Running Backs 2012

 

Updated 4/4/12

QB RB FB WR TE OT G C DE RLB DT NT 3-4 DE OLB MLB CB S K P

Scoring System

100 Once in a decade prospect 
95-99 Elite talent 
90-95 Solid top 10 pick 
85-90 Solid first round pick 
80-85 Late 1st-early 2nd 
75-80 Solid 2nd round pick 
70-75 Solid 3rd round pick 
65-70 3rd-4th round pick 
60-65 4th-5th round pick 
55-60 5th round pick 
50-55 6th round pick 
45-50 7th round pick 
40-45 Undrafted, invite to training camp 
<40 No NFL Future 

 

1. Trent Richardson (Alabama) 92

2. Doug Martin (Boise State) 81

3. Chris Polk (Washington) 76

4. David Wilson (Virginia Tech) 75

5. Lamar Miller (Miami) 74

6. Robert Turbin (Utah State) 68

7. Bernard Pierce (Temple) 66

8. Vick Ballard (Mississippi State) 65

9. Terrance Ganaway (Baylor) 63

10. LaMichael James (Oregon) 62

11. Cyrus Gray (Texas A&M) 62

12. Isaiah Pead (Cincinnati) 60

13. Ronnie Hillman (San Diego State) 57

14. Chris Rainey (Florida) 54

14. Dan Herron (Ohio State) 52

15. Antwon Bailey (Syracuse) 51

16. Bobby Rainey (Western Kentucky) 49

17. Brandon Bolden (Mississippi State) 47

18. Tauren Poole (Tennessee) 45

 

Running Backs 2011

 

Updated 4/20/11 

QB RB FB WR TE OT G C DE RLB DT 3-4 DE NT MLB OLB CB S K P

Scoring System 

100 Once in a decade prospect 
95-99 Elite talent 
90-95 Solid top 10 pick 
85-90 Solid first round pick 
80-85 Late 1st-early 2nd 
75-80 Solid 2nd round pick 
70-75 Solid 3rd round pick 
65-70 3rd-4th round pick 
60-65 4th-5th round pick 
55-60 5th round pick 
50-55 6th round pick 
45-50 7th round pick 
40-45 Undrafted, invite to training camp 
30-40 Career practice squader 
20-30 No NFL future 
0-20 No football future 

 

1. Mark Ingram 85 (Alabama)

2. Mikel Leshoure 84 (Illinois)

3. Ryan Williams 81 (Virginia Tech)

4. Daniel Thomas 77 (Kansas State)

5. DeMarco Murray 75 (Oklahoma)

6. Jordan Todman 74 (Connecticut)

7. Shane Vereen 74 (California)

8. Jacquizz Rodgers 73 (Oregon State)

9. Derrick Locke 69 (Kentucky)

10. Kendall Hunter 68 (Oklahoma State)

11. Taiwan Jones 65 (Eastern Washington)

12. Dion Lewis 65 (Pittsburgh) 

13. Noel Devine 62 (West Virginia) 

14. Da’Rel Scott 60 (Maryland)

15. Delone Carter 59 (Syracuse)

16. Bilal Powell 59 (Louisville)

17. Anthony Allen 56 (Georgia Tech)

18. Roy Helu 54 (Nebraska)

19. Steven Ridley 53 (LSU)

20. Darren Evans 53 (Virginia Tech)

21. Alex Green 50 (Hawaii)

22. Evan Royster 47 (Penn State)

23. Allen Bradford 46 (USC)

24. Brandon Saine 45 (Ohio State)

25. Nic Grigsby 43 (Arizona)

26. Jay Finley 43 (Baylor)

27. Jamie Harper 42 (Clemson)

28. John Clay 42 (Wisconsin)

 

  

Running Backs

 

QB RB WR TE OT G C NT DT 3-4 DE DE RLB OLB MLB CB S K P

Updated: 4/17/10

Scoring System: 

