2023 Week 4 NFL Picks

Pick of the Week

CLE 21 (-1.5) vs. BAL 16

High Confidence Picks

CHI 24 (+3.5) vs. DEN 23 Upset Pick +130

MIA 28 (+3) @ BUF 26 Upset Pick +125

Medium Confidence Picks

DET 27 (-2) @ GB 23

HOU 17 (+3) vs. PIT 16 Upset Pick +120

DAL 23 vs. NE 20 (+6.5)

SF 30 (-14) vs. ARZ 13

JAX 26 (-3) vs. ATL 20 (in London)

SEA 24 (-1.5) @ NYG 20

Low Confidence Picks

LAR 19 (+1) @ IND 17

MIN 27 (-4.5) @ CAR 20

PHI 27 (-8.5) vs. WAS 16

No Confidence Picks

NO 20 vs. TB 17 (+3.5)

LAC 26 vs. LV 21 (+6)

CIN 27 (-2.5) @ TEN 24

KC 24 @ NYJ 16 (+8.5)

Detroit Lions at Green Bay Packers: 2023 Week 4 NFL Pick

Detroit Lions (2-1) at Green Bay Packers (2-1)

This is a tough game to make a determination on right now because both teams have so many important players who are legitimately questionable with injury. For the Packers, the status of top running back Aaron Jones, expected top receiver Christian Watson, and top cornerback Jaire Alexander is in doubt, while the Lions’ stud left tackle Taylor Decker, starting running back David Montgomery, and expected starting cornerback Emmanuel Moseley all have uncertain statuses for this game as well.

That being said, I am strongly leaning towards taking the Lions in this one and possibly betting them, depending on the status of the aforementioned questionable players. While these two teams are even in terms of the amount and caliber of players who are questionable for this game, the Packers are still in a worse injury situation overall, with their top-2 offensive linemen David Bakhtiari and Elgton Jenkins, as well as stud every down linebacker De’Vondre Campbell already ruled out for this game, while the only key player the Lions will definitely be without is starting right guard Halapoulivaati Vaitai. 

The Lions are also the significantly better team overall, entering the season with an expected win total that was 2 wins higher than the Packers (9.5 vs. 7.5), a gap that has been backed up by the play of these two teams thus far this season. The Lions hold a significant edge in DVOA (+21.2% vs. +15.0%), yards per play differential (+1.18 vs. +0.17), and first down rate differential (+0.34% vs. -1.24%), despite facing a more difficult schedule, with both teams facing the Falcons, but the Packers facing the Bears and Saints, while the Lions have faced the Chiefs and Seahawks.

Despite the Lions being the better team and likely having the injury edge, they are only favored by 1.5 points here in Green Bay. It will depend on who ultimately plays in this game, but my calculated line has the Lions as deserving of being at least field goal favorites. I am going to leave this as a low confidence pick for now because of the injury uncertainty, but depending on the final injury report there is a strong chance I upgrade this to a medium confidence pick and place a bet on the Lions and, unless all of the Packers questionable players play and the Lions’ don’t, the Lions should be the better option for pick ‘em purposes.

Update: Aaron Jones and Christian Watson will play for the Packers, but Jaire Alexander is out, while David Montgomery and Taylor Decker will play for the Lions. This line has moved up to -2, but I think the Lions are bettable at that number, as my calculated line has Detroit favored by 4.

Detroit Lions 27 Green Bay Packers 23

Pick against the spread: Detroit -2

Confidence: Medium

2023 Week 3 NFL Picks

Pick of the Week

CLE 24 (-3) vs. TEN

High Confidence Picks

None

Medium Confidence Picks

SF 27 (-10.5) vs. NYG 13

BAL 24 vs. IND 19 (+8.5)

PIT 17 (+3) @ LV 16 Upset Pick +130

Low Confidence Picks

SEA 24 vs. CAR 20 (+5.5)

NE 20 (-2.5) @ NYJ 16

JAX 30 (-8) vs. HOU 20

LAC 30 (+1.5) @ MIN 28 Upset Pick +105

NO 23 (+1.5) @ GB 21 Upset Pick +105

No Confidence Picks

BUF 23 @ WAS 17 (+6.5)

MIA 31 (-6.5) vs. DEN 24

DET 30 (-3) vs. ATL 26

KC 28 vs. CHI 16 (+12.5)

DAL 24 @ ARZ 12 (+12.5)

PHI 24 @ TB 20 (+5.5)

CIN 23 (-2.5) vs. LAR 20

New York Giants at San Francisco 49ers: 2023 Week 3 NFL Pick

New York Giants (1-1) at San Francisco 49ers (2-0)

The Giants’ season got off to a disastrous start when they were blown out at home by the Cowboys 40-0 in week 1 and then subsequently went down 20-0 at halftime on the road in week 2 against a Cardinals team that is one of the worst in the league. However, the Giants rebounded in the second half of that Cardinals game to come from behind and win, averting a total catastrophe and salvaging a 1-1 record out of the first two weeks of the season.

Things don’t get easier for the Giants this week though, as they have to go on the road on a short week and face a 49ers team that is one of the best in the league. Teams typically struggle on the road on a short week against a superior non-divisional opponent, going 28-46 ATS and it’s even worse when a team is underdogs of more than a touchdown (6-17 ATS), which the Giants are here. The Giants could also be extra tired after staging their comeback last week, as underdogs are just 8-15 ATS the week after coming back from a deficit of 13+ after the third quarter and winning in a game in which they were favored.

This line is high at 10.5, but the 49ers enter this game 2nd in DVOA, while the Giants rank 32nd. That’s only a two game sample size, but the 49ers entered the season as a vastly superior team to the Giants, expected by the oddsmakers to win three more games than the Giants (10.5 vs. 7.5), and based on what we’ve seen thus far this season, that gap has only widened. Dating back to last season, 11 of the 49ers’ 15 wins have come by 11 points or more, so they’re clearly capable of blowing inferior teams out, especially at home, where 7 of those 11 blowout wins have come.

The 49ers also have a massive edge health wise, almost 20 points better in SIC score (92.2 vs. 73.7), as they are close to full strength, while the Giants are missing top offensive weapon Saquon Barkley and top offensive lineman Andrew Thomas, among other smaller injury absences. I don’t love that this line has gone above 10, jumping to 10.5 from 9.5 on the early line last week, but the Giants’ near loss to the Cardinals last week without Andrew Thomas and the subsequent loss of Saquon Barkley late in last week’s game justifies that line movement. I wouldn’t go crazy with this bet, but everything suggests this will be a very lopsided affair, so I don’t mind laying the 10.5 points.

