Mason Foster Scout

 

Outside Linebacker

Washington

6-1 245

Draft board overall prospect rank: #62

Draft board overall outside linebacker rank: #5

Overall rating: 76 (late 2nd)

40 time: 4.70

4/23/11: All the hype at Washington has been surrounding their quarterback Jake Locker. However, even with their terrible record in recent years, they still have managed to have 2 day 2 prospects on their roster. Mason Foster is that other day 2 prospect. Like stats? How about these: 162 tackles, 106 unassisted, 14 tackles for loss, 6.5 sacks, 3 passed deflected. That’s one season for Mason Foster, his senior year.

He’s a three year starter, putting up 105 tackles in 2008 and 80 in 2009. He’s a leader on defense, a great motor, high character, vocal leader. He takes great routes to the ball and has very nice run instincts. He doesn’t have the best athleticism, but he gets by. He’s more of a run stuffer than a sideline to sideline guy and he doesn’t cover that well, but he can play both outside and inside in a 4-3 and inside in a 3-4. He’s consistent as well. His season low in tackles: 9.

I think he’ll be an above average starter at the next level, someone who racks up 100+ tackles every year, provides leadership, and does all the things he needs to for you to win the game. He’s a strong character guy who can play special teams if need be, but I think he’s good enough as a linebacker that it shouldn’t need be.

NFL Comparison: DeMeco Ryans 

 

Mid Round Value Picks

 

I have broken my sleepers into 4 categories this year. Mid Round Upside Picks, Mid Round Value Picks, Late Round Upside Picks, Late Round Value Picks. A Mid Round Value Pick, as I will list here, is anyone available in the mid rounds (8th-12th) of a 12 team draft, that doesn’t have the upside of a high upside sleeper, but is just flat out being overlooked. They are a relatively safe pick that you can count on to be worth slightly more than the round you draft them in.

All average draft position (ADP) stats are as of 9/1/10 and were found at ESPN.com. ADP stats serve to provide you an estimate of when you should take these players and when you can expect them to be off of the board and thus ADP stats are crucial when dealing with upside and value picks.

TE Zach Miller- OAK

ADP: 117th

Jason Campbell loves to throw to his tight ends. In his first 2 years with Jason Campbell at quarterback, Chris Cooley had yards totals of 786 and 849, both of which were career highs at the time. He only managed 1 touchdown in 2008, but with 8 the year before it’s safe to say 2008 was a fluke in terms of touchdowns. In 2009, despite leaving midway through his 7th game with an injury and going down for the season, Cooley still had 29 catches for 332 yards and 2 scores. In 2009, despite not playing extensively until Cooley got hurt midway through his 7thgame, Fred Davis had 48 catches for 509 yards and 6 scores. Combine those stats with Cooley’s and Washington tight ends had 77 catches for 841 yards and 8 scores last year. Not bad. With Jason Campbell now in Oakland, Zach Miller figures to have a great year. Miller is as talented, if not more talented than Davis and Cooley. In his last 2 years, despite playing with an ugly mix of JaMarcus Russell, Charlie Frye, and Bruce Gradkowski at quarterback, Zach Miller has averaged 61 catches and 792 yards per season. With Jason Campbell at quarterback now, he has a chance to approach 900 yards. Zach Miller has never been much of a touchdown threat, but that’s not really his fault. He may only have 4 touchdowns over the last 2 years, but that’s because the Raiders have only had 23 receiving touchdowns over the last 2 years. In fact, Miller was actually 2nd on the team in touchdowns last year with 3. Now that they have a quarterback who can actually lead and complete drives to the end zone, Miller should be more in that 5-7 range. At 6-5, you’d figure he’d be their best goal line threat.

TE Greg Olsen- CHI

ADP: 135th

I had Greg Olsen as a potential top 5 tight end last year. That didn’t happen, he was 10th, but I’m not giving up on him this year. Jay Cutler loves to throw to his tight ends. In Cutler’s last two years in Denver, tight end Tony Scheffler had a total of 89 catches for 1194 yards and 8 scores. For comparison’s sake, he had 31 catches for 416 and 2 scores last year with Kyle Orton. Cutler is now in his 2nd year in Chicago, with Chicago’s receivers, and that can only help Olsen this year. Also, Mike Martz is now Chicago’s offensive coordinator, so Chicago should be throwing a bit more this year, also a good thing for Olsen. Olsen is the type of vertical threat tight end that is built to succeed in Martz’ scheme. He’s also only 25 so the former 1st rounder probably hasn’t reached his full potential yet. Expect him to increase the 60 catches for 612 yards and 8 scores he has last year.

 

WR Mohamed Massaquoi- CLE

ADP: 148th

8/31/10: Delhomme has actually looked decent this preseason and while I don’t recommend drafting Delhomme, it definitely a good sign for Massaquoi, Delhomme’s #1 receiver.

Someone has to lead the Browns in receiving yards…right? Massaquoi was that guy last year and with a full season as their #1 receiver, he should increase his stats. He wasn’t their number one until week 4 last year. Take his stats from the last 13 games and extrapolate them across 16 games and you get 39 catches for 735 yards and 4 scores. I think that’s his floor. He, essentially, had those stats as a rookie with crap at quarterback. This year, he’s not a rookie and there’s a slight chance the Browns won’t have crap at quarterback this year. I mean you never know. Maybe Jake Delhomme will find his old form. It’s highly unlikely, but Massaquoi looks like a guy with a floor of about 700 yards, 4-6 scores, and a ceiling that’s higher than that. That makes him a WR4 with upside and a guy who can be plugged into your lineup on occasion. He’s not being drafted as that.

WR Lee Evans- BUF

ADP: 108th

Lee Evans was awful last year with a career low 44 catches for a career low 612 yards. However, that’s because he was the #2 receiver to Terrell Owens on an awful offense. TO is now gone and Evans is the main man again. I know getting Buffalo’s “main man” shouldn’t should too exciting because, yes, Buffalo is going to suck this year. However, they’ve sucked all of Lee Evans career, particularly at the quarterback position. That didn’t stop him from getting 1292 yards in 2007, 849 yards in 2008, and 1017 yards in 2009. He could pass that 1000 yard mark again.

