 attempts, 7 solo tackles, 1 assist, 5 stops

CB Jason McCourty: Allowed 2 catches for 24 yards on 5 attempts, 2 pass deflections, 1 solo tackle, 1 stop

ROLB Akeem Ayers: 4 solo tackles, 3 stops, 1 missed tackle, 1 penalty, 1 sack, 1 quarterback hit, and 2 quarterback hurries on 9 pass rush snaps, 1 batted pass, was not thrown on

FS Michael Griffin: 6 solo tackles, 2 assist, 1 missed tackle, did not allow a completion on 2 attempts, 1 interception

LE Derrick Morgan: 1 sack, 2 quarterback hits, and 7 quarterback hurries on 39 pass rush snaps, 1 batted pass, 1 solo tackle, 1 assist, 1 stop

RE Kamerion Wimbley: 1 sack, 2 quarterback hits, and 6 quarterback hurries on 38 pass rush snaps, 2 solo tackles, 2 stops

Duds

CB Ryan Mouton: Allowed 7 catches for 94 yards and a touchdown on 7 attempts, 5 solo tackles, 1 stop

DT Jurrell Casey: Did not record a pressure on 32 pass rush snaps, no tackles

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Indianapolis Colts at Tennessee Titans: Week 8 NFL Pick

Indianapolis Colts (3-3) at Tennessee Titans (3-4)

The winner of this game between the Colts and Titans will either be over .500 or at .500 and well in contention for a playoff spot in the AFC. I told you the AFC sucks. The Titans, however, will be hurt in this quest to do so this week by an injury that isn’t getting a lot of attention. Titans’ left tackle Michael Roos had an appendectomy this week and is very unlikely to play.

The casual bettor doesn’t know who he is most likely, which is why this line hasn’t accounted for that loss, but his absence will be huge. Roos is one of the best left tackles in the league. He has been for years and he’s once again playing like it this year, allowing just 2 sacks, 3 quarterback hit, and 10 quarterback hurries, while committing 4 penalties. He’s ProFootballFocus’ 9th ranked offensive tackle. On an offensive line that is generally playing poorly this season, his absence is going to be huge.

Indianapolis, meanwhile, is moving in the opposite direction injury wise, finally. They’ve already had the most defensive injuries in the league this year, aside from the Redskins and maybe the Jets. Dwight Freeney went down early week 1. He’s back and playing well. Pat Angerer missed the first 5 games of the season and was a rotational player last week. He’ll start this week. Vontae Davis, who missed several games, is back. Cory Redding, whose missed the last game and a half, will play this week.

Robert Mathis has yet to practice, but they haven’t ruled him out and in his absence, 2010 1st round pick Jerry Hughes has been quietly playing very well. On a defense that is generally devoid of talent, they’ve had pretty much every single one of their solid players miss time this year, except for Antoine Bethea and maybe Jerraud Powers.

They won’t be a good defense or anything now that they’re all healthy, but they’ll be much more respectable. Right now, they rank 20th against the pass, 28th against the run, and 24th in scoring, while forcing just 3 takeaways, by far worst in the league. That number should increase now that everyone is healthy. It normally evens out over time anyway. They are -9 in turnover differential right now, but all teams team to average the same turnover differential on a weekly basis regardless of what their previous turnover differential was. For more on that, click here.

Tennessee also can’t stop anyone and it’s not because of injuries. They rank 26th against the pass, 22nd against the run, allow a league worst 34.0 points per game, and just made Ryan Fitzpatrick look like a franchise quarterback. They’re horrendous. They may be 3-4, but those 3 wins have come by a combined 7 points against a Pittsburgh team that sucks on the road and who lost to Oakland, the Bills, and the Lions (doesn’t look as good now as it did then).

Meanwhile, their 4 losses have come by a combined 96 points, leading to them having the league’s worst points differential at -89, worse than Jacksonville, worse than Cleveland, worse than Kansas City, worse than Carolina, worse than Oakland, you name it. The Colts aren’t going so well in that department either, at -41 despite their 3-3 record, but that’s not as bad and injuries can be to blame. There’s no way Tennessee deserves to be more than a field goal favorites here, especially given these two team’s injury situations.

