Cincinnati Bengals at Cleveland Browns: 2014 Week 15 NFL Pick

Cincinnati Bengals (8-4-1) at Cleveland Browns (7-6)

This line has shifted from the Bengals being favored by 1.5 earlier in the week to the Browns now being favored by 1.5. That erased a powerful trend working against the Bengals and replaced it with a powerful trend that works for the Bengals. That first trend says that road favorites are 77-120 ATS before being home underdogs since 1989 (the Bengals have the Broncos coming to town next week). The other trend says that divisional home favorites are 25-49 ATS since 2002 against a divisional opponent that they previously beat as road underdogs during that same regular season.

However, I’m still going with the Browns for a variety of reasons. The most obvious one is that that line movement isn’t that significant because it’s not only still within the field goals, but it’s between 2 points in either direction. The second reason is that the Bengals still have a really tough game against the Broncos next week. Teams are 60-94 ATS since 2012 before being 3+ point home underdogs, including 31-65 ATS before being 4+ point home underdogs (the early line is Denver -4). The Browns have a much easier game up next with a trip to Carolina on deck.

On top of that, that 25-49 ATS trend only makes sense when two teams are even. In divisional matchups where the homefield advantage decides who is the favorite, generally those two teams are essentially even. Divisional opponents that are essentially even generally split the season series. That seems to happen even if the road team pulls the upset in the first matchup, as the road underdog wins about half the time (39-38) in the rematch and covers at that aforementioned 2/3rds rate. These two teams are not even though.

They’re not uneven in the way you think either. The Browns actually rank significantly better than the Bengals this season. The Browns rank 16th in rate of moving the chains differential, moving them at a 69.36% rate, as opposed to 69.34% for their opponents, a differential of 0.02%. The Bengals, meanwhile, rank 26th, moving the chains at a 71.32% rate, as opposed to 73.85% for their opponents, a differential of -2.53%. That’s before you take into account that Johnny Manziel should upgrade the Browns’ offense in his first start. Manziel won’t necessarily be great, especially not right away, but he’ll probably be better than Hoyer, who was really struggling, leading the NFL’s 25th ranked offense in rate of moving the chains.

If their offense is even slightly improved, the Browns, with a defense that ranks 2nd in rate of moving the chains allowed, are significantly better than the Bengals. Not only does that nullify that trend in my mind, but that means we’re getting significant line value with the Browns. The final reason I still like the Browns is because that line movement is a result of the sharps being all over Cleveland this week. I agree with them and I have a good deal of confidence as long as this line is 3 or less.

Cleveland Browns 20 Cincinnati Bengals 13

Pick against the spread: Cleveland -1.5

Confidence: Medium

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

New York Jets at Tennessee Titans: 2014 Week 15 NFL Pick

New York Jets (2-11) at Tennessee Titans (2-11)

The Titans are a really bad team, moving within percentage points of a Raiders team that previously seemed untouchably in last place in rate of moving the chains, after a blowout home loss to the Giants last week. They move the chains at a 66.57% rate, as opposed to 76.11% for their opponents, a differential of -9.53% that ranks 31st (Oakland is at -9.61%). However, the Jets have no business being favored by a field goal on the road against anyone. They rank all the way down at 28th in rate of moving the chains differential, moving them at a 67.89% rate, as opposed to 72.70% for their opponents, a differential of -4.81%.

The Jets being favored by a field goal is a drastic shift from last week, when the early line had them as field goal underdogs. I love fading massive line movements because they’re almost often huge overreactions and in this case I think it’s an overreaction to the Titans 36-7 home loss to the Giants. That was an ugly loss, as was their 45-21 loss to the Texans the week before, but teams actually cover at a fairly high rate off of back-to-back losses by 21 or more points, as teams are 41-23 ATS in that spot since 2002. It might seem counterintuitive, but it makes sense when you think about it as teams are often overlooked, undervalued, and embarrassed in that spot. They’re definitely undervalued and they’ll almost definitely be overlooked and embarrassed.