RB Tim Hightower

ADP: 121st

8/31/10: For the 3rd straight week, Hightower was the Cardinals’ starter at running back. Even if he isn’t the starter during the season, in favor of Chris Wells, he should get his fair share of carries because Coach Ken Whisenhunt loves his pass catching and pass blocking skills. Love him as a high upside RB4. 

8/24/10: Hightower got the start again but only managed 3 yards on 5 carries. Still, the start is more important for fantasy purposes. 

8/15/10: For his value, Hightower is a solid pickup as he’s going in the 110s on average. I wouldn’t mind having this guy as my RB4 in the 9th or 10th round. Wells is injury prone which means Hightower could get a start or two this season and the Cardinals made it clear in their first preseason game that they plan on using Hightower in some significant form this year. He’s a great pass catcher and Matt Leinart loves to checkdown. 

WR Jabar Gaffney

ADP: 139th

8/24/10: Gaffney has been used in the #1 receiver role in Denver this preseason and had 6 catches for 98 yards on 7 targets in his 2nd preseason game. It appears it will be him, not Demaryius Thomas or Eddie Royal who is the impact receiver in Denver this year. Gaffney had 21 catches for 282 yards and 2 score in his final 2 regular season games last year.

 

WR Derrick Mason

ADP: 118th 

8/24/10: Despite all the new weapons the Ravens gave Joe Flacco this offseason, he’s still doing what he knows how to do best in the preseason, throwing it to Derrick Mason. Mason only has one season of 1000 yards or less in the past 10 years and could challenge for another 1000 yard season this year, even with all these new weapons around him. Even if he doesn’t get 1000 yards, he’ll be close and he’s extremely undervalued this year.

RB Leon Washington

ADP: 143rd

9/3/10: Washington has been Seattle’s best runner this preseason and sat for rest purposes in the Seahawks 4th preseason game. They have big plans for him and I expect him to be their lead back, though they will use 3 different backs frequently this year. He’s also a great pass catcher.

 

 

Myron Rolle

 

Safety 

Florida State

6-2 215

40 time: 4.68

Draft board overall prospect rank: #91

Draft board safety rank: #10

Overall rating: 75*

3/2/10: He had two questions around him coming into this draft preseason: is he committed to the sport and how would he fare after a year away from the game? He answered the first questions alright and, from his interviews, appeared committed, but a 4.68 40 at 6-2 215 shows he may not be quite in football shape yet.  

1/30/10: He didn’t play a ton or have any signature moments, but he really did show that he is still in great shape on the plays when he did play and in his interview he really seemed committed to the sport. Both of these are good things for him. There was never an issue about his ability to play the game, just about how he would bounce back physically after a year off, and about his commitment.

1/26/10: Good to see he stayed in shape in his year away from football. 

1/23/10: A big question mark after taking a year off of football to study at Oxford. He has top 15 pick talent, but taking a year off of football, isn’t unclear how he’ll respond. We’ll get a chance to see him at the Senior Bowl next week and his stock could end up anywhere from a 2nd to 5th round prospect based off of the results of his Senior Bowl week, his combine, and his workouts. There’s also a possibility that he’s not fully committed to football as he has aspirations of being a neurosurgeon (not that there’s anything wrong with that) and that’s a red flag to NFL scouts, but just showing up to the Senior Bowl could cool that red flag a bit.

            7/23/09: Myron Rolle is a complicated prospect. On paper he should be a first round lock. He’s big, 6-2 218, fast, mid 4.4s 40, smart and a great leader on the field from the safety position. There are no holes in his game. However, I don’t think he is going to go in the first round. Rolle skipped his senior season of college, though he had already graduated, and his last season of NCAA eligibility, to go attend Oxford, after winning the Rhodes Scholarship, in hopes of being a neurosurgeon. Not that this is a bad thing at all, but he has shown on several occasions that academics means more to him than playing football. While the average person would say that he is a good kid with his priorities in order, NFL scouts see that as a red flag. Does he really want to play in the NFL? Is he committed to the game? On one occasion, he skipped a game to interview for the Rhodes Scholarship. Who’s to say that he won’t retire after 2-3 years in the league to become a neurosurgeon? If you use a first round pick on him, that could happen and you’d essentially be out a pick. Also, if he actually does declare for the NFL draft, as that is not a given at this point for him, he will have been out of football for a year, and who knows what that could do to him. I am giving him a 2nd round grade for now, as I see him as a game changer who could be a real steal in the 2nd round, but the risk is definitely still there. He has top 10 pick talent, the question is, is he committed to using it on the football field? 

NFL Comparison: Brian Dawkins (if Rolle commits to football, this is the type of special player he could be)

*=For a breakdown of what this means, click here

17-32 2012

1-16 17-32

 

17. Cincinnati Bengals- WR Michael Floyd (Notre Dame)

Joe Reedy of the Cincinnati enquirer named Michael Floyd, Mark Barron, Melvin Ingram, Quinton Coples, and Michael Brockers as the possibilities for the Bengals here. Reedy knows his stuff. He reported before the draft last year that the Bengals’ targets would be AJ Green and Andy Dalton. Floyd is the only one of those 5 still available. He gives them a much needed compliment opposite AJ Green and will make their young, explosive offense even more explosive.

Other options: 

DE Courtney Upshaw (Alabama): Reedy didn’t mention him, but Tony Pauline thinks the Bengals will use one of their 2 picks on Upshaw because they love him. 

CB Dre Kirkpatrick (Alabama): Reedy didn’t name Kirkpatrick as an option here, but he still makes a lot of sense. He’s probably a better fit for them 21 though. 

18. Arizona Cardinals- OT Cordy Glenn (Georgia)

The Cardinals moved down feeling that one of Reiff, Floyd, and Glenn would still be available at 18 and they were right. Cordy Glenn is someone they’re infatuated with. He’s an excellent fit for their blocking scheme and they desperately need offensive line help. They have a former Steelers’ offensive coach as their offensive line coach and the Steelers have always loved big offensive linemen. In fact, Mayock mocked Glenn to the Steelers at 24. Glenn goes 18 here to Arizona and would give them an upgrade at either guard or tackle, depending on where they want to use him and free agent acquisition Adam Snyder.

