Houston Texans at San Francisco 49ers: 2013 Week 5 NFL Pick

Houston Texans (2-2) at San Francisco 49ers (2-2)

The Texans aren’t as bad as they’ve looked in the past two weeks. They led a very good Seattle team 20-6 at home before failing to close it out (so much for their 7-0 record in games decided by a touchdown or less meaning they “know how to win”) and against Baltimore, they were pretty even in first downs, yards, and punts. Baltimore just won by 21 because of two return touchdowns. However, they weren’t nearly as good as they looked coming into the last 2 weeks. They’ve now been outscored by 13 points over their last 17 games. This is the definition of a pedestrian team.

The 49ers, meanwhile, started out slow, but that was probably a fluke. There is no shame in getting blown out in Seattle and the Indianapolis game could have easily been a fluke. They looked as good as I knew they were against the Rams and they should continue playing that well going forward. Things will only get better as they are expected to get Patrick Willis back from injury this week. They certainly have the talent to blow out Houston here.

San Francisco 49ers 24 Houston Texans 13

Pick against spread: San Francisco -6.5

Confidence: Low

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

San Francisco 49ers: 2013 Week 5 NFL Power Rankings (#5)

Last week: 5

Record: 2-2

They still have issues, which I why I’m not moving them back up, but the 49ers looked as good as I knew they were against the Rams, blowing them out 35-11 in St. Louis. Now they have 10 days before a big Sunday Night Football matchup with the Texans. They should continue to play well and prove their rough start was a fluke, especially with Patrick Willis expected to return.

Week 4 Studs

FB Bruce Miller

LT Joe Staley

LG Mike Iupati

DT Glenn Dorsey

MLB NaVorro Bowman

CB Tarell Brown

Week 4 Duds

QB Colin Kaepernick

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

San Francisco 49ers at St. Louis Rams: 2013 Week 4 NFL Pick

San Francisco 49ers (1-2) at St. Louis Rams (1-2)

I legitimately don’t understand this line. Yes, the 49ers haven’t looked good in the past two weeks, but neither have the Rams. Week 2, the Rams were down 21-0 in Atlanta before a combination of garbage time and Falcon injuries allowed them to get it within 7 by the time the game ended. Last week, they got blown out 31-7 in Dallas and it wasn’t even that close. The Rams managed a grand total of one first down in the first half before garbage time. They’ve been outscored by 41-3 in the first half over the past two weeks.

The difference between these two teams is that I expect the 49ers to bounce back. Last week’s loss was embarrassing, at home against the Colts, a team who has no recent history of beating good teams, blowing teams out, or having success on the road. However, it’s very possible that was just an aberration. The 49ers’ loss in Seattle the week before was more legitimate, but there is no shame in losing, even losing big, in Seattle, where it’s near impossible to win.

The 49ers return Vernon Davis from injury, which is going to help their offense tremendously because it gives Kaepernick someone other than Anquan Boldin to throw to. It’s much easier to take away one receiver than it is to take away two. Aldon Smith is out for the 49ers, as he gets treatment for a drinking problem, but the 49ers have enough talent to make up for his absence. They had a league leading 11 of my top-200 players last month, while they were simultaneously seen as a unanimous top-3 NFL team. People have completely overreacted to their 1-2 start.

Aldon Smith’s absence could actually be good thing in the sense that he’s no longer a distraction. It’s very possible that had something to do with their dud performance at home last week. Patrick Willis’ absence will be much bigger as he misses this week with a groin problem, but they do have enough other talent to make up for it. There’s still no reason why they should be mere 3.5 point favorites here in St. Louis.

Trends wise, this is actually a good spot for the 49ers. Teams are 67-39 ATS since 2008 off of back-to-back losses by 20+ points. Teams tend to be overlooked, undervalued, and embarrassed in that situation and I think that’s definitely true here. On top of that, the 49ers were incredible in the Jim Harbaugh era off of a loss until last week. The 49ers were 5-2 ATS off a loss in that time span, 7-2 ATS if you include week 1 games (games after a season ending playoff loss).

If you look closer, that was even more impressive as those two non-covers included a 14 point win as 16.5 point favorites and a 7 point win as 7.5 point favorites, a game they would have covered against the Seahawks if Jim Harbaugh hadn’t declined a safety, in favor of just running the clock out. They had won those 7 games by an average margin of about 17 points per game, 23-6. Last week was obviously the exception, but I think that is still worth mentioning here. I’d be shocked if Jim Harbaugh’s team had a 3rd straight dud performance.