Adding to the theory that the Titans will be overlooked this week is the fact that the Jets have a much bigger game next week with the Patriots coming to town. Teams are 60-94 ATS since 2012 before being 3+ point home underdogs, including 31-65 ATS before being 4+ point home underdogs, 9-24 ATS before being 7+ point home underdogs, and 1-7 ATS before being 10+ point home underdogs (the early line in New England -10.5). On top of that, road favorites are 77-120 ATS before being home underdogs since 1989. Combining the two, road favorites are 6-18 ATS before being 7+ point home underdogs since 1989. It’s a very small sample size, but the logic definitely makes sense.

The only reason this isn’t a bigger play on the Titans is because the Jets are in their 2nd straight road game this week, which is an added benefit. Teams are 46-31 ATS as road favorites off a road loss since 2008, including 38-26 ATS when it’s their 2nd straight (and not 3rd straight) road game and they next play a home game. This is because teams tend to do better in their 2nd straight road game than their first one, but lines don’t really adjust for this. Teams are 182-195 in their 2nd of two road games since 2008, getting outscored by an average of 0.32 points per game, as opposed to 269-385 in their 1st of one road game since 2008, getting outscored by an average of 3.28 points per game. However, that aforementioned 38-26 ATS trend is just 5-9 ATS since 1989 when the previous game was an overtime contest and teams in general are 79-97 ATS since 1989 off of a road overtime loss. The Titans should be the right side.

Tennessee Titans 16 New York Jets 13 Upset Pick +130

Pick against the spread: Tennessee +3

Confidence: Medium

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Dallas Cowboys at Philadelphia Eagles: 2014 Week 15 NFL Pick

Dallas Cowboys (9-4) at Philadelphia Eagles (9-4)

The Eagles won in Dallas a few weeks ago, but that doesn’t mean these two teams aren’t even. The Eagles rank 11th, moving the chains at 71.46% rate, as opposed to 70.14% for their opponents, a differential of 1.32%. The Cowboys, very similarly, rank 14th, moving the chains at a 76.11% rate, as opposed to 74.94% for their opponents, a differential of 1.17%. The Eagles’ offense has been especially bad with Mark Sanchez under center, as they’ve moved the chains at a 69.94% rate over the past 5 weeks despite playing 4 of the 7 worst defenses in the league in terms of rate of moving the chains differential (Green Bay, Carolina, Tennessee, Dallas). The reason the Cowboys lost on Thanksgiving is because they generally struggle at home, going 7-23 ATS as home favorites since 2010. The Eagles, meanwhile, are 14-27 ATS at home over that same time period.

This isn’t unique to the Cowboys and Eagles, as the whole NFC East recently has had less homefield advantage than average recently. At home, the NFC East is 73-85 since 2010, outscoring opponents by an average of0.67 points per game and going 59-96 ATS. On the road, they are 77-80, getting outscored by an average of 2.00 points per game and going 83-72 ATS. As you can imagine, road teams in NFC East divisional games tend to do well, going 25-14 ATS over that time period as divisional road underdogs.

The Eagles’ previous win in Dallas actually puts them in a bad spot this week, as divisional home favorites are 25-49 ATS since 2002 against a divisional opponent that they previously beat as road underdogs during that same regular season. It’s a weird trend and it’s a little complicated, but it makes sense when you think about it. In divisional matchups where the homefield advantage decides who is the favorite, generally those two teams are essentially even. Divisional opponents that are essentially even generally split the season series. That seems to happen even if the road team pulls the upset in the first matchup, as the road underdog wins about half the time (39-38) in the rematch and covers at that aforementioned 2/3rds rate.

I like the Cowboys’ chances of getting revenge here and even if they don’t do so by winning, this line is at 3.5 so there’s some wiggle room. Getting that extra half point is very important considering these two teams are essentially even and it’s the direct result of the Eagles’ win in Dallas two weeks ago, which we established is very explainable. The only reason this isn’t a bigger play is because the Eagles don’t have any distractions on the horizon with a trip to Washington on deck. Teams are 89-63 ATS since 2012 before being 3+ road favorites, 57-36 ATS before being 4+ road favorites, and 23-8 ATS before being 7+ road favorites (the early line is Philadelphia -8.5). I’m still taking the Cowboys and the 3 and a half.