100 Once in a decade prospect 

95-99 Elite talent 

90-95 Solid top 10 pick 

85-90 Solid first round pick 

80-85 Late 1st-early 2nd 

75-80 Solid 2nd round pick 

70-75 Solid 3rd round pick 

65-70 3rd-4th round pick 

60-65 4th-5th round pick 

55-60 5th round pick 

50-55 6th round pick 

45-50 7th round pick 

40-45 Undrafted, invite to training camp 

30-40 Career practice squader 

20-30 No NFL future 

0-20 No football future 

1. Jahvid Best (California) 87               

2/28/10: Jahvid Best just ran faster than CJ Spiller (4.35 compared to 4.37). Now what is Spiller better at? Best is the more complete back of the two, the only thing that Spiller could really say was that his speed was on another level. Now that doesn’t appear to be the case. Best is a better between the tackles runner, he’s more explosive. The only real thing Spiller does better is catch passes. I have compared Spiller to a gimmick weapon type guy like Reggie Bush all along and Best to a speed feature back like Jamaal Charles. In a few years, when Best is the better runner, you heard it here. Yet despite all this, Spiller is getting more hype because of his “unofficial” 4.27. It’s unofficial for a reason.

He could fall below CJ Spiller in the draft because of his concussion late in the season, but he’s a more complete player than Spiller. He’s got more explosive legs, he’s a better runner in between the tackles, and his 40 time is probably going to be faster. They are comparable players in terms of pure speed, but Spiller is more of a straight line runner while Best has better running back skills like initial explosion and good change of direction.

2. CJ Spiller (Clemson) 84

Has had trouble staying healthy in college and his career YPC does not suggest good running back skills, but he has a place in the NFL. He’s way too fast and agile to not have one. He can return kicks, return punts, and can serve as a 3rd down back or wildcat, but unlike Best I don’t think he’s a feature back at the next level.

3. Ryan Matthews (Fresno State) 81                     

2/28/10: Matthews would have moved up anyway given Jonathan Dwyer’s stink bomb because the two are compared often because both are considered future feature backs. However, that’s not the only reason he’s moving up. A 4.41 40 at 6-0 218 turned a lot of heads. He’s a good pass catcher and a great pass blocker for his age and he also runs extremely well. He could go 28th to San Diego because he has everything they look for in a back.

He’s a bit of a one hit wonder but with 1808 yards and 19 touchdowns on a 6.6 average, some teams are going to look past that like they did with former one hit wonders Donald Brown and Rashard Mendenhall, who both went in the first round. He runs a bit upright, but he has very refined pass blocking and pass catching abilities for his age and doesn’t fumble often. He has all the makings of a future feature back, though admittedly I’d like to see one more great season on his stat sheet just for him to prove that he can do it again and again, though you can’t really blame him because he was mostly a #2 back or goal line back throughout his first two years at Fresno State.

4. Toby Gerhart (Stanford) 77                                

2/28/10: Gerhart proved that just because he’s white, doesn’t mean he’s not athletic. Gerhart ran a very impressive 4.53 at 6-0 231 and also had a 38 inch vertical and 22 reps of 225 pounds. He likely shot himself ahead of a plummeting Jonathan Dwyer.

He’s a Heisman runner up, but, contrary to popular belief, that does not make him a future star at the next level. He is very slow and doesn’t change direction and he runs really upright and isn’t going to break nearly as many tackles next year against linebackers with refined tackling abilities. He does have good size though and runs with a lot of force and explosion so he should be a solid change of pace back, goal line back, or even fullback if his lead blocking improves, so he has a spot for him at the next level. It just won’t as a feature back or a star.

5. RB Jonathan Dwyer (Georgia Tech) 76              

2/28/10: Dwyer’s workout today proved what his weigh in showed and what people all around the NFL have been saying all week. He’s out of shape. At 5-11 229, Dwyer ran a 4.59, which isn’t awful, but when you consider his second time was 4.69, it looks a lot worse. He also only benched 15 reps, 3rd fewest of all RBs.

2/26/10: He just looked like a fat guy at his weigh in. He was 5-11 229 which sounds good, but he did not look in shape at all.  