San Francisco 49ers 27 New York Giants 13

Pick against the spread: San Francisco -10.5

Confidence: Medium

2023 Week 2 NFL Picks

Pick of the Week

CLE 24 (-2.5) @ PIT 17

High Confidence Picks

PHI 34 (-6) vs. MIN 23

LAC 23 (-2.5) @ TEN 17

Medium Confidence Picks

BUF 31 (-7.5) vs. OAK 20

CIN 26 (-3) vs. BAL 20

DET 31 (-4.5) vs. SEA 24

Low Confidence Picks

MIA 23 (-2.5) @ NE 20

KC 30 @ JAX 27 (+3.5)

No Confidence Picks

DAL 24 vs. NYJ 16 (+8.5)

IND 17 (PK) @ HOU 16

ATL 23 (-1.5) vs. GB 21

TB 23 (-2.5) vs. CHI 20

SF 23 @ LAR 17 (+7)

NYG 24 (-4) @ ARZ 19

DEN 20 vs. WAS 17 (+3.5)

NO 19 @ CAR 17 (+3)

Minnesota Vikings at Philadelphia Eagles: 2023 Week 2 NFL Pick

Minnesota Vikings (0-1) at Philadelphia Eagles (1-0)

The Vikings lost at home week 1 to a Buccaneers team that was expected to be mediocre at best coming into this season. The Vikings were favored by 5-6 points in that game depending on when you bet the line, so that loss was a surprise to many people, but it didn’t come out of nowhere. The Vikings finished last season 13-4, but needed an unprecedented 11-0 record in one-score games to do so, which history suggested they wouldn’t come close to repeating in 2023 (0-1 so far this season). 

The Vikings’ point differential last season was just -3 and because of a weak schedule their DVOA was even worse, ranking 27th, both of which are much more predictive year-to-year than winning percentage in one-score games is. On top of that, their roster looks worse going into 2023 than it did a year ago, losing key players like edge defender Za’Darius Smith, interior defender Dalvin Tomlinson, cornerback Patrick Peterson, middle linebacker Eric Kendricks, and feature back Dalvin Cook this off-season, without adding comparable replacements. 

Despite the Vikings’ loss last week, this line has actually moved in their favor since the early line a week ago, with the Vikings going from 7-point underdogs in this game in Philadelphia to now being just 6-point underdogs. The Eagles looked underwhelming in a near loss in New England last week, losing the first down rate and yards per play battle and only prevailing because they won the turnover battle and had a defensive touchdown, which are both very inconsistent on a week-to-week basis. Additionally, the Eagles will be without talented cornerback James Bradberry, starting safety Reed Blankenship, and starting running back Kenneth Gainwell in this game.

However, the Eagles still had a big DVOA edge over the Vikings in week 1 (17.1% vs. -4.1%), even before you take into account that the Eagles probably faced a tougher opponent than the Vikings did, and even with their injuries the Eagles still have a big roster edge over the Vikings, who have injuries of their own, with center Garrett Bradbury out and left tackle Christian Darrisaw and Marcus Davenport both considered highly questionable on a short week. With all of that considered, my calculated line has the Eagles favored by 12 points, so we’re getting a lot of line value with Philadelphia at only -6. 

My calculated line might sound high, but the Vikings lost by at least 17 points in two of the three games they played against teams who finished with double digit wins last season, including the Eagles, and the Vikings are probably worse this year than they were a year ago, especially with their current injuries. On top of that, the Vikings are in a bad spot this week, traveling on a short week to face a superior non-divisional opponent. Non-divisional road underdogs are just 27-46 ATS on Thursday Night Football all-time when both teams are on short rest. Between that and the line being too short, I like the Eagles a lot this week. If this was a Sunday game, I probably would make it my Pick of the Week, but I don’t like locking in my Pick of the Week this early so I am going to keep this as “just” a high confidence pick. Either way, I don’t expect this one to be close.

Philadelphia Eagles 34 Minnesota Vikings 23

Pick against the spread: Philadelphia -6

Confidence: High

2023 Week 1 NFL Picks

Tampa Bay Buccaneers (0-0) at Minnesota Vikings (0-0)

The Vikings went 13-4 last year, but they needed to go an unprecedented 11-0 in one-score games to do so, which history suggests they won’t repeat in 2023. Their point differential was just -3 and their DVOA was even worse, ranking 27th. On top of that, their roster looks worse going into 2023 than it did a year ago, losing key players like edge defender Za’Darius Smith, interior defender Dalvin Tomlinson, cornerback Patrick Peterson, middle linebacker Eric Kendricks, and feature back Dalvin Cook, without adding comparable replacements.

Despite that, the Vikings open the season as pretty sizable favorites, favored by six points here at home against the Buccaneers. The Buccaneers figure to be mediocre at best this season, but they probably won’t be as bad as some expect, as they still have talented players on both sides of the ball. This seems like a game they can be competitive in, against a Vikings team that didn’t blow many teams out last season and that got worse over the off-season. Of all the lines this week, this one seems the most off, as my calculated line has Minnesota favored by just a field goal, and on top of that, Minnesota might overlook the Buccaneers with a Thursday Night Football matchup against a much tougher Eagles team on deck (favorites cover at a 45.0% rate before Thursday Night Football), so this is my Pick of the Week.

Minnesota Vikings 23 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 20

Pick against the spread: Tampa Bay +6

Confidence: Pick of the Week

Houston Texans (0-0) at Baltimore Ravens (0-0)

The Texans have been arguably the worst team in the league over the past two seasons, with 16 losses by double digits over that span. There’s hope for them to be improved this season, but it might not happen right away. For one, they have a raw rookie quarterback CJ Stroud who could easily struggle in his debut. On top of that, the Texans enter the season with some concerning injuries, including three projected starting offensive linemen and one of their talented off-season acquisitions, safety Jimmie Ward.

Because of that, the Texans could easily suffer another double digit loss this week, on the road against a Ravens team that looks likely to be well above average again this season as long as Lamar Jackson is healthy, having gone 26-13 with Jackson as their starter over the past three seasons. This line is only 9.5, but I think the Ravens should be favored by at least 12, so we’re getting some good line value with the host. This isn’t a big bet, but I think this line is a little short and doesn’t fully take into account Houston’s injuries, so I think it’s worth a bet.

Baltimore Ravens 26 Houston Texans 13

Pick against the spread: Baltimore -9.5

Confidence: Medium

Cincinnati Bengals (0-0) at Cleveland Browns (0-0)

The Browns are my top sleeper team coming into the season. They finished last season 8th in offensive DVOA despite having backup Jacoby Brissett under center for the first eleven games of the season and then having Deshaun Watson struggle for the final six games upon his return. Watson should be better in his first full season in Cleveland in 2023 and the Browns surround him with a great offensive line and running game, as well as an improved receiving corps. Their defense was the bigger problem last season, finishing 23rd in defensive DVOA, but they were much more talented than that, they got significantly better as the season went on, and this off-season they have added even more talent and significantly improved their coaching with Jim Schwartz coming in. Even in the loaded AFC, I would consider the Browns contenders.

The Bengals are obviously contenders as well and I still have them ahead of the Browns, but they are favored by 1.5 points here in Cleveland and the talent level between these two teams is closer than that suggests. On top of that, the Bengals have started slow the past couple seasons because quarterback Joe Burrow was coming back from injury/illness, which is the case again this season, with Burrow missing almost all of training camp with a calf injury that reportedly is still affecting him somewhat. Add all of that together and the Browns have a great chance to pull the small upset at home, in a game in which they should be considered the favorites. The money line and/or the spread are both good values here.