Dallas Cowboys 24 Philadelphia Eagles 23 Upset Pick +150

Pick against the spread: Dallas +3.5

Confidence: Medium

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Tampa Bay Buccaneers at Carolina Panthers: 2014 Week 15 NFL Pick

Tampa Bay Buccaneers (2-11) at Carolina Panthers (4-8-1)

Cam Newton is out for this one with a back injury suffered in a car accident this week. That caused this line to move from 5 to 3.5 with Derek Anderson coming in to make his 2nd start of the season. That’s not nearly enough of a line movement to compensate. Sure, Newton hasn’t been at his best this season, dealing with a variety of nagging injuries, but he’s still lead this offense to a solid 73.44% rate in 12 starts this season, despite having limited talent around him on the offensive line, in the receiving corps, and at the running back position. The defense, which allows opponents to move the chains at a 74.82% rate, is a much bigger part of the reason why this team is 4-8-1.

Sure, Anderson beat these Buccaneers in Tampa Bay earlier this season, but that’s not much of an accomplishment, as the Buccaneers are 14-31-1 ATS at home since 2009 (14-32 straight up), as opposed to 26-20-1 ATS (16-31 straight up) on the road. This season has essentially followed that same pattern as they are winless at home in 6 games (1-5 ATS), but 4-3 ATS (2-5 straight up) on the road. Just because Anderson won a close game in Tampa Bay earlier this season doesn’t mean he’ll necessarily win again here in Carolina, especially with Greg Hardy no longer on the field. And even if he does win, this line gives us some breathing room with the Buccaneers.

That win earlier this season by the Panthers actually puts them in a bad spot this week. Divisional home favorites are 25-49 ATS since 2002 against a divisional opponent that they previously beat as road underdogs during that same regular season. It’s a weird trend and it’s a little complicated, but it makes sense when you think about it. In divisional matchups where the homefield advantage decides who is the favorite, generally those two teams are essentially even. Divisional opponents that are essentially even generally split the season series. That seems to happen even if the road team pulls the upset in the first matchup, as the road underdog wins about half the time (39-38) in the rematch and covers at that aforementioned 2/3rds rate. The Anderson lead Panthers and the Buccaneers are essentially even and there’s a good chance the Buccaneers get their revenge this week.

The Panthers were already in a bad spot coming off of a huge upset win in New Orleans last week as teams are 48-70 ATS since 1989 off of an upset win as 10+ point underdogs, including 25-40 ATS off a divisional upset win as 10+ point underdogs. Meanwhile, the Buccaneers are in a good spot in their 2nd straight road game. Teams are 111-76 ATS as road underdogs off a road loss since 2008, including 94-54 ATS when it’s their 2nd straight (and not 3rd straight) road game and they next play a home game. Historically, teams cover at about a 65% rate in that situation. This is because teams tend to do better in their 2nd straight road game than their first one, but lines don’t really adjust for this. Teams are 182-195 in their 2nd of two road games since 2008, getting outscored by an average of 0.32 points per game, as opposed to 269-385 in their 1st of one road game since 2008, getting outscored by an average of 3.28 points per game.

The only reason this isn’t a bigger play is because the Buccaneers have a very tough game against the Packers in Tampa Bay on deck next week.  Teams are 60-94 ATS since 2012 before being 3+ point home underdogs, including 31-65 ATS before being 4+ point home underdogs, 9-24 ATS before being 7+ point home underdogs, and 1-7 ATS before being 10+ point home underdogs (the early line in Green Bay -10.5). That’s because when you have a game coming up like that it generally means one of two things. One, you have a very tough, important game coming up. Two, you really aren’t that good of a football team. Here, I think it’s both. However, the Panthers aren’t very good either and there’s enough stuff here to be confident in the Buccaneers as long as the line is a field goal or more.

Tampa Bay Buccaneers 17 Carolina Panthers 16 Upset Pick +145

Pick against the spread: Tampa Bay +3.5

Confidence: Medium

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

St. Louis Rams at Arizona Cardinals: 2014 Week 15 NFL Pick

Arizona Cardinals (10-3) at St. Louis Rams (6-7)

At first glance, this line seems off. The Cardinals aren’t as good as their 10-3 record, but rate of moving the chains differential still says we’re getting a significant amount of line value with them as 4.5 point underdogs. The Cardinals rank 10th, moving the chains at a 71.50% rate, as opposed to 69.85% for their opponents, a differential of 1.66%. The Rams, meanwhile, move the chains at a 70.48% rate, as opposed to 71.28% for their opponents, a differential of -0.80%. This line was 2.5 a week ago and it’s since moved across key numbers of 3 and 4 and I love fading significant line movements like that.