Excellent size, but he put on a lot of weight from last season to this season and looked a lot more sluggish this year as a result, though his stats don’t suggest he struggled. He also played in a weird offense that just isn’t used in the NFL so you have to wonder how he would have fared statistically being overweight and in a normal offense. However, he’s got all the physical tools and is still projected to run a mid 4.4 40 at 235 pounds which is amazing so someone is going to snatch him early on upside alone.

6. RB Joe McKnight (USC) 75

The possible NCAA violations that came up late last season because of a possible incident in which he drove a car that belonged to his girlfriend and not him should not effect his draft stock because he’s simply never going to have anything close to that situation in the NFL. He’s a good kid and I don’t buy that he has character issues. I do buy that he’s not a starting running back at the next level. He’s fast but he’s not Chris Johnson fast and he doesn’t have elite explosion or change directions very well. He’s not elusive. However, he does have good speed and finally put together a good season in college this year after being a top recruit in 2007 and will be a welcome addition to many of the running back committees in the NFL today.

7. Anthony Dixon (Mississippi State) 74

Not the most mobile guy, but he’s agile for his large frame, 240 pounds, and is a very strong and physical runner and he gets his pads down low to the ground when he runs unlike Toby Gerhart and should be able to be a decent running back at the next level and break tackles. However, he’s slower than Gerhart and doesn’t have much upside at all. In fact, one can argue that he ran the ball too much in college, 910 attempts in 4 years, and that will shorten his NFL career. He also has a DUI to his name and that is a bit of a red flag. He’ll be drafted in the 3rd round range as a kind of, you know what your getting type guy. I don’t see him as a feature back at the next level.

 

8. Dexter McCluster (Mississippi) 73                  

2/28/10: Surprisingly, his 4.55 40 at 5-9 173 doesn’t hurt him that much in my book, but it has to hurt him some considering we were expecting a high 4.3, maybe low 4.4 at worse. However, this is one of those guys who is faster in pads than he is timed and stronger than his size. He should still catch on somewhere in the NFL as that Percy Harvin type player.

2/27/10: How do you bench 20 reps of 225 pounds when you are a mere 173 pounds? That is crazy! This little guy may be small, but he is tough, he is strong, he is committed, and he is damn fast as well. 

A blur of a football player who is a bit undersized. He has lined up at both running back and wide receiver in his career and had 1169 rushing yards and 520 receiving yards last season. He has also lined up as a wildcat so there’s going to be a spot in the NFL for him, though it is not going to be a conventional one. He will play the Percy Harvin role for a team, a slot receiver, return guy, and occasional 3rd down back and wildcat and will be plenty valuable doing so.

9. Montario Hardesty (Tennessee) 68                        

2/28/10: Hardesty is a favorite sleeper of mine. He could be that mid round running back who takes over a starting job in the NFL. He has good hands as a pass catcher and as a pass blocker and a good combination of size and speed. He has all the things you look for in a feature back. He just needs to put them together. On a day of slow 40s, a 4.49 at 6-0 225 is great. He also led all running backs in broad jump, 10 feet 4 inches, and vertical leap, 41 inches and had 21 reps of 225 pounds.

One of my favorite running back sleepers, a good size, speed combination, and very good hands, both in pass catching and pass blocking. He has everything he needs to be a factor right away and a 3rd down back at the very least. I see him having the upside as a future starting running back.

10. Ben Tate (Auburn) 63                   

2/28/10: Quietly had a very impressive day with a 4.45 40 at 5-11 220, along with a 40.5 inch vertical, a 10 foot 4 inch broad jump and a position leading 26 reps of 225 pounds. He’s always had the athleticism, but he’s been plagued by inconsistencies in the past so it’ll be interesting to see if he puts it together at the next level because if he does, he’s going to be a good player.

He has the athletic tools, size and speed, to be a good running back and finally had an impressive statistical season this year, but he has a history of inconsistency, even this year and scouts hate players who are inconsistent. He’ll probably get drafted with a mid round pick but I don’t see much of anything special in him. 

11. Jarrett Brown (West Virginia) 61                       

2/28/10: 40 times don’t matter a ton to quarterbacks, but a 4.54 will get you noticed, especially when you’re someone who may have to play another position at the NFL level. He’s a project, but he has upside at multiple positions including quarterback and running back. 