Other options:

RLB Chandler Jones (Syracuse): If the Chargers stay here, rush linebacker is the most likely position. I think Jones is the most likely of all pass rushers available here. 

RLB Whitney Mercilus (Illinois): Another rush linebacker option. 

RLB Courtney Upshaw (Alabama): A 3rd rush linebacker option.

CB Dre Kirkpatrick (Alabama): Straight from the Chargers’ “what the fuck” files, which they love accessing. The Chargers love big, tall receivers and defensive backs and often draft those early. Kirkpatrick would move Quentin Jammer to safety, upgrading two positions. He’d also give them a short term upgrade at safety in a year where there aren’t a lot of good safeties to go around.

S Harrison Smith (Notre Dame): Another “what the fuck” pick. The safety class falls off a cliff after Barron and Smith so, if they can’t trade up, they may reach for Smith just to make sure they can get one of the two. Smith would fill their safety need long term. 

19. Chicago Bears- DE Chandler Jones (Syracuse)

The Bears are expected to pick the best defensive lineman available. They need help at both defensive end and defensive tackle and they’re picking in a good spot for defensive linemen. Quinton Coples and Michael Brockers are options here, but both are unavailable in this mock. That leaves them with a choice between Whitney Mercilus and Chandler Jones. Jones is a rising prospect and I have reason to believe he’ll be the pick in this situation over Mercilus.

Other options:

DE Whitney Mercilus (Illinois): Mercilus is the other defensive line option for the Bears. 

20. Tennessee Titans- DE Whitney Mercilus (Illinois)

The Titans don’t really have any pressing needs (aside from interior offensive line, which I’ll discuss later) and could address a number of different positions at this spot. They could use another defensive end because Kamerion Wimbley has never been a full time end in a 4-3 and Derrick Morgan is verging on becoming a bust so players like Nick Perry, Shea McClellin, and Whitney Mercilus are in play.

They could use another defensive tackle in the rotation with Karl Klug and Jurrell Casey so players like Dontari Poe and Jerel Worthy are in play. They lost Cortland Finnegan in free agency and, while Alterraun Verner seems capable of taking his spot in the starting lineup, Dre Kirkpatrick is still in play.

On the offensive side of the ball, they desperately need offensive line help. While Mike Munchak has insisted they won’t use a first round pick on an offensive lineman, that could prove to be untrue. Munchak was incredibly frustrated with their interior offensive line during the season, so a player like Peter Konz is in play. Meanwhile, their lack of wide receiver depth was exposed when they lost Kenny Britt last season. They could use a wide receiver like Stephen Hill or Kendall Wright to go with Nate Washington and a hopefully healthy Kenny Britt.

The player they will take at this spot is probably going to be whoever is atop their draft board, which makes this pick so tough. We obviously don’t know exactly what their draft board is going to look like, but they’re known to be interested in Whitney Mercilus. I have reason to believe he won’t get out of the top 20 and the Titans are certainly an option for him.

Other options:

WR Stephen Hill (Georgia Tech): I’ve had Hill here in recent weeks because they’ve shown a lot of interest in him, but Mercilus wasn’t available here those weeks. Mike Mayock had Hill at 20 in his mock, but Mercilus was unavailable there too. If Mercilus is gone, Hill is the most likely option. 

WR Kendall Wright (Baylor): Wright is another player they’ve shown a lot of interest in.

C Peter Konz (Wisconsin): Mike Munchak said he won’t use a first round pick on an offensive lineman. That could have been a smokescreen. They did work out Konz privately.

MLB Dont’a Hightower (Alabama): An interesting name from their private visits list, they do need a 3rd young linebacker.

DT Dontari Poe (Memphis): Poe would fill a need, but they haven’t worked him out so maybe they don’t see him as a good scheme fit. Also possible they just didn’t think he’d be available. 

21. Cincinnati Bengals- CB Dre Kirkpatrick (Alabama)

I mentioned some of the players the Bengals are supposedly interested in at 17. Dre Kirkpatrick was noticeably absent. It’s possible they may just be saving their 21st overall pick on him. The Bengals typically target one position with each pick, unless someone falls. It sounds like 17 will be a defensive lineman unless someone like Michael Floyd or Mark Barron falls. That means 21 will likely be a defensive back, likely Kirkpatrick, but worst case scenario someone like Harrison Smith.

Kirkpatrick was arrested for marijuana possession earlier this year. While the charges were dropped, teams didn’t like how he addressed the situation in interviews at The Combine and some said they didn’t feel they could trust him, which is more damaging to his stock than the arrest.

The Bengals are notorious for giving 2nd chances to guys with off the field concerns or other character red flags. Neither Jason Allen nor Nate Clements is a long term solution at cornerback and Leon Hall will be coming off of season ending surgery heading into next season. They’ve really shown a lack of depth at the position without Hall so with two first round picks, expect them to target cornerbacks fairly early.

Besides, the Bengals seem to highly value the cornerback position. They’ve spent two first round picks on cornerbacks under Marvin Lewis (Leon Hall, Jonathan Joseph) and worked out both Patrick Peterson and Prince Amukamara last season as potential replacements for Johnathan Joseph, though ultimately ended up going in another direction and trying to resign Joseph. They did not so it’s likely they take their cornerback this year fairly early.

Other options:

DE Courtney Upshaw (Alabama): Again, Pauline says they’ll use one of their picks on him, but it would be really weird if they didn’t take a cornerback in the first round. 

S Harrison Smith (Notre Dame): The Bengals may not want to get out of the first round without one of the top 2 safeties, even if it means passing on a cornerback. This is a much deeper cornerback class than safety class. 

22. Cleveland Browns- WR Kendall Wright (Baylor)

I’ve had Brandon Weeden here in recent weeks, but reports are saying that it’ll be a running back and a wide receiver in the first for the Browns. I’m not done with Weeden to the Browns. More on that later. However, if they take a running back at 4, it sounds like it’ll be a wide receiver here. Kendall Wright would be an excellent compliment, as a deep threat and slot receiver, to Greg Little, a possession, outside the numbers receivers.

Other options: 

OT Jonathan Martin (Stanford): Another young complimentary piece.