Cleveland Browns 27 Cincinnati Bengals 24 Upset Pick +105

Pick against the spread: Cleveland +1.5

Confidence: Medium

Los Angeles Rams (0-0) at Seattle Seahawks (0-0)

The Rams won the Super Bowl during the 2021 season, but they sold out for years to do that, sacrificing high draft picks and future cap space for the chance to win now. It worked, but now they are paying the price in a big way, in what looks like a cap reset/tank year for this team. About 32.3% of their cap (72.7 million) is dead cap from players who are no longer on the team, with another 28.2% committed to Matt Stafford, Cooper Kupp, and Aaron Donald, leaving just 39.5% of the rest of their roster. The total average annual salary of their roster ranks dead last and that is a metric that correlates heavily with win total.

Stafford, Kupp, and Donald are still pretty high level players, but all three are on the wrong side of 30 and coming off of injury plagued seasons, so the Rams came into the season looking like one of the worst teams in the league overall and things have gone from bad to worse with Cooper Kupp hurt again and expected to miss at least this game, if not several more. The Seahawks aren’t a great team, but they’re at least decent and should be favored by more than 4.5 points against a Rams team that is probably one of the worst two or three teams in the league without Kupp. I like the Seahawks a good amount at that number, with my calculated line being Seattle -8.5.

Seattle Seahawks 23 Los Angeles Rams 13

Pick against the spread: Seattle -4.5

Confidence: High

Miami Dolphins (0-0) at Los Angeles Chargers (0-0)

At full strength, I would say these two teams are about comparable, but the Dolphins have a couple key injuries, with top cornerback Jalen Ramsey and talented left tackle Terron Armstead both out, which gives the Chargers the advantage. I still wouldn’t give the Chargers a big advantage though and, while the Chargers are also at home, they haven’t had much homefield advantage since moving to Los Angeles in 2017, leading to them going just 19-27 ATS at home over that stretch, as opposed to 29-18 ATS on the road. Given that, I think we’re getting a little bit of value with the Dolphins who are underdogs of a full field goal in this matchup. It’s not enough for the Dolphins to be worth betting, but they are the better side for pick ‘em purposes.

Los Angeles Chargers 27 Miami Dolphins 26

Pick against the spread: Miami +3

Confidence: Low

Las Vegas Raiders (0-0) at Denver Broncos (0-0)

The Broncos are favored by 3.5 points in this matchup, which seems about right given the slight, but not insignificant edge the Broncos have talent wise. Because of that, I don’t have a strong lean either way, but all things equal I tend to side with underdogs when the line is 3.5, just because +3.5 is the number that hits most often, covering over 53% of the time, which is not a coincidence. Games are decided by three points or fewer about 1 out of 4 times, with 1 out of 6 being decided by exactly a field goal, meaning that a line of 3.5 is actually much higher than most realize; in real probability terms it’s closer to 5.5 or 6 than it is to 3. As a result, odds makers will often use 3.5 to trap bettors into betting the favorite, as bettors don’t realize how high the line actually is. That alone doesn’t make the Raiders bettable, but I would pick them for pick ‘em purposes.

Denver Broncos 27 Las Vegas Raiders 24

Pick against the spread: Las Vegas +3.5

Confidence: None

Carolina Panthers (0-0) at Atlanta Falcons (0-0)

As I’ve mentioned, +3.5 is my favorite line to bet because +3.5 is the number that hits most often, covering over 53% of the time, which is not a coincidence, given how many games are decided by exactly a field goal. In this case, these two teams are closer together in my roster rankings than this line would suggest, which makes +3.5 look like an even more intriguing bet. I don’t want to lock this bet in though because of the possibility that Panthers holdout Brian Burns doesn’t play, which would be a big loss for a Panthers team that already is in worse shape injury wise than their opponents, with talented right guard Austin Corbett out and multiple injuries to key wide receivers. I would take the Panthers at +3.5 either way, but I would need Burns to play at least in some capacity for the Panthers to be bettable.

Update: Brian Burns is likely to play and the Panthers will also have one of their top wide receivers Adam Thielen healthy, so I am comfortable betting the +3.5.

Atlanta Falcons 24 Carolina Panthers 23

Pick against the spread: Carolina +3.5

Confidence: Medium

Tennessee Titans (0-0) at New Orleans Saints (0-0)

I have the Saints winning 11 games this season and the Titans winning 6, which might make you think that we’re getting good value with the Saints as mere field goal home favorites over the Titans, but these two teams projected records have more to do with differences in their schedules than it does with a big talent gap between these two teams, as I have the Saints just two points ahead of the Titans in my roster rankings. That still leads me to lean towards the favorites at home, but there’s not enough here for that to be bettable.

New Orleans Saints 24 Tennessee Titans 20

Pick against the spread: New Orleans -3

Confidence: Low

Jacksonville Jaguars (0-0) at Indianapolis Colts (0-0)

The Jaguars are by far the best team in their division and have a big talent advantage over the Colts, who are breaking in a raw rookie quarterback while also missing their top offensive player Jonathan Taylor, but it’s still hard to get to the Jaguars deserving to be favored by 5 points on the road. I think the Jaguars are a little overvalued based on how they finished last season, when they had a massive injury edge over most of their opponents, as they were one of the healthiest teams in the league all season. 

Now, the Jaguars are without suspended left tackle Cam Robinson, useful rotational defensive lineman Dawuane Smoot, and top interior defender Da’Von Hamilton so, even with Taylor out for the Colts, I wouldn’t say the Jaguars have the significant injury edge in this one. They should still win this game and there’s not enough here for the Colts to be worth betting, but I think this game has a better chance to be close than most think, with the Jaguars being one of the highest bet sides of the week. At the very least, the Colts are a good contrarian pick for pick ‘em purposes this week.

Jacksonville Jaguars 23 Indianapolis Colts 20

Pick against the spread: Indianapolis +5

Confidence: Low

Arizona Cardinals (0-0) at Washington Commanders (0-0)

I have the Commanders winning just five games this season, but some of that has to do with their tough schedule and I don’t think they’re a terrible team. One game they should almost definitely win is this one, hosting the Cardinals in what should be their easiest game of the season. Not only do the Cardinals have arguably the worst roster in the league, but they’re also starting veteran journeyman Josh Dobbs, who they acquired just a few weeks ago, in place of injured quarterback Kyler Murray. 

The Commanders are without talented edge defender Chase Young, but they still shouldn’t have much trouble with the Cardinals in this one. I’m not confident enough to lay the full touchdown with a mediocre Commanders team, but the Cardinals are going to be close to unbettable all season and the Commanders should win this one with relative ease, so they should at the very least be the better side for pick ‘em purposes.

Washington Commanders 23 Arizona Cardinals 13

Pick against the spread: Washington -7

Confidence: Low

Dallas Cowboys (0-0) at New York Giants (0-0)

Here is another +3.5, this time with the Giants being underdogs at home. Like the other +3.5s, I am immediately drawn to the underdog because of how often +3.5 hits. The Cowboys are significantly better than the Giants and I have them four wins better in my previews despite a similar schedule, but I don’t think the difference between these two teams is enough to justify the Cowboys being favored by more than a field goal on the road. There’s not enough here for the Giants to be bettable, but I like them for pick ‘em purposes.