1/30/10: He didn’t have the best game overall, but he showed a lot of potential and physical tools. He’s an excellent athlete and has a running back’s frame, as shown in his weigh in, but he also showed a very good strong arm in the game. He really struggled with his touch and his footwork is very poor, he missed a wide open guy downfield because his feet weren’t set when he threw it, but overall, I like his upside a lot more now that I did before this week, when I saw him as a wildcat only.

1/26/10: Very athletic frame, measurables suggest a move to running back is possible. That’s good because he wasn’t going to make it as a quarterback in the NFL.

He’s certainly a project, but he has upside at two positions. He has the athleticism to play running back, but he also has a strong arm to play quarterback. His mechanics are an issue and he doesn’t have a lot of experience playing the quarterback position and even last year he struggled at times, but the upside is there.

12. James Starks (Buffalo) 61              

2/28/10: He lost his 2009 season due to a shoulder injury, but before that he had two straight season of 1000 yards, 3000 career yards, and 53 catches in 2008. He looked very healthy today running a very impressive 4.48 at 6-2 218. He’s a big back that runs well and can catch passes and reminds me a lot of a Tim Hightower type guy.

He has some questions to answer after his shoulder injury, but he was a very productive back before the injury, with good hands for his size. He reminds me of a Tim Hightower type 3rd down back.

13. LeGarrette Blount (Oregon) 60                     

1/30/10: He probably had the most to prove in Mobile this week, after the incident in which he punched an opposing player earlier this season, but he flashes a lot of what made him an NFL prospect in the first place. He ran with great pad level at 245 pounds and also made nice plays in the open field. He scored once on a very nice 14 yard run, on which he leaped through a defender from about the 4 yard line to get into the end zone, and he almost scored again on a play in which he dragged pretty much the entire South’s defense from about the 5 yard to almost the goal line, setting up a 1 yard quarterback sneak on the next play. The character concerns are clearly there, but he is a load to take down in the open field and he moves well and runs with great pad level for someone of his size. He is, at the very least, a goal line back at the next level if he can control himself on and off the field.

Blount is a big back who plays with a low pad level, but after punching an opposing player last season and getting suspended, he certainly has some questions to answer, but I think, at the very least, that he’ll be a solid goal line back, which teams always need.

14. Keith Toston (Oklahoma State) 59

3/15/10: Normally I don’t pay much attention to improved 40 times, but Totson also lost 8 pounds, from 213 to 205, and as a result of that ran a tenth of a second faster. I like the work ethic and discipline so I’ll move him back up a little. 

2/28/10: When he woke up this morning, running a 4.70 at 6-0 213 was probably not on his to do list. That’s pretty ugly.

Finally had a good year this year in his senior season after splitting carries throughout most of his career. He had 1218 yards and 11 touchdowns on a 5.4 average, though it was in Oklahoma State’s weird offense. His 40 time for his size is not expected to be great, but you can’t deny he has produced good numbers and he’s a very good pass catcher with 22 passes caught this season. He’ll fit into a running back rotation somewhere in the NFL, maybe as a pass catching back.

15. Deji Karim (Southern Illinois) 56

3/15/10: One thing I do like about Pro Days, watching guys I’ve never heard of. Southern Illinois’ Deji Karim had 1694 yards on a 7.4 YPC and 18 touchdowns last year, albeit for a small school, and then he came out and ran a 4.37 at 5-9 210 and then looked very good in his positional drills. He’s an interesting late round prospect with his combination of size, speed, and production. He also caught 17 passes last year, another plus.

Small school, but big upside because of the big power in his legs. Short and stocky at 5-9 210, but runs with a great low pad level, extremely powerful bulldozing over linebackers and has legit 4.4 speed. He was one of the best rushers in the country last year, albeit at a tiny school against weak competition, but we’ve seen many times in the past, backs from small school go on to do big things on the big stage. If you can run, you can run anywhere and this guy can run. I love his upside.