QB Brandon Weeden (Oklahoma State): They may not want to wait for Weeden.

23. Baltimore Ravens (TRADE)- MLB Dont’a Hightower (Alabama)

I can’t remember the last time I didn’t have Hightower to the Steelers. However, the Ravens are very interested in him too. I’m sure they’d love to be able to steal him away from division rival Steelers. The Lions, meanwhile, need an offensive lineman badly, but there’s better value with an offensive lineman at 29 than at 23. The Ravens surrender a 3rd round pick and grab Hightower ahead of the Steelers as a successor for Ray Lewis.

Other options:

OT Jonathan Martin (Stanford): If Detroit stays put, Jonathan Martin makes a lot of sense with the top 3 cornerbacks off the board.

DE Shea McClellin (Boise State): Defensive end is not an obvious need for the Lions, but neither was defensive tackle last year.

DE Courtney Upshaw (Alabama): Copy and paste what’s above.

DE Nick Perry (USC): Copy and paste a 3rd time 

WR Stephen Hill (Georgia Tech): An interesting option for the Ravens if they trade up. Hightower is way more likely, but I’ve heard they like Hill too and may take him as the future successor for Anquan Boldin opposite Torrey Smith. 

24. Pittsburgh Steelers- NT Dontari Poe (Memphis)

The Steelers miss out on Dont’a Hightower. However, they do have Dontari Poe fall to them. He slips because he’s a project whose tape doesn’t match up to his measurables. He’s someone who is reportedly overrated by the media and could fall on draft day. The Steelers are confident in their ability to coach up players like Poe, and rightfully so given their track record. They’ll fall in love with his upside and bring him along as their nose tackle of the future behind Casey Hampton, who will be coming off a torn ACL next season. He’ll be a 35 year old free agent next offseason as well. 

Other options:

OT Jonathan Martin (Stanford): Martin is a long shot option for Pittsburgh. They need offensive line help badly, but they don’t put a high value on the offensive line and Martin isn’t an ideal fit for what they look for in an offensive lineman.

G Kevin Zeitler (Wisconsin): Again a long shot, but he’d be a better scheme fit than Martin, albeit at a position of lesser value. He’s also probably an inferior prospect. 

 

25. Denver Broncos- DT Jerel Worthy (Michigan State)

Defensive tackle is their biggest need by far, but I’ve had other positions here at some points in the past. I’ve had a wide receiver here because Peyton Manning always had a strong say in drafts in Indianapolis and that could be the case in Denver. However, with Kendall Wright off the board, I can’t see that. Manning won’t want to wait on a project like Stephen Hill or an inferior prospect like Rueben Randle. He’s also a big fan of Eric Decker, who he asked the Colts to draft in the 3rd round in 2010. Denver snatched him up a few spots earlier.

I’ve had Dre Kirkpatrick here as well, but I can’t see him falling here anymore. If he does somehow, he’ll be snatched up in a heartbeat. The Denver Post has reported they love him. However, with Wright and Kirkpatrick gone, defensive tackle does make the most sense. The Denver Post has reported multiple times that the Broncos would love a defensive tackle at 25. They lost both of their starters at the position this offseason and neither of those two starters had a single sack last season.

The question is which defensive tackle? I see 3 options, Jerel Worthy, Kendall Reyes, and Devon Still. I’ll eliminate Still. A report said the Broncos were interested in 3 defensive tackles at 25, Brockers, Worthy, and Reyes. Still might have once been a smart pick to mock here, but his stock is falling of late. He’s a long shot for the first round now.

That leaves Reyes and Worthy. I have Worthy as a consensus better player, but it’s worth noting that they brought in Reyes for a workout and not Worthy. However, they only had 8 documented workouts so it’s possible that they either don’t put a lot of stock into private workouts or they did work out Worthy privately, but it wasn’t reported. Gun to my head, Worthy is the pick here.

Other options:

DT Kendall Reyes (Connecticut): Another defensive tackle option. An NFL network report named Brockers, Worthy, and Reyes as the 3 options for the Broncos here in terms of defensive tackles.

DT Devon Still (Penn State): Another defensive tackle option. He wasn’t named, but he’s worth mentioning as an option.

RB Doug Martin (Boise State): John Fox has never shied away from using premium picks on running backs. The need is certainly there, but Martin is a minor reach at this point for a team with bigger needs. 

26. Houston Texans- WR Stephen Hill (Georgia Tech)

Andre Johnson is on the wrong side of 30 so they need to start thinking of potential long term #1 options 3-4 years out, as well as a complimentary receiver opposite him. Kevin Walter and Jacoby Jones aren’t very good and their lack of wide receiver depth was exposed when Andre Johnson missed significant time with injury last season. I see 3 options here for the Texans, Hill, Wright, and Fleener. Wright is gone and I think they take Hill over Fleener as he is a consensus better player.

Other options:

TE Coby Fleener (Stanford): As I just mentioned, Fleener is another option here. 

OT Jonathan Martin (Stanford): They need a right tackle, but they’ve had success with mid to late round offensive linemen before. I think they believe in their scheme too much to use a first round pick on an offensive lineman. 

RLB Bruce Irvin (West Virginia): Irvin is drawing some late first round buzz. Houston could be an interested team.  

27. New England Patriots- DE Nick Perry (USC)

Marc Anderson and Andre Carter were both great one year signings this offseason, but they were also just one year signings. Anderson signed in Buffalo and the Patriots haven’t seemed too eager to resign Carter. Besides, Carter is on the wrong side of 30, coming off a major injury, and played awful in a 3-4 in Washington, a scheme that the Patriots could switch to, at least in some form, in 2012. Perry is a great pass rusher with the ability to play both the 4-3 and the 3-4. I have him over guys like Upshaw and McClellin because a source close to the Patriots named both Chandler Jones and Nick Perry as the two pass rushing options here.

Other options:

DE Shea McClellin (Boise State): Not ruling out McClellin. Belichick will like his versatility.

DE Courtney Upshaw (Alabama): Another pass rushing option. 