On top of that, favorites are 37-22 ATS in a divisional matchup against teams they have not beaten in their previous 2 matchups. This makes sense. I ordinarily don’t subscribe to the “revenge game” theory, that teams will be more motivated to beat a team that previously beat them. However, the Rams’ tie and win over the 49ers last year could be having some sort of effect on this line, which is why it’s so low. It’s like that people believe those two performances were not a fluke and that the Rams somehow “have the 49ers” number, whatever that means. I don’t buy that and I’ll just enjoy the low line. It also means the 49ers are highly unlikely to overlook the Rams, especially off of two straight losses. The better team will dominate. Willis’ absence is the only reason this isn’t my Pick of the Week.

I’m also taking the under. The under tends to cover on Thursday Night. I haven’t taken the under yet on a Thursday Night, but there’s always been a reason. First, Broncos/Ravens wasn’t a true Thursday Night game because the two teams had all off-season to prepare. Second, Patriots’ games usually hit the over. Third, I didn’t trust the Eagles’ defense at all last week. However, the under actually did hit both week 2 and week 3 and there’s no reason not to take it this week, especially since it’s a divisional game. The under is 39-21 since 1989 in divisional Thursday Night games. These teams are going to have a hard time going over 42.5.

San Francisco 49ers 23 St. Louis Rams 9

Pick against spread: San Francisco -3.5

Confidence: High

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

San Francisco 49ers: 2013 Week 4 NFL Power Rankings (#5)

Last week: 2 (-3)

The 49ers get a pass from me for losing in Seattle because the Seahawks are near impossible to beat at home and they get a pass for last week because they were without Vernon Davis and they were very possibly distracted by the Aldon Smith situation. The whole team played like they showed up to the practice facility at 7 AM drunk. Jokes ahead, I have no idea why the 49ers allowed him to play last week. Arrest aside and prescription drugs aisde, this is a guy who thought it was appropriate to show up to practice drunk. That’s a sign of a guy who feels he’s above the team because of his star status and allowed him to play just reinforces that. Smith is on leave indefinitely seeking treatment and won’t play against the Rams this week, but they do get Vernon Davis back and they have enough other talent, so I expect them to bounce back. If they lose this week, then they’ll be out of passes.

Week 3 Studs

FB Bruce Miller

Week 3 Duds

QB Colin Kaepernick

CB Tarell Brown

LE Tony Jerod-Eddie

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Indianapolis Colts at San Francisco 49ers: 2013 Week 3 NFL Pick

Indianapolis Colts (1-1) at San Francisco 49ers (1-1)

The 49ers lost in Seattle last week 29-3, but there’s no shame at all losing to the Seahawks in Seattle. Dating back to the start of last season, the Seahawks have won all 9 home games by an average score of 30-11. They should be able to bounce back this week, as they have every time after a loss since Jim Harbaugh took over before the 2011 season. The 49ers are 5-2 ATS off a loss in that time span, 7-2 ATS if you include week 1 games (games after a season ending playoff loss).

If you look closer, that’s even more impressive as those two non-covers included a 14 point win as 16.5 point favorites and a 7 point win as 7.5 point favorites, a game they would have covered against the Seahawks if Jim Harbaugh hadn’t declined a safety, in favor of just running the clock out. They’ve won those 7 games by an average margin of about 17 points per game, 23-6. They should be as motivated as they can be this week coming off of a loss and they might also be a little overlooked and undervalued after what happened this week.

The Colts, meanwhile, have had a lot of trouble against playoff caliber opponents over the past 2 seasons. Last year, they played 7 games against teams who finished .500 or better. They went 3-4 in those games, which isn’t awful, but those wins came by 3, 3, and 12, while the losses came by 20, 35, 12, and 15. They went as good as their 11-5 record would have suggested last season, because of all of those blowout losses (plus a 35-9 loss to the freaking Jets!) and because they had 7 wins by 7 points or less against teams that won 7 or fewer games. They were especially bad on the road last season, going 4-5 on the road with a point differential of -76 and an opponent’s overall record of 64-80.

They haven’t really looked any better this season, barely beating the Raiders at home and then losing to the Dolphins at home, a game in which they lost one of their only good offensive linemen, Donald Thomas, for the season. They will get Trent Richardson in this week through trade, but he’s unlikely to have much of an impact less than a week after joining this team. He might not even play on passing downs as he learns the blocking schemes, especially with Ahmad Bradshaw, one of the league’s premier passing down backs, behind him on the depth chart. Richardson will have an impact going forward, but the Colts should still get blown out this week by the 49ers.