These two teams are even in yards per play differential, which translates to a real line of -3 (3 points for home field advantage) using that method. However, Indianapolis ranks 18th in rate of sustaining drives differential, while Tennessee ranks 30th. Indianapolis is at -1.4% and Tennessee is at -11.0%. If you take the difference and divide by 1.5 and add 3 points for home field, you get that this line should be Indianapolis -3.5. Either way, getting more than a field goal with the Colts in this game is ridiculous.

The trends also work against Tennessee. Indianapolis is in a good spot as dogs before being favorites as teams are 84-46 ATS in this spot since 2011. They host the Dolphins next week. Meanwhile, Tennessee is favorites off of back-to-back wins as dogs by a touchdown or less. Teams are 15-23 ATS in this spot since 1989. It makes sense. Favorites tend to be overconfident and overvalued and maybe even exhausted off of two straight close wins as dogs. Meanwhile, home favorites off a win of 1-3 as road dogs are 24-46 ATS since 2002. Tennessee won by 1 in Buffalo last week.

I’ve said in past picks this week that I’d be reckless to pick a public dog this week, with one exception, because the odds makers will want the gap between favorites and dogs to close (dogs are 63-39 ATS this year and neither dogs or favorites have finished 10 games or more above .500 in at least the last 10 years), but they’ll also want to win money, as usual. Favorites that are not publicly backed kill two birds with one stone for the odds makers and given how rich these guys always end up, you don’t want to be one of those birds. I said the only exception was Washington, for a small play, because I loved them in that spot.

That being said, I lied, sort of. When I first made this pick, there wasn’t a significant lean either way (the odds makers always win when there’s no significant lean because of the juice). Right now, there’s a slight lean on Indianapolis. It’s really slight and I still really like Indianapolis this week for a significant play, but I do final updates on Saturday and if the lean still remains or becomes more significant, I might drop down to 2 units. For now though, I really like Indianapolis this week as the better, healthier team in the better spot.

Public lean: Indianapolis (new thing I’m adding, siding with the odds makers on bets is not a bad thing to do since they make so much money, so I’m listing this here to allow readers to “fade” the public, if they so choose, in this example, the odds makers win if Tennessee covers)

Sharps lean: IND 15 TEN 8

Final update: Another big play matching up with a sharps lean. Good sign. Still a slight public lean on Indianapolis, but I’m not going to be dropping any units. The public lean didn’t increase.

Indianapolis Colts 31 Tennessee Titans 24 Upset Pick +165

Pick against spread: Indianapolis +3.5 (-110) 3 units

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Washington Redskins at Pittsburgh Steelers: Week 8 NFL Pick

Washington Redskins (3-4) at Pittsburgh Steelers (3-3)

In a couple other of my picks this week, I said it would be reckless to pick a heavily public backed dog this week with one exception. Dogs are 63-39 ATS on the season. You might think, that’s a reason to take the dog, but eventually that’s going to even out. Dating back over the last decade, dogs or favorites have not finished more than 10 games over .500 over the course of an entire year. It’s smart to ride the correction going forward and take more favorites than dogs, particularly favorites that are not publicly backed because those teams covering would have a double benefit for odds makers. It would allow the dogs/favorites disparity to even out and also they’d make money.

I tried to pick as many favorites as I could last week. I just didn’t like a lot of them. This week, I do like a lot more, so I’ll pick more favorites this week. Last week, favorites were 7-6 ATS, which looks like the start of a correction. It might not look like it totally, but remember, favorites were 12-1 SU. 5 of those covers were backdoor, including two ridiculous ones: Jim Harbaugh declining a safety on Thursday Night and the Lions driving for a backdoor cover with 30 seconds left on Monday Night against a 6.5 point spread when they hadn’t scored all night (both went against me on two instances I actually did pick favorites).

Well, this game is that one exception and it’s only because there is so much working for Washington in this one. For starters, they’ve been awfully unlucky this season. All 4 of their losses have come by a touchdown or less and 3 in three of them the Redskins had a significant contributor go down with injury who is now healthy. Against St. Louis, they lost top cornerback Josh Wilson. Against Washington, they lost top offensive lineman Trent Williams. Against Atlanta, they lost quarterback Robert Griffin.

All 3 of those guys are healthy now. They’re also missing several other players with injury like Brian Orakpo, Adam Carriker, Fred Davis, Jammal Brown, and Pierre Garcon, but they’ve played pretty well without those 4 all season. This week, they could be without London Fletcher for the first time in forever, but their defense isn’t the reason they’re playing well. They’re already allowing 28.6 points per game.