28. Green Bay Packers- RLB Shea McClellin (Boise State)

No playoff team had fewer sacks than the Packers, who had a mere 29. Clay Matthews is a great pass rusher, but had a poor statistical season last year because he was consistently double and triple teamed. They need someone opposite him that defenses will fear. The Packers are reportedly infatuated with Shea McClellin.

RLB Courtney Upshaw (Alabama): Another pass rushing option.

S Harrison Smith (Notre Dame): Nick Collins was cut for medical reasons. Harrison Smith will help them a lot at safety.

RB Doug Martin (Boise State): The Packers draft straight from their board, so you can’t count out an offensive player like Doug Martin, even with all of their needs defensively. 

 

29. Detroit Lions (TRADE)- OT Jonathan Martin (Stanford)

The Lions had no problem trading down because they could get a solid offensive lineman at 29. I had Martin to the Lions at 23 in a previous mock so I’m sure they’ll be very happy with him here at 29. Jeff Backus is no longer a capable left tackle and, the way his contract is set up, he’ll probably be a 35 year old free agent next offseason. Backus can play right tackle or guard next season with Martin as their long term left tackle of the future.

Other options:

G Amini Silatolu (Midwestern State): The only other player I could think of for Detroit. Martin is such a good fit at this point, but the Lions do love Silatolu. I doubt they’d take him ahead of Martin, however. He’d also be an option for the Ravens should they stay put. 

G Kevin Zeitler (Wisconsin): If the Ravens stay put and don’t take Martin themselves, Zeitler makes a lot of sense since they reportedly don’t see Konz as a fit.

C Peter Konz (Wisconsin): I’ll still list Konz as an option.

S Harrison Smith (Notre Dame): Smith is the sleeper. Both of their safeties will be free agents in a year and Ed Reed is 34 in September. They’re rumored to be interested in safeties early. 

30. San Francisco 49ers- G Amini Silatolu (Midwestern State)

Tony Pauline said the 49ers will use this pick on an offensive lineman unless Stephen Hill falls. Trent Baalke, the San Francisco 49ers’ GM, has said that his team really loves one player so I think that’s Hill, but he’s not here. Instead they’ll take an offensive lineman. Which one? Well Pauline thinks it’ll be Amini Silatolu so I’m going off that. He’d be an immediate upgrade at guard and help fix an offensive line that let Alex Smith be the most sacked quarterback in the league last year.

Other options:

G Kevin Zeitler (Wisconsin): Another guard option.

C Peter Konz (Wisconsin): Konz could play guard or move Goodwin to guard and play center. Either way, he’d be a long term solution at guard.

WR Reuben Randle (LSU): Interestingly enough, the 49ers have worked out only 3 first round prospects, all of whom were receivers. Randle is an option. 

31. Cleveland Browns (TRADE)- QB Brandon Weeden (Oklahoma State)

I said I wasn’t done with Weeden and the Browns. The Patriots love to trade down and will likely move out of one of their two 1st round picks, especially since they don’t have any picks after the 4th round. They’ve worked out a lot of late round guys so expect them to try to pick up another late round pick and probably another mid round pick, maybe even a mid-late round pick in 2013 (when they only have 5 picks). The Browns give up a combination of that to come up from 37 and grab Brandon Weeden, who they are really interested in, before another team can do the same.

Other options:

S Harrison Smith (Notre Dame): I wanted to put Smith in the first round in some form, but couldn’t fit him. If New England stays put, he makes a lot of sense. A team like Minnesota, Carolina, or Dallas could also trade up for him.

RB Doug Martin (Boise State): Another trade up option: St. Louis and Tampa Bay could be interested.

DT Kendall Reyes (Connecticut): The Patriots could also take Reyes if they stay. Carolina and St. Louis could be interested in him in a trade up. 

32. New York Giants- G Kevin Zeitler (Wisconsin)

David Diehl was one of the worst offensive tackles and one of the worst guards in the league last season. He played 10 games at guard, ranking 76th among ProFootballFocus’ 77 guards, allowing 5 sacks and 28 pressures, while committing 3 penalties. He played 6 games at tackle, ranking 64th out of 76, allowing 4 sacks and 20 pressures, while committing 2 penalties. That was just the regular season. In 20 total games, he allowed 13 sacks, 61 pressures, and committed 6 penalties, good for an overall rating of -58.1.

Right tackle Kareem McKenzie was only slightly worse, allowing 9 sacks and 58 pressures in 20 games, while committing 4 penalties, good for a -33.2 rating. McKenzie is a free agent and not expected back so they are probably moving Diehl to right tackle to compete with 2011 4th round pick James Brewer. They’ll need a new long term left guard. Zeitler is a rising prospect. Some expect him to go higher than teammate Peter Konz.

Other options: 

C Peter Konz (Wisconsin): Konz could still be the pick.

RB Doug Martin (Boise State): The Giants take best available straight from their board. Martin would also fill a need at running back.

DE Courtney Upshaw (Alabama): As I just said, they love BPA. They also never shy away from taking pass rushers. Osi Umenyiora could be traded on draft day and he’s in a contract year anyway. They’ve already lost Dave Tollefson, who played significant snaps on the defensive line, this offseason.

DE Bruce Irvin (West Virginia): Copy and paste what’s above. 

 

HTML Comment Box is loading comments…

 

 

2011 Week 18 Picks

 

Last week overall: 11-5

Last week ATS: 8-8 (+465/+7 units)

Overall picks: 165-91 (.645)

Upset Picks: 2-3 (-10/-1 unit)

ATS Picks: 108-140-8 (-12045/-89 units)

Survivor picks: 12-5 (NE, PIT, BAL, GB, NYG, PHI, NO, SF, DAL, SD, ATL, NYJ, DEN, TB, TEN, HOU, ARI)

Upset picks: 29-32 (+3170/+7 units)

Prop Bets: +188 

2010 Total: +6408

2010/2011 Total: -2279

Cincinnati Bengals 24 Houston Texans 20 Upset Pick (+130)

Pick against spread: Cincinnati +3 (-115) 2 units (-230)

Neither of these sides seems particularly good to bet on. On one hand, the Bengals are 2-6 ATS in their last 8, 3-5 SU, with wins over Arizona by 7, St. Louis by 7, and Cleveland by 3. They’re also 1-6 ATS against playoff teams this season, with that one cover coming against the Kyle Orton Broncos and they didn’t even win that one. In fact, they’re 0-7 SU against playoff teams this season (Pittsburgh twice, Baltimore twice, Houston, Denver, and San Francisco). That’s opposed to 9-0 SU against non-playoff teams. But at the same time, Houston has lost 3 straight to non-playoff teams (Carolina, Indianapolis, Tennessee).