However, I understand why this line is where it is. The Rams are playing dominate football over the past two weeks, allowing opponents to move the chains at a mere 54.55% rate, as opposed to 75.86% for their offense. It’s also hard to ignore the fact that they haven’t allowed a single point in either of their last 2 games, becoming the just the 4th team in the last 25 years to pull off that feat. For the record, each of the previous 3 teams covered by an average of 10.67 points the following week, though that’s such a small sample size.

You can call the past two weeks a fluke and it’s important to remember that in the first 11 games of the season they moved the chains at a 69.50% rate, as opposed to 74.03% for their opponents, a differential of -4.53%. However, keep in mind that over those 11 games, they played 9 teams that currently have winning records and managed to pull the upset 3 times against the likes of Denver, Seattle, and San Francisco. You can say that over the past two weeks they were only playing the Redskins and the Raiders, but it’s not like the Cardinals’ offense is moving the ball well right now. In games that Drew Stanton has started, they are moving the chains at a mere 68.98% rate and they have just 2 offensive touchdowns in their last 3 games and one of those was a garbage time touchdown against a terrible Atlanta defense. That doesn’t exactly seem like a recipe for success going on the road against a red hot defense. The Cardinals’ defense isn’t healthy either with Tyrann Mathieu out and Antonio Cromartie likely out.

The Cardinals haven’t exactly been great on the road this year anyway, moving the chains at a 69.41% rate, as opposed to 71.27% for their opponents on the road this season. On the road with Drew Stanton, they move the chains at a 57.53% rate. The Rams were within 3 of the Cardinals in Arizona earlier this season before the Cardinals had 3 fluky touchdowns, one on a long pass, and two on return touchdowns. And that was when the Cardinals still had Carson Palmer. The Rams are also in a good spot as divisional home favorites before being non-divisional home favorites as teams are 51-33 ATS in that spot since 2008. They have no distractions on the horizon with the lowly Giants coming to town next week. I would have liked the Rams a lot more at 2.5, but they should still be the right side here at 4.5, even if it’s for a no confidence pick.

St. Louis Rams 17 Arizona Cardinals 10

Pick against spread: St. Louis -4.5

Confidence: None

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Washington Redskins at New York Giants: 2014 Week 15 NFL Pick

Washington Redskins (3-10) at New York Giants (4-9)

One of the most powerful trends says that teams that finish 6-10 or worse cover the spread as 6+ point favorites about a quarter of the time historically, which makes a lot of sense. The problem with this trend is it’s often very hard to know whether or not a team favored by 6 or more is actually going to finish 6-10 or worse. Here, it’s pretty clear. The Giants sit at 4-9 and would need to win their final 3 games to finish better than 6-10, which seems unlikely as they’d need to pull upsets against the Rams and Eagles in week 16 and week 17 respectively. Despite that, they are favored by a touchdown here.

This line is way too high. Even if I didn’t know about that trend, I’d think this line was off. The Giants rank 18th in rate of moving the chains differential, moving the chains at a 72.56% rate, as opposed to 72.82% for their opponents, a differential of -0.26%. Meanwhile, the Redskins rank 25th, moving the chains at a 70.40% rate, as opposed to 72.44% for their opponents, a differential of -2.04%. On top of that, the Giants haven’t really had much of a homefield advantage over the past decade or so. Since 2004, the Giants are 52-42 on the road, getting outscored by an average of 0.20 points per game, as opposed to 50-40 at home, outscoring opponents by an average of 2.64 points per game. The Giants seem to only be marginally better at home (about 3 points), but the line has never really adapted to compensate.

This isn’t unique to the Giants, as the whole NFC East recently has had less homefield advantage than average recently. At home, the NFC East is 73-85 since 2010, outscoring opponents by an average of0.67 points per game and going 59-96 ATS. On the road, they are 77-80, getting outscored by an average of 2.00 points per game and going 83-72 ATS. As you can imagine, road teams in NFC East divisional games tend to do well, going 25-14 ATS over that time period as divisional road underdogs. We’re getting a significant amount of line value with the Redskins.