San Francisco 49ers 27 Indianapolis Colts 9

Pick against spread: San Francisco -9.5

Confidence: Medium

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

San Francisco 49ers: 2013 Week 3 NFL Power Rankings (#2)

Last week: 2

No shame in losing to the Seahawks in Seattle. No one won there last season and I don’t think anyone is winning there this season, including playoffs. Frank Gore’s slow start has to be concerning, however. He’s rushed for just 60 yards on 30 carries thus far this season. Ordinarily, it’s important not to overreact to 2 games, but Gore is a 30-year-old running back with 2259 career touches so you have to worry that he could just be done. Neither Kendall Hunter nor LaMichael James is capable of handling much of a bigger load, while Marcus Lattimore, the likely lead back of the future, is not expected to play this season as he recovers from injury.

Week 2 Studs

ROLB Aldon Smith

Week 2 Duds

QB Colin Kaepernick

FB Bruce Miller

WR Anquan Boldin

LT Joe Staley

LG Mike Iupati

RT Anthony Davis

CB Nnamdi Asomugha

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

San Francisco 49ers at Seattle Seahawks: 2013 Week 2 NFL Pick

San Francisco 49ers (1-0) at Seattle Seahawks (1-0)

I feel like I talk about the Seahawks’ home/road disparity every week. Going back to 2007, they are 16-37 on the road, getting outscored by 6.42 points per game, and 32-18 at home, outscoring opponents by 6.32 points per game. They are 34-15 ATS at home in that span. Last week, they had a very impressive win in Carolina. It might not seem like a 5 point win over the Panthers is that impressive, but if the Panthers are as good as I think they are, it is, especially in Carolina at 1 PM ET.

It’s very possible they’ve carried over their strong finish to last season, in which they were better both home and away, finishing 7-1 in the regular season, including road wins in Chicago and a road blowout win in Buffalo. If that’s true, they’re going to be near impossible to beat at home, even for San Francisco. Last year at home, they outscored opponents by 18.5 points per game (30.4-11.9), beating 4 eventual playoff teams. During their 7-1 stretch last season, they had wins of 28-7, 58-0, 50-17, and 42-13 at home, the latter of which was actually against San Francisco.

The big reason for their improvement in their past 11 games, including last year’s playoffs, has been the play of Russell Wilson, who shook off a slow start to his rookie season and now is one of the best quarterbacks in the NFL. In his last 11 games, including playoffs, he’s completed 187 of 278 (67.3%) for 2544 yards (9.2 YPA), 20 touchdowns, and 3 interceptions.

Because of the Seahawks’ home dominance, this line should be at least -6, which would suggest that these two teams are even (which is being conservative if Seattle is really as good as they’ve looked in their last 11 games), but that Seattle has an absurd home field advantage that’s worth at least 6 points, which historical and recent data suggests is the case. Instead, the line is at -2.5. I’m not betting against Seattle at home, especially during a week in which they are going to attempt to set the World Record for loudest stadium. This is actually my Pick of the Week.

Seattle Seahawks 27 San Francisco 49ers 13

Pick against spread: Seattle -2.5

Confidence: Pick of the Week

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

San Francisco 49ers: 2013 Week 2 NFL Power Rankings (#2)

The only reason the 49ers aren’t #1 is because they lost the Super Bowl last season. no team has lost the Super Bowl and come back to win it the following season in over 40 years. No reigning Super Bowl loser has even made the Super Bowl the following season since the early 90s Bills. It’s why I didn’t pick the Patriots last season. It’s very physically and mentally tough to come back from that. Their victory over the Packers was impressive though.

Week 1 Studs

WR Anquan Boldin

Week 1 Duds

LOLB Ahmad Brooks

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

Green Bay Packers at San Francisco 49ers: 2013 Week 1 NFL Pick

Green Bay Packers (0-0) at San Francisco 49ers (0-0)

The 49ers beat the Packers in Green Bay last season as underdogs in what was a statement game for a team that would go on to prove that their 2011 season was no fluke. This season, the situation is completely flipped. The 49ers are the ones favored by more than 4 points at home, while the Packers are the ones who need a statement win. They lost both games to the 49ers last year, including an embarrassing loss to the 49ers on this same field to end their season in the post-season. Defensive Coordinator Dom Capers was caught embarrassingly unprepared, not expecting the 49ers to run nearly as much pistol and read option after they went away from that late in the season to catch any potential playoff opponents off guard.