Given that, I’m not sure if we can even count the Texans as a playoff team. They’re so banged up, especially offensively with TJ Yates starting in this one as their 3rd string quarterback and even he is going to be playing through a separated non-throwing shoulder. If anything happens to him, it’s Jake Delhomme for the Texans. As bad as the Texans have been playing, I’m not even sure how much relevance the Bengals’ record against playoff teams is.

What is relevant is that the Texans beat the Bengals in Cincinnati earlier this season, but that was 3 weeks ago and only by 1 point, taking a big, late comeback to do it. There’s also a related trend to that loss. Teams are 57-41 ATS trying to avenge a loss in the playoffs since 2002, 15-9 ATS on the road trying to avenge a home loss.

One similarity between these two teams is that they are starting rookie quarterbacks. Cincinnati is starting Andy Dalton and Houston is starting TJ Yates. Rookie quarterbacks tend to struggle in the playoffs, but I’d trust Dalton more than Yates. Besides, Yates has more pressure on him as home favorites. Quarterbacks starting their first playoff game are 6-19 SU since 2003, but 2-10 ATS as home favorites, as opposed to 5-5 ATS as road dogs. I don’t love Cincinnati, but I think they’re the right side and the better team so I like getting points with the better team.

New Orleans Saints 31 Detroit Lions 27 Lock/Survivor Pick

Pick against spread: Detroit +11 (-110) 3 units (-330)

This is another rematch. The Saints beat the Lions a few weeks ago by a score of 31-17 in New Orleans. However, Detroit was missing one of their best defensive players, defensive tackle Ndamukong Suh, due to suspension. His return will help the Lions as they try to contain Drew Brees, but they’re still not going to have a lot of success doing so. They also didn’t have Kevin Smith in that one after an early injury and I expect his return to have the bigger impact. The Saints aren’t a great run defense, but the Lions simply didn’t have anyone to take advantage of that last time as Maurice Morris struggled for 28 yards on 12 carries after Smith went down. Now they do. Smith rushed for 34 yards and a score on 6 carries before getting hurt.

There is one trend related to that loss, as teams trying to avenge a 14+ point loss are 20-11 ATS in the playoffs since 2002. Besides, it’s not like the Saints have been good as large favorites under Sean Payton with a 4-10 ATS record in those games, 4-9 ATS since the start of the 2009 season, when they really started playing at an elite level. I still like New Orleans to win, but Detroit is talented enough for a backdoor cover or even a legitimately close game here, especially with the trends on their side.

 

Atlanta Falcons 27 New York Giants 24 Upset Pick (+135)

Pick against spread: Atlanta +3 (-115) 2 units (-230)

The Giants made the playoffs, but they’re hardly playing good football right now. Eli Manning is good, as is Victor Cruz, but that’s about all they have going from them. They can rush the passer, but the rest of their defense is pretty bad and their offensive line and running game are a far cry from what they’ve been in the past.

They finished this season 3-5 after a 6-2 start with those 3 wins coming against an 8-8 Jets team that finished on a 3 game losing streak themselves and the Cowboys, who finished the season 2-7 ATS in their last 9 games. They’ve always been better in the first half than the 2nd half under Tom Coughlin, going 47-17 SU in the first half since Coughlin took over in 2004 and 27-37 SU in the second half of the season. They’ve also only won a playoff game in one season under Coughlin, missing the playoffs or being one and done in the other 7 seasons.

The Falcons, meanwhile, do tend to struggle on the road, but I really like their team. Outside of the top 6 (GB, NE, NO, SF, PIT, BAL), I give them the best chance to make a deep run in the playoffs and one team always seems to come out of Wild Card weekend and make a deeper run than most expect. I don’t know if Atlanta necessarily does that (a win here sends them to Lambeau next week), but I do like them to win here over an overrated Giants team that seems ripe for another playoff flop.

Denver Broncos 16 Pittsburgh Steelers 13 Upset Pick (+320)

Pick against spread: Denver +9 (-115) 6 units (+600)

Time travel with me for a bit. The year is 2011. The Seattle Seahawks had just made the playoffs as a 7-9 team from the NFC West, the NFL’s worst division. Everyone thought they were a joke who had no business being in the playoffs and they were 10 point home dogs for the New Orleans Saints, who was in the middle of another strong season in their quest to repeat as Super Bowl Champions. Everyone and their dog bet on New Orleans, but I recognized it as an obvious trap line.

New Orleans had struggled in the elements before and Seattle had a huge home field advantage. The Seahawks also had the “no one believes in us factor.” Besides, that was only the 2nd time all season that a team had been double digit home dogs, with the first being Carolina with Brian St. Pierre at quarterback against the eventual 12-4 Baltimore Ravens. Carolina deserved to be double digit home dogs there, but the Seahawks certainly didn’t. I picked the Seahawks to cover (one of my favorite plays of the year) and they shocked even me as they not only covered the 10.5, but won outright.

Back to 2012. Denver makes the playoffs as an 8-8 team out of an awful division, the AFC West. They’re on a 3 game losing streak, losing by a combined 88-40, including the last two against sub .500 teams, the Chiefs and the Bills. They’re playing awful. There’s no question about that. Tebow has regressed as a passer as teams have caught onto him some and John Fox’s retarded game plan which only lets Tebow throw on clear passing downs, on which throws tend to be low percentage, gets stupider by the week. The defense hasn’t been the same since Von Miller’s thumb injury. They aren’t running the ball well anymore and the offensive line has been awful, as have the receivers. But are the Steelers playing any better?

Ben Roethlisberger is clearly not healthy. They barely beat the Browns 13-9 and in Ben Roethlisberger’s last two games since the injury, they’ve beaten Cleveland 14-3 and lost to San Francisco 20-3. The only game they’ve looked good in throughout their last 4 was the St. Louis game, in which a healthy Charlie Batch led Pittsburgh to a 27-0 against an awful St. Louis team that can make almost anyone look good. Now Rashard Mendenhall is out with a knee injury as well.