Going off of that, the Giants won as 3.5 point underdogs in Washington earlier this season. That puts them in a bad spot this week, as divisional home favorites are 25-49 ATS since 2002 against a divisional opponent that they previously beat as road underdogs during that same regular season. It’s a weird trend and it’s a little complicated, but it makes sense when you think about it. In divisional matchups where the homefield advantage decides who is the favorite, generally those two teams are essentially even. Divisional opponents that are essentially even generally split the season series. That seems to happen even if the road team pulls the upset in the first matchup, as the road underdog wins about half the time (39-38) in the rematch and covers at that aforementioned 2/3rds rate.

The Redskins have had a rough 2 week stretch, losing by a combined score of 73-27, including a 24-0 home loss last week. Teams generally do well off of rough stretches like that. Teams are 41-23 ATS since 2002 off of back-to-back losses by 21 or more and 40-25 ATS since 1989 off of a home game in which they didn’t score any points. It might seem counterintuitive, but it makes sense when you think about it as teams are often overlooked, undervalued, and embarrassed in that spot. I can’t say for sure that they’ll be overlooked or embarrassed, but they probably will be and they’re definitely undervalued, I talked about this earlier.

On top of what I’ve said already, this line was 3.5 a week ago so it moved 3.5 points, which is a huge overreaction. I love fading huge line movements whenever it makes sense and it definitely does here. In spite of that, the public is all over the Giants and I love fading the public whenever it makes sense as they always lose money in the long run, as it makes sense here. The only thing working against the Redskins is the fact that they have another tough game coming up with a home game against the Eagles on deck. Teams are 60-94 ATS since 2012 before being 3+ point home underdogs, including 31-65 ATS before being 4+ point home underdogs. However, the Giants have a tough game in St. Louis on deck as well and there’s just too much stuff in Washington’s favor this week to ignore. They’re my Pick of the Week.

Washington Redskins 20 New York Giants 17 Upset Pick +245

Pick against the spread: Washington +7

Confidence: Pick of the Week

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

2014 Week 14 NFL Pick Results

Last week

Against the Spread: 5-10-1

Straight Up: 9-7

Pick of the Week: 0-0-1

High Confidence: 0-2

Medium Confidence: 1-3

Low Confidence: 3-2

No Confidence: 1-3

Upset Picks: 1-3

On the season

Against the Spread: 117-89-2 (.568)

Straight Up: 135-72-1 (.652)

Pick of the Week: 8-5-1

High Confidence: 8-10

Medium Confidence: 42-23

Low Confidence: 29-24-1

No Confidence: 30-27

Upset Picks: 16-18

Rate of Moving the Chains – Week 15

What is this? This is rate of moving the chains, which is my primary statistic for handicapping games. It holds the assumption that the goal of any team on any given 1st and 10 (or 1st and goal) is to move the chains (or score). In order to figure out how often teams meet that goal, I take first downs plus touchdowns and divide it by first downs plus touchdowns plus failures to move the chains (successes divided by attempts). Failures to move the chains include punts, turnovers, failed 4th downs, and field goal attempts (being forced to kick a field goal is a failure). I have this sorted by percent for (to evaluate offenses), percent against (to evaluate defenses), and differentials (to evaluate teams).