They also are expected to finally get Brandon Meriweather back from injury, which will help their horrific safety corps. They should be able to keep this one close even if they lose. So I like that we’re getting more than 4 points with them, even though both measures of real line suggest there’s no real line value either way as both calculate a real line of Pittsburgh -5.

2 big trends are in Washington’s favor too. Road dogs off of a road loss are 93-58 ATS since 2007 and Washington lost in New York last week. Meanwhile, dogs before being favorites are 84-46 ATS since 2011. Washington hosts Carolina next week. On top of those two trends, the NFC is clearly the superior conference right now. They are 19-9 in head-to-head competition with the AFC, including 17-11 ATS and 7-0 ATS as dogs. Pittsburgh isn’t playing like their normal selves right now so they don’t deserve to be more than 3 point favorites over any average or better team from the NFC.

Speaking of the Steelers not playing like their normal selves right now, a lot of that has to do with Troy Polamalu’s absence. Since 2009, the Steelers are 8-9 in games without Troy Polamalu and allow 21.4 points per game. With him, they are 27-8, allowing 14.4 points per game. He’s already been ruled out for this week. Much is being made about the Steelers’ win over the Bengals in Cincinnati as a reason for why they are “back,” but I’m not very impressed with a 7 point win over a Bengals team that’s lost 3 straight, including to the Browns. The Bengals have never beaten a playoff team in the Andy Dalton era and this year, they’ve only beaten the Browns, Jaguars, and these Bengals (in that game that Williams got hurt).

They’ll still an average team, maybe slightly better until Polamalu returns. They’re also expected to be without right tackle Marcus Gilbert again, which hurts because replacement Mike Adams has really struggled. Both backs Rashard Mendenhall and Isaac Redman could be out again and replacement Jonathan Dwyer has been really up and down this year. I hate betting on a heavily public dog in general, especially this week, which is why it’s a small play, but I like the Redskins.

Public lean: Washington (new thing I’m adding, siding with the odds makers on bets is not a bad thing to do since they make so much money, so I’m listing this here to allow readers to “fade” the public, if they so choose, in this example, the odds makers win if Pittsburgh covers)

Sharps lean: WAS 14 PIT 8

Final update: No change.

Pittsburgh Steelers 27 Washington Redskins 24

Pick against spread: Washington +4.5 (-110) 2 units

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Tennessee Titans: Week 8 NFL Power Rankings (#22)

Last week: 22 (+6)

Record: 3-4

If the Titans beat the Colts in Tennessee this week, the Titans will be 4-4 in the crappy AFC and then anything can happen. Given that I picked them to make the playoffs before the season, I obviously would like to see that happen, but I don’t think it will. I picked them to do so because of a strong defense and an improved offense with Jake Locker. Well, their defense is the league’s worst allowing 34 points per game. I’m still baffled how they went from 8th in the league last year to dead last, but they can’t make the playoffs if they can’t get their defense somehow turned around. Despite their record, they are -89 in points differential, worst in the league. All 3 of their wins have come by 3 or fewer, while their 4 losses were by a combined 96 points, with each one coming by at least 21 points.

Studs

RB Chris Johnson: Rushed for 195 yards (35 after contact) and 2 touchdowns on 18 attempts, 3 broken tackles, caught 1 pass for 3 yards on 1 attempt

QB Matt Hasselbeck: 22 of 33 for 205 yards and a touchdown, 3 throw aways, 2 drops, 98.9 adjusted QB rating, pressured on 11 of 35 drop backs (2 sacks, 3 of 9, 3 throw aways, 1 drop)

RE Kamerion Wimbley: 1 sack and 4 quarterback hurries on 34 pass rush snaps, 3 solo tackles, 1 assist, 3 stops

Duds

FS Michael Griffin: Allowed 3 catches for 54 yards and a touchdown on 3 attempts, 7 solo tackles

MLB Will Witherspoon: 1 solo tackle, 1 assist, 1 stop, 1 missed tackle, allowed 1 catch for 6 yards on 1 attempt

DT Jurrell Casey: Did not record a pressure on 28 pass rush snaps, 1 assist

K Rob Bironas: 6 kickoffs, 2 touchbacks, 63.2 yards per kickoff, 39.5 opponent’s average starting distance

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]