Dallas Cowboys 26 New York Giants 24

Pick against the spread: NY Giants +3.5

Confidence: Low

San Francisco 49ers (0-0) at Pittsburgh Steelers (0-0)

The Steelers are a solid team that is only likely to miss the playoffs because of their schedule and the overall strength of their conference, but there’s still a big gap between them and a team like the 49ers, who should be one of the better teams in the league. The Steelers are getting some points at home, but this line is less than a field goal, which means for me to be confident taking them I would have to give them a pretty good chance of pulling the straight up upset and I think they fall just short of that. I think this line is about right and if this line was a full field goal, I would take the Steelers, but I am going with the 49ers for pick ‘em purposes, as the single most likely outcome of this game is the 49ers winning by a field goal.

San Francisco 49ers 20 Pittsburgh Steelers 17

Pick against the spread: San Francisco -2.5

Confidence: None

Buffalo Bills (0-0) at New York Jets (0-0)

Here is another line of 2.5, favoring the Bills on the road at the Jets. In this case, I think there is enough of a chance of the Jets pulling the straight up upset for them to be the right side for pick ‘em purposes. My calculated line is Buffalo -1.5, which isn’t much line value and the Bills are still more likely than not to win, which they could easily do by a field goal, so this is still a no confidence pick, but I am taking the Jets for pick ‘em purposes.

Buffalo Bills 24 New York Jets 23

Pick against the spread: NY Jets +2.5

Confidence: None

Philadelphia Eagles (0-0) at New England Patriots (0-0)

The Patriots have the big situational edge here, as Super Bowl runner ups like the Eagles tend to struggle in week 1, going just 4-19 ATS since 2000, while the Patriots have much more to prove and could get an emotional boost from Tom Brady’s retirement ceremony at halftime. The Eagles also have to play again in four days on Thursday Night Football and could get caught looking forward to that game (favorites cover at a 45.0% rate before Thursday Night Football). However, I think this line is a little short at Philadelphia -4, as the Eagles massive talent edge over the Patriots should have them as 6-point favorites, in normal circumstances. These aren’t normal circumstances, given the aforementioned situational trends and the Patriots seem like the better side for pick ‘em purposes, but I can’t take them with any confidence at this number.

Update: The Patriots will be down three offensive linemen for this game, including top offensive lineman Mike Onwenu. Right tackle Riley Reiff was expected to be out, but Onwenu and fellow guard Cole Strange seemed likely to play. I think that’s going to be too much for the Patriots to overcome in this game, even though they’re in a much better spot situationally. I’m flipping this pick to the Eagles, though still for no confidence.

Philadelphia Eagles 23 New England Patriots 17

Pick against the spread: Philadelphia -4

Confidence: None

Green Bay Packers (0-0) at Chicago Bears (0-0)

I have these two teams about equal in my roster rankings, with the Bears getting better this off-season after several significant off-season additions, while the Packers are likely to take a step back after getting rid of Aaron Rodgers and turning to unproven Jordan Love, who will also be without his top wide receiver Christian Watson this week due to injury. The Bears have a key injury as well, with talented guard Teven Jenkins out for the first four weeks of the season at least, but without Watson, I would still have these two teams about even. The Bears are at home and only favored by one point, which I think is a little short, but my calculated line of Chicago -2.5 doesn’t cross any key numbers, so I can’t be that confident in them. The single most likely outcome of this game is the Bears winning by a field goal, but the Packers also could easily pull the small upset, so this is a low confidence pick.

Chicago Bears 26 Green Bay Packers 23

Pick against the spread: Chicago -1

Confidence: Low

Detroit Lions at Kansas City Chiefs: 2023 Week 1 NFL Pick

Detroit Lions (0-0) at Kansas City Chiefs (0-0)

This one is a tough call. The Chiefs are only 4.5-point home favorites, which if they were at full strength would be way too low, but they also enter the season already missing some key personnel. All-Pro interior defender Chris Jones continues to hold out for a better contract. Talented edge defender Charles Omenihu is suspended. And making matters even worse, by far their most important offensive weapon Travis Kelce seems likely to miss this game after suffering a knee injury in practice two days prior to kickoff.

If Kelce plays at something close to full strength, we’re probably getting a little bit of line value with the Chiefs against a Lions team that enters the season with a lot of hype because of a near playoff appearance with a young roster a year ago, but that also hasn’t proven they are worth the hype yet and that could disappoint now that they have real expectations. The Chiefs also have the benefit of being at home for the first time since winning the Super Bowl, a spot teams are 12-5-1 ATS in since 2005. 

However, the Chiefs are likely to be cautious with their star tight end, given how important he is to their long-term goals and that they’ll have 10 days off to rest him after this game, so it’s hard to take the Chiefs with any confidence. I would take the Chiefs for pick ‘em purposes because I liked them before the Kelce injury and I think this line has adjusted appropriately (down from Kansas City -6.5) and I might bump this up to a low confidence pick if Kelce seems like he’s going to end up playing and the line doesn’t move significantly, but for now this is a no confidence pick and I can’t see myself betting on the Chiefs regardless of Kelce’s status.

Kansas City Chiefs 31 Detroit Lions 26

Pick against the spread: Kansas City -4.5

Confidence: None

2023 NFL Season Previews

AFC EastAFC NorthAFC SouthAFC West
Buffalo Bills* 12-5Cincinnati Bengals* 13-4Jacksonville Jaguars* 9-8Kansas City Chiefs* 14-3
Miami Dolphins 10-7Cleveland Browns* 12-5Tennessee Titans 6-11Los Angeles Chargers* 11-6
New York Jets 9-8Baltimore Ravens* 12-5Indianapolis Colts 6-11Denver Broncos 6-11
New England Patriots 7-10Pittsburgh Steelers 8-9Houston Texans 6-11Las Vegas Raiders 5-12
NFC EastNFC NorthNFC SouthNFC West
Philadelphia Eagles* 14-3Detroit Lions* 10-7New Orleans Saints* 11-6San Francisco 49ers* 12-5
Dallas Cowboys* 11-6Green Bay Packers 7-10Atlanta Falcons* 8-9Seattle Seahawks* 8-9
New York Giants 7-10Chicago Bears 7-10Carolina Panthers 7-10Los Angeles Rams 5-12
Washington Commanders 5-12Minnesota Vikings 6-11Tampa Bay Buccaneers 6-11Arizona Cardinals 2-15

*=playoff qualifer

AFC Wild Card Round

#2 Cincinnati Bengals over #7 Los Angeles Chargers

#3 Buffalo Bills over #6 Baltimore Ravens

#5 Cleveland Browns over #4 Jacksonville Jaguars

NFC Wild Card Round

#2 San Francisco 49ers over #7 Atlanta Falcons

#3 New Orleans Saints over #6 Seattle Seahawks

#5 Dallas Cowboys over #4 Detroit Lions

AFC Divisional Round

#1 Kansas City Chiefs over #5 Cleveland Browns

#2 Cincinnati Bengals over #3 Buffalo Bills

NFC Divisional Round

#1 Philadelphia Eagles over #5 Dallas Cowboys

#2 San Francisco 49ers over #3 New Orleans Saints

AFC Championship

#2 Cincinnati Bengals over #1 Kansas City Chiefs

NFC Championship

#2 San Francisco 49ers over #1 Philadelphia Eagles

Super Bowl

Cincinnati Bengals over San Francisco 49ers

Buffalo Bills 2023 NFL Season Preview

Quarterbacks

For 17 seasons from 2000-2016, the Bills didn’t qualify for the post-season once, one of the longest post-season droughts in the modern era. They made it in 2017, but they barely snuck in with a record of 9-7 and their 21st ranked DVOA suggested they were lucky to even win that many games, so the Bills knew they had to get better long-term. The Bills have made a bunch of moves to improve this roster since then, but their biggest decision was taking a shot on quarterback Josh Allen with the 7th overall pick in the 2018 NFL Draft.