Even when Ben Roethlisberger and Rashard Mendenhall were healthy, they had trouble putting away bad teams. Indianapolis only lost by 3, Jacksonville only by 4, Tyler Palko’s Kansas City Chiefs only by 4, and then of course, the two Cleveland games I mentioned. Even the biggest Tebow hater would have to agree that the Broncos are at least a little bit better than that group of jokers. Besides, the Steelers have always struggled as large favorites. Ben Roethlisberger is 3-10 ATS as road favorites of 7+, 1-8 ATS as road favorites of 9+, 5-12 ATS as non-divisional favorites of 9+ (home or away).

Like I felt last year, I feel this line could be a trap line. There have only been 8 games where the road team was favored by 9+ this season, Green Bay/Carolina, Pittsburgh/Indianapolis, Green Bay/Minnesota, Baltimore/Jacksonville, New Orleans/St. Louis, Pittsburgh/Kansas City, Green Bay/Kansas City, San Francisco/St. Louis. On paper, this game might not look that even, but it certainly looks more even than those 8 games, but Vegas is feeding off the public’s perception that the Broncos are absolute crap with this line, just like they fed (and profited) off of the public’s perception that the Seahawks were absolute crap last year. And the kicker, of those 8 teams favored by 9+ on the road, none of them covered. In fact, 3 of them lost (Baltimore in Jacksonville, New Orleans in St. Louis, Green Bay in Kansas City).

Another prominent trap line was in Super Bowl 42. The Patriots were double digit favorites on a neutral field. That line prayed on the public’s belief that the New York Giants were the worst team to ever make the Super Bowl and that the Patriots were awesome and invincible. A lot of people lost a lot of money that day, just like a lot of people lost a lot of money last year picking the Saints and a lot of people would lose a lot of money this year picking the Steelers (if this is a trap, the public is eating it up and betting heavily on the Steelers, which is a good sign.)

The most obvious sign that this line is a trap, Pittsburgh was 7 point favorites in Cleveland last week and didn’t cover. Now they’re 9 point favorites in Denver? Denver is worse than Cleveland?! Vegas isn’t stupid. This line was designed for a reason, to trap bettors into betting Pittsburgh and feed off the public jumping ship from the Tebow bandwagon.

The Broncos also have the “nobody believes in us” advantage here. Everyone is counting them out and that is an extremely powerful motivator. The Steelers could also not take them seriously, which works to their advantage as well. As bad as the Broncos have been over the past 3 weeks, they’re still 5-2 ATS as dogs under Tebow this season. They also have a big home field advantage. It’s not quite Qwest Field, but the Broncos have very loyal fans who will be very excited for their team’s first trip to the postseason since 2005.

This home field advantage will also have one more tangible, noticeable effect. In 2007, Ryan Clark made his first trip to Denver to play the Broncos and became near deathly ill. Clark has a sickle cell trait, along with another condition, which did not react well when Clark attempted to play in Denver’s high altitude. Clark lost 30 pounds, the rest of his season, and had to have his spleen removed. He did not play when the Steelers returned to Denver in 2009 and though they’re saying it’s possible he could play this week if he’s cleared by a doctor, I doubt he gets cleared and plays. After what happened last time, it’s too big of a risk. In the big picture, it’s just a football game. Assuming he doesn’t play, his absence certainly doesn’t help things for the Steelers. He’s their leading tackler.

One final parallel to last year’s Seahawks/Saints game is that the Steelers made the Super Bowl last year. Teams who make the playoffs (whether they win it or lose it) tend to struggle the following season. No defending Super Bowl Champion has won a playoff game since the Patriots in 2004 and no Super Bowl Runner Up has won the Super Bowl the next year since the 1973 Dolphins and only 2 Super Bowl Runner Ups have won playoff games since 1998 (2006 Seahawks, 2009 Cardinals).

And the final reason I like the Broncos this week is that bad teams tend to do pretty well in the playoffs. I’ve beaten the Seahawks/Saints story to death, but two other teams had average records and poor points differentials and made the playoffs (the Broncos finished -81 on the season). The 9-7 Arizona Cardinals in 1998 made the playoffs with a differential of -53. They ended up winning their road playoff game by 13 in Dallas, the franchise’s first since 1947. The 8-8 Rams made in it 2004 with a differential of -73. They ended up winning in Seattle by 7. In both cases, it could easily be argued that the bad playoff team was simply overlooked. The last 4 8-8 or 7-9 playoff teams won in the first round (St. Louis, Minnesota in 2004, San Diego in 2008, Seattle in 2010).

I’m hesitant to pick the Broncos to win straight up (although I was hesitant to pick Seattle to win straight up last year and look what happened there), but I love them to cover. The Steelers are not healthy and not playing good football and they always seem to have trouble as big favorites, especially on the road. They’ll also miss Ryan Clark’s services in the secondary, as well as Rashard Mendenhall’s at running back. This line looks like a trap line when you compare these two teams to the teams in the other 8 games which featured 9+ point road favorites this season, in which those road favorites were 0-8 ATS and just 5-3 SU. It also looks like a trap line when you see that Pittsburgh was just -7 in Cleveland last weekend and didn’t even cover.

Meanwhile, the Broncos will have a very excited crowd on their side, a huge home field advantage (high altitude is no fun for any visiting player to play in, even if it doesn’t make them near deathly ill), and the “nobody believes in us factor.” I’m expecting this to be a very close, low scoring game with the Steelers eventually prevailing, but failing to cover. The Broncos have had 12 of their 16 games decided by 7 or less (8-4 SU), while the Steelers have had 8 of 16 games decided by 8 or less (6-2 SU). Although, as long as it’s close, you never know, we might get some Tebow Time, though he’s come up empty in his last 3 tries. Couldn’t you just see him breaking off a Marshawn Lynch style Beast Mode run to win it late? I am picking the Steelers to advance though.