16. Andre Anderson (Tulane) 55

A decent runner, but not a great one with 1880 yards and 15 touchdowns on 412 carries over the last 2 years, and if he gets drafted in the first five rounders, it’ll be as a runner second and a pass catching back first. He has caught 55 balls over the last two years and reminds a lot of people of a poor man’s Matt Forte, who was drafted in the 2nd round out of Tulane two years ago.

17. Joique Bell (Wayne State) 54

He was the pride of Wayne State for the last 4 years, returning kicks, running the ball, catching passes, en route to having over 6000 career rushing yards. He broke the Wayne State rushing record midway through his junior year and then added an NCAA leading 2084 yards as a senior. However, he may have been overworked as a collegiate back and he lacks speed. His 40 times ranged from 4.65-4.68 and he really looked slow running the ball in the Senior Bowl. He lacks explosiveness and runs too upright to break the amount of tackles he broke in college. At an NFL level, his size, his best asset, will be nothing special, 5-11 219. 

18. John Conner (Kentucky) 49

19. LaMarcus Coker (Hampton) 47

20. Andre Dixon (Connecticut) 47 

21. Charles Scott (LSU) 46

22. Brandon James (Florida) 46

23. Toney Baker (NC State) 45

24. Rashawn Jackson (Virginia) 44

25. Manese Tonga (BYU) 41

26. Conte Cuttino (Stony Brook) 40

For my interview with Conte Cuttino, click here.

Roy Williams Bears

 

The financials of this deal have not been released, but it’s a two year deal and I’m expecting it to be a fairly cheap deal. If anyone can bring the former Pro-Bowler back out of Roy Williams, it’s Mike Martz, his coordinator in 2006 when he made the Pro Bowl. The Bears needed help at receiver, especially a bigger receiver like the 6-4 Williams. Unless I find out they overpaid, this is an A.

Grade: A

 

Ron Bartell Raiders

Bartell missed essentially the entire 2011 season with a broken neck, but he’s been medically cleared by both the Rams’ and the Raiders’ doctors. They Rams just cut him because of his salary and because they intended to go after Cortland Finnegan as their #1 cornerback. However, Bartell had a solid season in 2010 as St. Louis’ #1 cornerback, allowing a 52.1% completion percentage, 5.6 YPA, 2 touchdowns, no picks, and 7 penalties, ranking as ProFootballFocus’ #37 cornerback in the 2010 season. This was a nice, cheap signing for the Raiders (3 million over 1 year) and the Raiders desperately needed cornerback help as they were slated to start a 2011 3rd and 4th rounder at cornerback in 2012. They didn’t have a lot of cap space or draft picks so they almost had to make a move like this.

Grade: A 

 

Roman Harper Saints

Harper is getting paid 7.125 million dollars per year in this new deal. Harper is a beast in run support, but a liability somewhat in coverage. I don’t think he’s well rounder enough to earn that amount. The franchise tag value for safeties for 2010 (2011 numbers not yet released) was 6.455 million, calculated by taking the average of the top 5 safety salaries in the league for the 2009 season. Let’s say the franchise tag value for 2011 is around 7.125 million (that might even be on the high side). Is Harper one of the top 5 safeties in the league? My answer to that question is no. However, with this 4 year 28.5 million dollar deal with a whooping 16 million guaranteed, that’s what they’re paying him like.

Grade: D

 

Rolando McClain

 

Middle Linebacker 

Alabama

6-3 249

40 time: 4.69

Draft Board overall ranking: #7

Draft Board middle linebacker ranking: #1

Overall rating: 92*

1/23/10: 3-4 middle linebackers prospects rarely go top 10, but McClain might be an exception. At age 21, McClain is drawing some pretty warranted, though still premature, comparisons to Ray Lewis. In 3 years, McClain has 270 tackles, 5 picks, and 8 sacks. Beyond the numbers, I haven’t seen a linebacker as big as him move as well as he does. At 258 pounds, he was able to chase Tim Tebow down from behind and he could run a low 4.6 40. He’s a huge thumper and a great fundamental tackler. 270 tackles in 3 years doesn’t seem like much for a middle linebacker, but when you consider he’s a 3-4 middle linebacker and those 3 years were freshman-junior and not sophomore-senior, that’s impressive. Of all I have seen of him, he hasn’t done one thing one. He drops back into coverage with great skill already at his young age and he’s a former defensive end so he’ll be excellent on blitz packages in the NFL. Because he already has experience in a 3-4, there will be no major learning curve for him when a 3-4 team drafts him, but I do have some concerns about which positions he can play in a 4-3. I’m pretty sure he’ll fit as a 4-3 middle linebacker, but not sure about 4-3 strong outside linebacker.