The quarterback position had plagued the Bills for years, with 16 different starting quarterbacks over their 17-year post-season drought, including a pair of first round busts who never amounted to anything (JP Losman and EJ Manuel), but the Bills actually had a decent veteran option in Tyrod Taylor at the time of the Josh Allen selection and it was a big risk for the Bills to give up picks to trade up to select Allen 7th overall, given how raw he was as a prospect. Allen had the physical tools to be an elite quarterback in the NFL, but didn’t show it consistently at the collegiate level, posting mediocre stats on a mediocre team at the University of Wyoming.

As a rookie, Allen showed his physical tools, but also his concerning accuracy, rushing for 7.09 YPC and 8 touchdowns on 89 carries, but completing just 52.8% of his passes for an average of 6.48 YPA, 10 touchdowns, and 12 interceptions and posting just a 58.0 PFF grade as a passer, on a Bills team that took a step backwards from their post-season appearance the year before, finishing with a 6-10 record and a 28th ranked DVOA. 

However, the Bills got better around the quarterback the following off-season and, while Allen still had his share of struggles, he showed significant progress as a passer in year two in 2019, completing 58.8% of his passes for an average of 6.71 YPA, 20 touchdowns, and 9 interceptions and posting a 61.9 PFF grade as a passer, while also averaging a 4.68 YPC average and 9 touchdowns on 109 carries, en route to leading the Bills to a 13th ranked finish in DVOA their best record since 1999 at 10-6, securing the team their second playoff appearance in three seasons.

From there, things only got better for the Bills. The team they had spent two decades looking up at in the standings and consistently losing to head-to-head, the New England Patriots, lost their long-time franchise quarterback Tom Brady during the 2020 off-season and, at the same time, Josh Allen broke out as a legitimate franchise quarterback for the Bills in year three. In three seasons since, Allen has completed 65.2% of his passes for an average of 7.41 YPA, 108 touchdowns, and 39 interceptions, with 5.59 YPC and 21 touchdowns on 348 carries, and overall PFF grades of 90.9, 86.6, 91.6, while the Bills have won the division three straight times and have gone a combined 37-12 in the regular season, the second best record in the league over that stretch, only behind the Kansas City Chiefs. In terms of DVOA, the Bills have ranked 4th, 2nd, and 1st over the past three seasons.

Unfortunately, for the Bills, this regular season success hasn’t translated to the post-season yet, as the Bills have lost before the Super Bowl in all three seasons, twice to the Chiefs and last season to the Bengals, who have emerged as the other two powerhouses in the AFC at the same time as the Bills. The Bills have a similarly strong roster this season as they have had in the past three seasons and Josh Allen remains an elite quarterback in his prime (age 27 seasons), so the Bills should still be considered among the best teams in the conference, but their conference and division have both gotten significantly better since last season, which hurts their chances of making it out of the AFC and playing in their first Super Bowl in three decades.

Obviously losing Josh Allen for an extended period of time would hurt their chances significantly of even making the post-season, regardless of who was backing him up, but even as far as backup quarterbacks go, the Bills have pretty mediocre ones with veteran journeymen Kyle Allen and Matt Barkley expected to compete for the #2 job behind Josh Allen. Barkley has been with the Bills for years, first joining the team in 2018, and he knows the playbook well, but he has just one start and 97 pass attempts in his tenure with the Bills and the 10-year veteran has a career QB rating of just 66.6 in 7 career starts, while Kyle Allen has a career QB rating of just 82.2 in 19 career starts. Josh Allen’s presence obviously makes this an enviable quarterback room and he hasn’t missed a start with injury in the past four seasons, despite taking more hits than the average quarterback because of his playing style, but it would be a big concern if Allen did suffer an injury that caused him to miss a significant amount of time.

Grade: A

Receiving Corps

Aside from Josh Allen, probably the biggest addition the Bills have made to turn this franchise around is wide receiver Stefon Diggs, who they acquired from Minnesota for a first round pick during the 2020 off-season. That coincides with when Josh Allen and the Bills really took off as a team and, while Diggs doesn’t deserve all the credit, he has been one of the best wide receivers in the league over that span, with a 2.29 yards per route run average and slash lines of 127/1535/8, 103/1225/10, and 108/1429/11. 

Diggs wasn’t as productive early in his career in Minnesota, but that was in large part because the Vikings were a much run-heavier offense than the Bills. Including his time in Minnesota, Diggs’ career yards per route run average is 2.12 and he’s exceeded a 75 grade on PFF in all eight seasons, including five seasons over 80 and a career best 90.1 grade in 2022. Diggs is now heading into his age 30 season and will probably start to decline soon, but even if he drops off a little, he should remain one of the best wide receivers in the league in 2023.

The rest of this receiving corps is a bit of a concern though. When the Bills first acquired Diggs, they had other useful receivers in Cole Beasley and John Brown, but those veterans declined and are no longer with the team and the Bills haven’t really found good replacements. Gabe Davis, a 4th round pick in 2020, was given every opportunity to have a big year opposite Diggs in 2022, after averaging 1.29 yards per route run as a rookie and 1.62 yards per route run in his second season in the league in 2021, but Davis didn’t make the most of that, falling back to 1.43 yards per route run and only catching 51.6% of his 93 targets. 

Davis did average 17.4 yards per catch and his 48/836/7 slash line wasn’t bad overall, but he had 3/171/2 of that in one game and was very inconsistent throughout the year, falling below 40 receiving yards 8 times in 15 games and catching 3 of fewer passes 10 times, which kept this offense from it’s highest potential. Meanwhile, slot receiver Isaiah McKenzie was even worse, with just a 42/423/4 slash line on 65 targets and 1.10 yards per route run, while tight end Dawson Knox had just a 48/517/6 slash line also on 65 targets, also with 1.10 yards per route run.

The Bills didn’t really do much to improve this group this off-season, at least in the short-term. Davis looks likely to be locked into the #2 receiver job, without any real competition added, and the Bills will hope he can take a step forward, still only in his age 24 season, which is at least a possibility, even if it might not be a strong one. McKenzie is gone, but the veteran options they signed to potentially replace him, Trent Sherfield and Deonte Harty, are both underwhelming, which likely means Khalil Shakir, who averaged just 1.14 yards per route run in limited action as a 5th round rookie in 2022, and Justin Shorter, a 5th round pick in this year’s draft, will also compete for playing time behind DIggs and Davis. 