Offense

First Downs Touchdowns Field Goals Punts Turnovers Failed 4ths Safeties
1 GB 288 46 26 39 8 4 2 80.87%
2 NO 329 40 20 46 22 6 0 79.70%
3 BAL 291 38 28 42 16 6 0 78.15%
4 PIT 320 37 26 53 16 6 0 77.95%
5 DEN 295 47 19 57 16 6 0 77.73%
6 NE 305 41 31 54 11 4 0 77.58%
7 IND 318 45 27 52 26 7 1 76.26%
8 DAL 271 38 24 47 22 3 1 76.11%
9 CHI 277 34 12 55 25 10 0 75.30%
10 SEA 271 32 31 50 11 7 1 75.19%
11 KC 256 32 18 58 15 6 0 74.81%
12 MIA 279 30 31 47 18 9 0 74.64%
13 ATL 276 35 26 54 19 6 1 74.58%
14 SD 258 31 21 62 15 4 0 73.91%
15 CAR 275 28 26 62 20 3 0 73.19%
16 NYG 278 34 17 65 26 10 0 72.56%
17 HOU 257 30 28 62 17 4 1 71.93%
18 ARZ 246 25 26 70 11 1 0 71.50%
19 PHI 284 34 29 64 30 4 0 71.46%
20 DET 254 27 32 57 16 8 0 71.32%
21 CIN 250 31 25 63 20 5 0 71.32%
22 SF 250 23 28 60 20 5 0 70.73%
23 STL 237 28 24 64 19 4 0 70.48%
24 WAS 256 27 22 64 24 9 0 70.40%
25 CLE 265 27 28 74 18 9 0 69.36%
26 MIN 232 22 28 67 16 4 1 68.65%
27 NYJ 238 20 29 65 22 6 0 67.89%
28 TB 224 24 20 61 28 8 1 67.76%
29 TEN 213 24 16 70 24 7 2 66.57%
30 BUF 229 25 32 67 19 8 2 66.49%
31 JAX 228 20 20 75 25 9 0 65.78%
32 OAK 203 22 15 83 26 4 0 63.74%

 

Defense

First Downs Touchdowns Field Goals Punts Turnovers Failed 4ths Safeties
1 BUF 249 23 26 70 28 4 0 68.00%
2 CLE 275 28 28 72 26 7 1 69.34%
3 ARZ 247 24 25 62 23 7 0 69.85%
4 DET 248 24 19 71 20 5 1 70.10%
5 PHI 269 34 20 76 24 9 0 70.14%
6 SEA 231 24 20 63 20 3 1 70.44%
7 SF 236 28 17 62 22 7 0 70.97%
8 KC 253 22 32 60 10 10 0 71.06%
9 IND 261 34 16 73 20 10 0 71.26%
10 STL 253 25 19 61 24 8 0 71.28%
11 DEN 261 32 22 70 19 6 1 71.29%
12 MIA 248 28 26 50 22 8 1 72.06%
13 NE 274 26 29 52 21 13 0 72.29%
14 WAS 240 36 19 68 15 3 0 72.44%
15 HOU 281 29 19 61 29 8 0 72.60%
16 NYJ 241 36 26 65 10 2 1 72.70%
17 NYG 259 33 25 57 22 5 0 72.82%
18 JAX 270 34 28 61 17 5 1 73.08%
19 OAK 264 36 30 64 10 5 0 73.35%
20 MIN 262 30 23 62 17 4 0 73.37%
21 PIT 253 35 24 61 16 2 1 73.47%
22 SD 253 30 23 56 15 7 1 73.51%
23 BAL 264 28 24 55 18 7 1 73.55%
24 CIN 293 29 29 58 17 8 2 73.85%
25 TB 282 37 31 56 20 3 0 74.36%
26 CAR 270 36 24 56 19 4 0 74.82%
27 DAL 259 34 15 55 21 7 0 74.94%
28 CHI 263 39 32 40 19 6 0 75.69%
29 ATL 297 35 34 46 24 2 0 75.80%
30 TEN 307 37 34 54 16 4 0 76.11%
31 GB 297 34 19 44 24 11 0 77.16%
32 NO 293 37 27 48 13 2 1 78.38%

 

Differential

1 DEN 6.44%
2 NE 5.29%
3 IND 5.00%
4 SEA 4.74%
5 BAL 4.60%
6 PIT 4.48%
7 KC 3.75%
8 GB 3.72%
9 MIA 2.58%
10 ARZ 1.66%
11 PHI 1.32%
12 NO 1.31%
13 DET 1.22%
14 DAL 1.17%
15 SD 0.41%
16 CLE 0.02%
17 SF -0.24%
18 NYG -0.26%
19 CHI -0.39%
20 HOU -0.67%
21 STL -0.80%
22 ATL -1.22%
23 BUF -1.51%
24 CAR -1.63%
25 WAS -2.04%
26 CIN -2.53%
27 MIN -4.72%
28 NYJ -4.81%
29 TB -6.60%
30 JAX -7.29%
31 TEN -9.53%
32 OAK -9.61%