                11/8/09: Rolando McClain has that elite size, speed combination for a middle linebacker (low 4.6 40 at 255+ pounds) and has experience playing in a 3-4 defense and is drawing comparisons to other extremely athletic 3-4 middle linebackers like Patrick Willis and even Ray Lewis. He doesn’t have Willis’ 4.4 speed, but he is bigger and stronger than Willis and the Lewis comparison isn’t far off in terms of a ceiling. He is one of the few players I’ve watched and not seen him do anything technically wrong. He fills holes very well as a 3-4 middle linebacker which is very crucial to plug up the gaps that nose tackles don’t get to. He has amazing size to compliment this strong initial burst which makes him a very tough run blocker. He actually has a chance to get more athletic as he won’t be 21 until next July, roughly 2 or 3 months after the NFL draft so he has a chance to grow even more which is scary. He is a former defensive end, which is not a surprise because of his size, so he understands how to blitz and has 5 sacks in the last two years solely on middle linebacker blitzes which are very rare. He is capable of dropping back in coverage and his size makes him a tough matchup for smaller tight ends and he has the speed to keep up with tight ends in the open field. He doesn’t have perfect coverage skills, but one would hardly expect him to because of his position and his youth. He has 5 interceptions in 3 years which shows that he can flash soft hands as well. He is a real student of the game, like Lewis is, but he doesn’t have Lewis’ fire and explosion. He’s not a mean passionate player like Lewis is. He’s not a hard hitter, but he does have good fundamentals on his tackles, but he’s not going to knock the ball lose with jaw dropping hits. He’s a tackling machine that can get to guys in the open  field and takes excellent routes to the ball. He had 91 tackles last season, which is a lot for a 3-4 middle linebacker. Brandon Spikes is the bigger name, but I would take McClain in a heartbeat over him if I were a 3-4 team and I would also draft McClain over Spikes if I were a 4-3 team because I believe he can be a big explosive middle linebacker in a 4-3 like Brian Urlacher if he has the right coaching.

NFL Comparison: Bart Scott

*=For a breakdown of what this means, click here

Rodney Hudson Scout

 

Guard

Florida State

6-2 299

Draft board overall prospect rank: #78

Draft board overall guard rank: #7

Overall rating: 72 (3rd round)

40 time: 5.22

4/20/11: There’s never been any question about Rodney Hudson’s technique. Ever since he stepped on Florida State’s campus as a freshman, he’s been a starter and, in my opinion, Florida State’s best technician. 4 years later, he might be the best technician of any interior lineman in this class. Danny Watkins might have something to say about that.

His problem is his size and his athleticism. He has short arms and played in the 280s last year, which is very small, even for an interior lineman. Because of that lack of size, there’s been a lot of talk that he might have to move to center, which is a projection as he didn’t play much there in college, which hurts his stock.

He has bulked up to 299 for The Combine, but the point is he played in the 280 and considering his small frame and short arms, he might be maxed out. He hasn’t looked terrible in drills at 299, but it’s clear that’s not his true playing weight. He’s best suited for a zone blocking scheme, where power and strength isn’t a necessity.

As for his technique, he gets low and uses his hands well for someone of his age. He plays with a solid base and great leverage so he can matchup with guys who are a little bigger than him, but some much bigger guys, guys like Phil Taylor in Senior Bowl practices, he’s going to have a really tough time keeping them out of the backfield and double teams probably will be needed.