Harty has flashed potential with 2.05 yards per route run in four seasons in the league, but the former undrafted free agent has never gotten consistent playing time, leading to him having just 64 career catches, and at 5-6 170 it’s hard to see him ever being effective as anything more than a situational player. Sherfield, meanwhile, has averaged just 0.91 yards per route run in five seasons in the league, with a career high of 30 catches in a season and a total of 67 catches in his career. Whoever wins the #3 receiver job will almost definitely struggle in that role and it’s very possible the Bills will mix and match their options depending on the situation to try to get the most out of this underwhelming group.

The one big addition the Bills made to this group this off-season was using their first round pick on tight end Dalton Kincaid, who was arguably the best receiving tight end in the draft. With Dawson Knox still being on the team and at least being a decent, if unspectacular tight end option (1.13 yards per route run in four seasons in the league since going in the 3rd round in 2019), the Bills will probably use a lot more two-tight end sets this season to offset their lack of depth at the wide receiver position, with Kincaid likely to spend a lot of the year as essentially a big slot receiver option at 6-4 246. However, rookie tight ends rarely make a big impact in year one and it’s unlikely Kincaid will be the consistent #2 option that the Bills lacked last season. This isn’t a bad receiving corps, especially with #1 wide receiver Stefon Diggs elevating this group significantly by himself, but there are concerns with this group after Diggs.

Grade: B+

Running Backs

Over the past two seasons respectively, the Bills have ranked 6th in yards per carry with 4.79 and 2nd in yards per carry with 5.19, but much of that is because of Josh Allen’s dominance on the ground, averaging 6.20 YPC on 246 carries. Lead back Devin Singletary averaged 4.63 YPC on 365 carries over that stretch, but he benefited significantly from defenses worrying about Josh Allen running or Josh Allen throwing it deep, making life much easier for Bills running backs, and the Bills felt they could do better than him this off-season, letting him sign with the Texans on a 1-year, 2.75 million dollar deal. Singletary also played heavily in passing situations, but was highly inefficient, averaging just 0.72 yards per route run and 5.03 yards per target in his four seasons in Buffalo.

To replace Singletary, the Bills signed ex-Patriots running back Damien Harris to a 1-year, 1.77 million dollar deal and they will give a bigger role to 2022 2nd round pick James Cook, who impressed in limited action as a rookie, averaging 5.70 YPC on 89 carries and 1.43 yards per route run as a pass catcher. Harris had a solid 4.66 YPC average with 20 touchdowns on 449 carries in his four seasons in New England, who selected him in the 3rd round in 2019, and he figures to have a significant role as an early down back in Buffalo, but Cook also figures to have a significant early down role, in addition to being their primary passing down back, with Harris averaging 1.10 yards per route run for his career, with just 40 catches in 38 career games. 

Harris and Cook figure to be a good running back tandem, with Cook having the potential for a big breakout year in his second season in the league, even if he isn’t as efficient as he was a year ago and even if he splits carries with Harris. On top of that, the Bills have good depth, signing veteran Latavius Murray to be their 3rd running back. Murray is going into his age 33 season, might not have much left in the tank, and only has a career 0.91 yards per route run average in the passing game, but Murray has averaged 4.22 YPC on 1,481 carries a in 10 seasons in the league, including 4.39 YPC on 160 carries just last season, so you could do a lot worse as your #3 back and he should be able to fill in at least a few carries per game if needed. This is a pretty deep backfield and their likely top back James Cook has the potential for a big year in year two.

Grade: A-

Offensive Line

The biggest weakness on this Bills’ offense last season was their offensive line, as they ranked 22nd on PFF in team pass blocking grade and 28th in team run blocking grade, and the guard position was particularly a problem. Left guard Rodger Saffold made every start, but finished with just a 43.7 PFF grade and, while right guard Ryan Bates was better with a 61.8 PFF grade, he’s an underwhelming starting option as a former undrafted free agent who had only made four nondescript starts in four seasons in the league prior to last season.

To upgrade the guard position, the Bills cut Saffold, signed Connor McGovern and David Edwards as veteran options, and then used a 2nd round pick on Florida’s O’Cyrus Torrence. Those three will compete for the two starting spots with Bates and, while all four options have their problems, this should be a better position group by default than a year ago. Torrence has the most upside of the bunch and could wind up being the best guard from this draft when all is said and done, but he could have some growing pains in year one. Edwards had PFF grades of 70.3 and 66.9 in 2020 and 2021 respectively, while making 31 total starts, and he is only in his age 26 season, but concussion limited him to just 4 starts last season and, at one point, seemed to threaten his career. 

Edwards and Torrence are probably their best two options, but they will have to compete for the job, given that the Bills’ other options have some potential too. McGovern has made 29 starts over the past 3 seasons, went in the 3rd round in 2019, and had a 61.7 PFF grade in 8 starts in 2020 and 68.7 PFF grade in 6 starts in 2021, but that fell to 52.2 in 15 starts in 2022 in the most action of his career. He’s only in his age 26 season though, so there’s still some potential there. Bates, as I mentioned, is a former undrafted free agent with a limited history of starting and probably doesn’t have a high upside, but he was at least serviceable a year ago and potentially could do that again. They have a good chance to find a couple at least decent starters out of these four.

Right tackle was also a position of weakness last season, with Spencer Brown (14 starts) and David Quessenberry (3 starts) finishing with PFF grades of 51.4 and 59.3 respectively last season. The Bills did add veteran journeyman Brandon Shell to the mix this off-season and he’s been a capable starter for most of his career and could be an option for the Bills this season, but he’s also going into his age 31 season and has never exceeded 14 starts in a season in seven seasons in the league, so he’s a pretty underwhelming option, even if he could be an upgrade by default over what they got at the position last season. 

Fortunately, the Bills could get bounce back years from either Brown or Quessenberry. Brown was a 3rd round pick in 2021 and had a decent 62.6 PFF grade in 10 starts as a rookie, before regressing in year two, and he easily could bounce back at least to his rookie year form in his third season in the league in 2023. Quessenberry, meanwhile, had a 80.6 PFF grade as a 17-game starter in 2021, but he is also a complete one-year wonder who has just 10 career starts and a career high 61.7 PFF grade for a season aside from his 2021 campaign. Now going into his age 33 season, it seems unlikely he will bounce all the way back to his 2021 form, but he could at least be better in 2023 than he was in 2022.

At center and left tackle respectively, veterans Mitch Morse and Dion Dawkins are locked into starting roles again this season. Morse has been a solid starter throughout his 8-year career, making 109 total starts and exceeding 60 on PFF in all eight seasons, but his 61.4 PFF grade in 2022 was a career worst and now he’s going into his age 31 season, so his best days are probably behind him and he could easily continue declining, in which case he would likely end up as a below average starter, even if only slightly.