The 49ers won’t catch the Packers off guard this time. I just feel like the Packers have been stewing on that loss all off-season and will be as prepared as they can be for the 49ers’ offense. The 49ers will still put up points. They have talent. They’re not just a gimmick team. However, I do think the Packers will turn the tables on the 49ers, much like the 49ers did last season. In recent years, we’ve seen the Ravens and Cowboys come out of the gates and beat a team that was previously unbeatable for them and that had previously ended their season in the Steelers and Giants respectively.

This game actually has some parallels to that Ravens/Steelers game, as the 49ers will be coming off a Super Bowl loss. Teams coming off a Super Bowl loss have not done well week 1 in recent years, going 4-15 ATS in their last 19 instances. I’m not saying this game isn’t going to be important for the 49ers too, but I think the Packers have the situational edge here, especially with the 49ers having a visit to Seattle the following week, which could be their biggest game of the season the way Seattle blew them out in the 49ers’ last visit.

I also like getting more than 3 points with Aaron Rodgers, who is 6-1 ATS as an underdog of more than a field goal in his career. The Packers have lost just 6 games, including playoffs, by more than 4 points dating back to the middle of the 2009 season, a 64 game stretch. One of those losses was in overtime. If the Packers lose here, I have confidence that it’ll be a field goal game. I originally had this as a higher confidence game but the Packers will be without key nickel back Casey Hayward with injuries, while middle linebacker Brad Jones and safety Morgan Burnett will be game time decisions (though they sound like they’re expected to play).

Also, one note, I’m changing how I do picks this year. I’ll be grouping my picks into high confidence, medium confidence, low confidence, and no confidence picks. I’ll also have one pick of the week.

Green Bay Packers 27 San Francisco 49ers 24 Upset Pick +185

Pick against spread: Green Bay +4.5

Confidence: Medium

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

San Francisco 49ers trade WR AJ Jenkins to the Kansas City Chiefs for WR Jonathan Baldwin

This is a very interesting deal for the 49ers. The Chiefs dealing Baldwin isn’t unprecedented. He’s largely been a bust through the first two years of his career and the Head Coach/GM combo of Todd Haley and Scott Pioli that drafted him is gone. Andy Reid and John Dorsey aren’t admitting a mistake getting rid of him. They’re just trying to get the best 53 possible.

The 49ers, however, are admitting a mistake getting rid of Jenkins and in pretty unprecedented fashion. I can’t remember another time a team drafted a player in the first round and then admitted their mistake with him after just one season. Trent Baalke and Jim Harbaugh haven’t made a lot of mistakes. This was one of them, a pretty bad one, drafting Jenkins ahead of where the rest of the league valued him, and they’re showing with this move they have no problem admitting a mistake. Like the Chiefs, they’re just trying to get the best 53 possible. Time will tell if it’s the correct move, but it’s definitely very interesting.

I do think the 49ers are getting the better end of the deal here, at least on paper. At least when Baldwin was drafted in the first round, it wasn’t a huge shock. The 49ers were one of the few teams in the league that rated Jenkins as high as a 1st rounder, but Baldwin had legitimate first round talent coming out of Pittsburgh in 2011. He’s struggled with the mental parts of the game and had run ins with coaches and teammate and remains a very stiff route runner, but he has the most upside of the two receivers in this deal.

He’s also had the better career to this point. Jenkins has played 47 career snaps and hasn’t caught a pass, dropping his only attempt and he hasn’t looked much better in practice or the pre-season. Baldwin has caught 41 passes for 579 yards and 2 touchdowns in his career, despite dealing with poor quarterback play. It’s not anything to be impressed about at all, and he’s been incredibly inefficient, catching those passes on 97 targets (42.2%) and 565 routes run (1.02 yards per route run), but at least he’s shown something.

I know Baldwin has a year more experience than Jenkins, but they’re actually pretty much the same age, being born about a month apart. For the Chiefs, Jenkins is a better fit for their West Coast offense, but they’re getting the inferior talent. It’s not a huge trade (except for that it’s really interesting), as neither of these guys are guaranteed a roster spot in their new home, but the 49ers came out of the trade with the better player.

Grade for 49ers: A

Grade for Chiefs: C

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]