NFL Comparison: Eric Steinbach

 

Rob Sims Lions

 

 

Trade for Seahawks: We knew this was going to happen. New offensive line coach Alex Gibbs didn’t think Sims would fit into his scheme and he basically told him not to show up to camp until a trade was worked out. Anytime you do something like that, you’re pretty much guaranteeing you’ll get less value than you deserve because teams know, if a deal doesn’t get done, you’ll pretty much have to cut that player and then he can be had for free, but I credit the Seahawks for getting a 5th rounder for him. In an offseason where a starting cornerback gets you a 4th rounder, a star wide receiver gets you a 3rd and a 4th rounder, and a franchise quarterback gets you a 2nd and a 3rd, getting a 5th rounder for a starting caliber guard that doesn’t fit your scheme is not a bad. Decent trade.

Grade: B

Trade for Lions: Since this trade went down, all I am hearing is pretty much this “Yeeaahh, Lions, getting an offensive line upgrade for a 5th rounder, now we can draft Ndamukong Suh with the 2nd overall pick. Yeaahh! ESPN says Suh is the greatest thing in the history of the world. Yeaaahhh! Defensive Tackles! Patch work offensive lines! Yeaaaaahhh!”

I will agree that this pick makes it more likely that the Lions take Suh, but that’s not a good thing. Rob Sims is a decent guard. Jeff Backus is still a horrible left tackle. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, Backus is not the guy you want protecting Stafford in his developmental years. The Lions should take Okung anyway, move Backus to right guard, and keep their defensive line the way it is. I’d rather have a patch work defensive line and a stud left tackle than a patch work offensive line and a stud defensive tackle.

With Okung, Sims, Raiola, Backus, and Cherilus, that’s a very good offensive line. You’ve already gotten Stafford some good receivers, surround him with a great offensive line like that and use a 3rd or 4th rounder on another running back to pair with Kevin Smith behind that offensive line and you have, at least, a top 15 offense next year with a ton of potential for the future. Then use 2 picks in the first 4 rounds on defensive backs and your late rounders on depth front 7 guys and you have a fairly solid defense for the future. That’s a 7 or 8 win team next year and, with a few more smart drafts, that’s a 10, 11, 12 win team in 2 or 3 years.

You take Suh, you get an upgrade over the already decent Corey Williams at defensive tackle and a somewhat more decent front 7. Stafford takes 35-40 sacks again with Backus at left tackle and the scrubs they had at right guard last year still starting. Your offense struggles, Stafford either doesn’t develop right and gets David Carr syndrome or gets hurt. Your defense is a little bit stronger than it would have been with Corey Williams instead of Ndamukong Suh, but it doesn’t matter. You’re still a 5, 6, 7 win team spending 100 million dollars on the defensive tackle position and 73 million on a borderline starter quarterback and then in 4 or 5 years, you probably have to start all over because Stafford’s salary is too large to justify at his current rate of production. Not to mention, for the most part, offensive tackles are safer than defensive tackles.

As for what I think they will do, I’d say it’s 50-45 in favor of Okung, with that extra 5 percent going to the likelihood that they trade down and take a defensive back with the 5th-9th pick. That’s going to be very hard to do, but would not be an awful idea, granted they use the 2nd round pick they pick up to draft a left tackle like Roger Saffold or Jared Veldheer. It would certainly be better than tying up 65 million dollars in a defensive tackle. I just don’t think that’ll happen. Trading out of the top 5 is very hard to do, let alone the top 3 when there’s no franchise quarterbacks teams feel they need to move up for. The Browns and Bills know, after the Donovan McNabb trade, that Jimmy Clausen is pretty much guaranteed to be there at 5 where the Chiefs draft so there’s no need to move up to 2 to get him. The only possible trades I could see would be Kansas City moving up to get Okung, not likely, or the Redskins moving up to get Suh, as crazy as it sounds, it’s more likely than the Chiefs moving up. Trading down though, in terms of overall value, might be the smartest move because they’d pick up a 2010 and a 2011 2nd rounder in the process, at least, and still get a top 10 pick.

At the end of the day, I still think the Lions will go with Okung, seeing the greater value they can get out of him and I will continue to choose that in my mock draft until I hear something that says otherwise.

Grade: If they still draft Okung: A

If they draft Suh: D