Sunday Morning Update: Putting 1 unit on Denver +320 to win straight up. 3 to 1 odds is too good of value. Also putting 6 on Denver +9. This is one of my favorite picks of the year.

 

 

76-100

100 Once in a decade prospect 
95-99 Elite talent 
90-95 Solid top 10 pick 
85-90 Solid first round pick 
80-85 Late 1st-early 2nd 
75-80 Solid 2nd round pick 
70-75 Solid 3rd round pick 
65-70 3rd-4th round pick 
60-65 4th-5th round pick 
55-60 5th round pick 
50-55 6th round pick 
45-50 7th round pick 
40-45 Undrafted, invite to training camp 
30-40 Career practice squader 
20-30 No NFL future 
0-20 No football future 

 

Go back to 51-75 

 

76. OLB Bruce Carter (North Carolina) 73

77. MLB Josh Bynes (Auburn) 73

78. G Rodney Hudson (Florida State) 72

79. CB Jalil Brown (Colorado) 72

80. QB Jake Locker (Washington) 72

81. QB Colin Kaepernick (Nevada) 72

82. CB Kendric Burney (North Carolina) 71

83. Ricky Stanzi Scout (Iowa) 71

84. DE/RLB Jabaal Sheard (Pittsburgh) 71

85. MLB Nate Irving (NC State) 71

86. CB Richard Sherman (Stanford) 70

87. G Clint Boling (Georgia) 70

88. RLB/OLB Chris Carter (Fresno State) 70

89. 3-4 DE/DT/NT Jarvis Jenkins (Clemson) 69

90. WR Torrey Smith (Maryland) 69

91. G John Moffitt (Wisconsin) 69

92. RLB Steven Friday (Virginia Tech) 69

93. MLB Mike Mohamed (California) 69

94. RB Derrick Locke (Kentucky) 69

95. OT Darius Morris (Temple) 69

96. WR Vincent Brown (San Diego State) 69

97. S Jeron Johnson (Boise State) 68

98. G Orlando Franklin (Miami) 68

99. DT Jurrell Casey (USC) 68

100. RB Kendall Hunter (Oklahoma State) 68

 

Go on to 101-125 

 

Aldon Smith Scout

 

Defensive End/Rush Linebacker

Missouri

6-4 263

Draft board overall prospect rank: #17

Draft board overall defensive end rank: #6

Overall rating: 87 (1st)

40 time: 4.74

4/23/11: Aldon Smith is an athletic freak who is on the rise as a draft prospect. His measurables may not make him look like an athletic freak, but on the field, it’s clear. He can run, he’s strong, and he’s fluid. He’s got 35 and 3/8 inch arms. His athleticism often gets him compared to Jason Pierre Paul who went 15th to the Giants last year. Though athletically they are comparable, I don’t like that comparison.

Jason Pierre Paul was extremely raw coming off of school. He had dominated on the junior college level, but had yet to come close to dominating on the college level at South Florida. Aldon Smith has an impressive track record in college for his age. He’s just a redshirt sophomore coming out, but he had 11.5 sacks and 19 tackles for a loss in 2009 as a redshirt freshman. His production took a hit this past season with only 6 sacks, but injuries take the blame for that. He missed 3 games with injury and wasn’t right for half the season. Given that, 6 sacks is pretty impressive. Remember, that’s exactly how many JPP had in his only year of NCAA Division-I college football.

I’m not saying Smith isn’t raw, but he’s got a track record. He needs to become more one dimensional. He’s pretty weak against the run, though experts predict that he can play in the high 270s, low 280s and still maintain his athleticism. This, of course, would only happen if he played in a 4-3. I think he has the athleticism and fluidity to play in a 3-4. He might take some time to transition because it’s a new scheme for him and he hasn’t rushed from a standing position before, or done much in coverage, I think he projects well there long term athletically.

As a pass rusher, he’s tough to block. He’s got an amazing first step, a strong motor, and a good amount of pass rushing moves. He also showed toughness, only missing 3 games with a broken leg this year. Scouts love when kids play through injury and I’m not different. It shows he’s a team player and he loves the game.

NFL Comparison: Will Smith

 

Arthur Jones

 

3-4 defensive end/defensive tackle 

Syracuse

6-4 294

40 time (projected) 5.03

Draft board overall prospect rank: #83

Draft board 3-4 defensive end rank: #8

Overall rating: 73* 

1/20/10: An amazing physical specimen who has shown flashes of brilliance on the field, but has never quite put it together enough for me to consider him a 1st round prospect. Because of a knee injury late last season, he won’t be a 1st round prospect and if his knee doesn’t check out at the combine, he could slip even more.

            9/6/09: Arthur Jones is a defensive lineman with great agility for his size, but because he’s only 294 pounds, he’s not going to be able to play defensive tackle in the NFL, with the exception of on clear passing downs, and for teams that use a cover 2 defense. Jones projects best as a 3-4 defensive end, and in my opinion he’s the best pure 3-4 defensive end in the draft class. His agility and quickness allow him to get into the backfield with ease and he has 30.5 tackles for losses over the past 2 years, an amazing stat for a defensive tackle. He’s never played 3-4 defensive end before, but his skill set translates very well to the position. He plays a lot faster than his 40 time indicates and he’s actually stronger than his weight would indicate. He’s in very good shape and should do very well on the bench press at the combine for someone of his size. Still, he’s not overall big enough to be a true space eating 4-3 defensive tackle. He makes plays all over the field, a rarity for a defensive lineman and has great chase speed. He has an amazingly high tackles total for a defensive tackle. Even though he’s in the backfield a lot, he doesn’t have a high sacks total, for whatever reason. He only had 3.5 sacks last year against average competition in the Big East, but I’m not too concerned about that because he is in the backfield on almost every play. He shows great hustle and loves the game of football. He’s constantly around the ball which I think is his best attribute as a football player. He tore his pectoral lifting weights in the offseason and scouts will keep an eye on him to make sure there are no negative lasting effects from that. His skill set and great motor suggest that he should be a first round pick lock, but he is limited position wise so he’s not a lock at this point. There are more and more teams switching to the 3-4 defense so he should go somewhere high and thrive if he goes to a team with the right system.

NFL Comparison: Tommie Harris

*=For a breakdown of what this means, click here