Dawkins is the best of the bunch, making 89 starts in six seasons in the league, since going in the second round in 2017, and finishing with PFF grades of 83.0, 69.9, 73.4, 78.1, 77.5, and 73.5 in those six seasons respectively. Still only in his age 29 season, Dawkins should remain an above average starting option in 2023. This offensive line will probably be better than a year ago, but this is still an underwhelming group overall, even with Dion Dawkins elevating this group by himself.

Grade: B-

Edge Defenders

In addition to their impressive offense, which ranked 2nd in offensive DVOA last season, the Bills also had a strong defense in 2022, ranking 4th in defensive DVOA. It’s much tougher to be consistently great on defense than it is to be consistently great on offense and defensive performance is much less predictive year-to-year than offensive performance, but there are reasons that the Bills have a better chance to remain a high-level defense than most teams would. 

For one, the Bills also had an elite defense in 2021, ranking 1st in defensive DVOA, so last year wasn’t a fluke. The Bills also are bringing back most of their key players from a year ago, with 17 of their top-18 in terms of snaps played last season still on the team this season. The Bills also added some key players in free agency this off-season and should be better at some positions than they were a year ago and they should be healthier than a year ago, when they actually had the 2nd most adjusted games lost to injury in the league on defense, excelling defensively despite several key absences.

One position group that should be better than a year ago is the edge defender group. Not only will they likely get a healthier year out of top edge defender Von Miller, who was limited to 450 snaps played in 11 games by injury last season, but they also added veteran Leonard Floyd in free agency on a 1-year, 7 million dollar deal to give them even more depth at the position. With 2021 1st round pick Greg Rousseau, 2020 2nd round pick AJ Epenesa, and 2021 2nd round pick Boogie Basham also in the mix, the Bills have a very deep group at this position.

If healthy, Von Miller has a good chance to remain the best of the bunch. There is some concern with Miller being in his age 34 season and coming off of a major injury, but the future Hall of Famer has surpassed a 79 grade on PFF in all 12 seasons in the league, with a whopping eight seasons over 90, and he didn’t show any real signs of decline before his injury last season, with a 85.8 PFF grade and 8 sacks, 4 hits, and a 14.5% pressure rate, not far off from his career pass rush stats of 123.5 sacks, 133 hits, and a 15.7% pressure rate in 162 career games. 

Between his age and his significant injury, there’s a good chance Miller declines at least somewhat in 2023, but he’s declining from such a high level that he has a good chance to remain one of the better players in the league at his position, even if he isn’t quite as good as he’s been in the past, and the Bills should benefit from having him likely be more available than he was a year ago, even if it’s possible he isn’t quite ready to return in week 1.

If Miller isn’t the Bills’ top edge defender this season, it will probably have more to do with the performance of Greg Rousseau in his third season in the league than Miller declining significantly. Rousseau has been limited to snap counts of 531 and 463 in his first two seasons in the league respectively, but that was partially because he missed four games with injury in 2023 and he’s impressed when on the field, with a 70.2 PFF grade as a rookie and then a 83.6 PFF grade in year two, when he had 8 sacks, 6 hits, and a 14.0% pressure rate, despite his limited playing time. He probably won’t get a ton of playing time in 2023, even if he does continue improving, just because this is a very deep position, but the first round pick has a ton of upside and his third season in the league could end up being his best year yet.

Basham and Epenesa could also take a step forward in 2023, though they don’t nearly have the upside that Rousseau has. Basham has only played 589 snaps in 23 games in two seasons in the league in a very deep position group, but he’s received decent grades of 62.2 and 66.4 from PFF and could take a step forward and/or see more playing time in his third season in the league in 2023. Epenesa is in a pretty similar situation, having only played 332 snaps per season in his first three seasons in the league and posting mostly middling grades, but having the upside to take a step forward in his fourth season in the league in 2023, still only in his age 25 season, making him actually a year younger than Basham, even though Basham was drafted the year after Epenesa.

The veteran Floyd came relatively cheap in free agency, but he should have a role even in this deep position group and he was a good value. Floyd has averaged 895 snaps played per season over the past five seasons and has 47.5 sacks, 54 hits, and a 10.4% pressure rate in 104 games in seven seasons in the league, while surpassing 60 on PFF in all seven seasons. Last season, he had a 65.7 PFF grade across 932 snaps with 9 sacks, 12 hits, and 11.2% pressure rate. He’s in his age 31 season now, but he also figures to see his snap count cut probably by about half in Buffalo, which should keep him fresher and allow him to be more efficient as he ages, so he should still be a useful part of their edge defender rotation, barring an unexpected massive drop off. 

Floyd’s presence will likely force veteran Shaq Lawson off the roster, just purely in a numbers game, but he wasn’t bad with a 61.8 PFF grade on 467 snaps last season and he’s mostly been a useful rotational edge defender in his career, surpassing 60 on PFF in five of the past six seasons, while playing an average of 489 snaps per season, so, even if he’s unlikely to make their final roster, he’s still good insurance to have if someone gets hurt between now and the start of the season. This is arguably the best edge defender group in the league, with high level talent in Von Miller and Greg Rousseau, as well as great depth. 

Grade: A

Interior Defenders

At the interior defender position, the Bills bring back their top-4 in terms of snaps played last season, DaQuan Jones (643 snaps), Ed Oliver (526 snaps), Tim Settle (372 snaps), and Jordan Phillips (347 snaps). Jones and Oliver figure to remain the starters after solid seasons in which they had PFF grades of 72.6 and 68.5 respectively. That wasn’t out of the ordinary for those two either. Jones has played an average of 630 snaps per season over the past eight seasons, while surpassing 60 on PFF in all eight seasons, including five seasons over 70. He’s at his best against the run, but also has a decent 6.1% pressure rate for his career. The concern with him is he’s going into his age 32 season and could start to decline soon, but he hasn’t shown any signs of decline yet and, even if he does drop off somewhat in 2023, he has a good chance to remain at least a decent starting option.

Ed Oliver, meanwhile, has been inconsistent against the run in four seasons in the league, since being selected 9th overall in 2019, but he’s consistently been an above average pass rusher, with 14.5 sacks, 34 hits, and a 9.1% pressure rate in 62 career games, and he’s coming off of a career best 68.7 grade against the run in 2022. Still only in his age 26 season, it’s possible he could have further untapped upside and, even if he doesn’t, he should remain at least a solid starting option with above average interior pass rush ability.

The Bills depth options were underwhelming last season, with Settle and Phillips finishing with PFF grades of 53.8 and 52.2 respectively, but the Bills did make an addition at this position this off-season that should improve their depth, with veteran Poona Ford coming over from the Seahawks on a 1-year, 2.25 million dollar deal, which could be a steal. Ford comes cheap because he finished last season with a career worst 56.2 PFF grade on 642 snaps, but the 2018 undrafted free agent had a 90.3 PFF grade on 231 snaps as a rookie, a 73.4 PFF grade on 506 snaps in 2019, a 81.9 PFF grade on 670 snaps in 2020, and a 73.0 PFF grade on 802 snaps in 2021, so he has obvious bounce back potential in 2023, still only in his age 28 season, especially since he is unlikely to have to play the same snap count as he did in his final seasons in Seattle. 

Throughout his career, Ford has been at his best against the run, but he also has a solid 6.4% pressure rate for his career and should be a useful, well-rounded reserve for this team. The Bills also could get a better year out of Tim Settle, who exceeded 60 on PFF in each of his first four seasons in the league prior to joining the Bills last off-season. He only averaged 252 snaps per game in those four seasons, but the Bills won’t need much more than that from him in 2023 and, still only in his age 26 season, the 2018 5th round pick has obvious bounce back potential. 

Jordan Phillips is probably the worst of the bunch, as he’s been below 60 on PFF in all but one of his eight seasons in the league and is now heading into his age 31 season, but the Bills won’t need much, if anything from him in 2023 with Ford being added and, as mediocre as he’s been overall in his career, he does have a decent 7.4% career pressure rate, with his poor run defense usually being the cause of his mediocre overall grades. This is a pretty solid position group overall, one that should have better play from their reserves than they did a year ago.

Grade: B+

Linebackers

The one key player from last year’s defense that the Bills didn’t retain this off-season is linebacker Tremaine Edmunds. Edmunds had a 79.0 PFF grade across 760 snaps in 13 games and there’s no way around the fact that losing him is a big deal, but this is still a very talented defense even without him, with likely better health than a year ago and the additions of Leonard Floyd and Poona Ford on the defensive line. Even the Bills’ linebacking corps is still in good shape without Edmunds, with other top linebacker Matt Milano (73.7 PFF grade across 946 snaps) still on the roster and a pair of intriguing young players who will compete to replace Edmunds, 2022 3rd round pick Terrel Bernard, who flashed some potential in very limited action as a rookie (111 snaps), and this year’s 3rd round pick, Tulane’s Dorian Williams.

Both Bernard and Williams are raw and are obviously projections to larger roles and, even if they do pan out, they are highly unlikely to be as good as Edmunds was a year ago, but they’re not bad options either and it wouldn’t be a surprise at all if whoever wins that position battle ended up being at least a capable starter. Milano, meanwhile, has exceeded 70 on PFF in three of the past five seasons, including back-to-back seasons in 2021 and 2022, and he’s averaged 55.5 snaps per game in those five seasons, including 60.1 snaps per game over the past two seasons, so he’s more than capable of being a top every down linebacker, still only in his age 28 season.

The Bills also still have Tyrel Dodson, who was technically their third linebacker a year ago, playing 220 snaps in just 8 games, but he struggled mightily with a 48.4 PFF grade and the 2019 undrafted free agent has never exceeded a 60 grade on PFF for a season, while playing just 471 snaps total in his career, so he’s probably not a realistic starting option, even with Edmunds gone. Losing Tremaine Edmunds obviously hurts, but, even without him, this is not a bad linebacking corps and the Bills have more than enough talent at other positions to make up for the loss of Edmunds.

Grade: B+

Secondary

The position group that should benefit most from being healthier this season is the Bills’ secondary, which saw talented safety Micah Hyde go down for the season in week 2 and only got 307 snaps in six games out of expected top cornerback Tre’Davious White, who did not look like himself after a late season return from a torn ACL suffered late in the 2021 season, finishing the 2022 season with just a 61.9 PFF grade in his limited action. 

Hyde will almost definitely play more games in 2023 than a year ago and he had finished above 75 on PFF in four of his previous five seasons prior to the injury, so his return will be very much welcome, even if he could start to decline, now in his age 33 season. Meanwhile, White has a great chance to bounce back, another year removed from the injury, still only in his age 28 season, with three seasons over 75 in coverage grade on PFF in his five seasons in the league prior to 2022.

Hyde will start next to Jordan Poyer, also a long-time above average safety, who is also getting up there in age, in his age 32 season. Poyer could easily start declining this season, but he’s finished with PFF grades of 74.2, 75.2, 78.2, and 75.4 over the past four seasons respectively, with just five games missed over that stretch, so he hasn’t shown any signs of decline yet and, even if he starts declining this season, he’s declining from a high enough level that he should remain at least an above average starter, barring an unexpected massive decline.

At cornerback, in addition to likely a healthier year out of Tre’Davious White, the Bills should also get a better year out of Kaiir Elam, who was a first round pick in 2022, but struggled with a 56.7 PFF grade on 477 rookie year snaps, failing to secure a consistent starting role (six starts), despite the absence of White. Elam has the potential to be a lot better in year two though and is probably the favorite to start opposite White. 

The Bills also have a solid slot cornerback in Taron Johnson, who has exceeded a 60 grade on PFF in all five seasons in the league, including a 68.3 PFF grade on a career high 969 snaps in 2022. Johnson can play outside, in addition to on the slot, which he did more than ever last season, so he’s also a candidate to start next to White, with Elam coming in as the third cornerback when Johnson moves to the slot, but Johnson is at his best on the slot and the Bills would probably prefer to let him focus on that.

With Hyde and White expected to be healthier, Damar Hamlin (845 snaps) and Dane Johnson (830 snaps) are expected to move back to reserve roles in 2023. Hamlin was actually decent with a 61.4 PFF grade last season, before his season ended in scary fashion when he collapsed during the Bills’ week 17 game against the Bengals, and assuming he can make a full recovery, the 2021 6th round pick is a solid reserve option. In addition to last season’s decent performance in a starting role, Hamlin also flashed a lot of potential as a rookie in 2021, albeit on just 50 snaps.

Dane Johnson, meanwhile, struggled with a 57.5 PFF grade in his extended action last season and, as a result, he is probably not a real candidate to compete with Elam and Taron Johnson for a top-3 job, but the 2020 7th round pick was decent depth on snap counts of 193 and 482 in his first two seasons in the league and is not a bad reserve cornerback. The Bills also have 2022 6th round pick Christian Benford, who saw 363 rookie year snaps and, at times, played ahead of the much higher drafted Kaiir Elam, but Benford too struggled with a 55.7 PFF grade and would be best as a reserve option as well. This secondary should be much better than a year ago with White and Hyde likely to be healthier and Kaiir Elam expected to be better in his second season in the league. This is a deep and talented group overall.

Grade: A-

Conclusion

The Bills have been one of the better teams in the league over the past three seasons, finishing in the top-4 in DVOA in all three seasons, including back-to-back seasons in the top-10 in both offensive and defensive DVOA. They have a good chance to do that again in 2023, with minimal key losses on either side of the ball this off-season. Losing Tremaine Edmunds hurts their defense, but they should be much healthier on that side of the ball this season, with Micah Hyde, Von Miller, and Tre’Davious White being the most noteworthy players who will almost definitely be more available this season, and they added a pair of key rotational players on the defensive line in Leonard Floyd and Poona Ford, so they could easily remain a top defense in 2023, even without Edmunds. 

The Bills haven’t broken through and won or even made the Super Bowl yet, and the AFC is even better this year, so they will have a tough path out to that elusive Super Bowl appearance, but they have as good of a chance as any team to win the AFC and, if they do that, they would almost definitely be favored in the Super Bowl over any team in the weaker NFC. I will have a final prediction at the end of the off-season when all previews are completed.

Prediction: 12-5, 1st in AFC East