New England Patriots 2013 NFL Season Preview

Introduction

The Patriots have thrown up a bunch of points over the past few seasons, scoring 33.1 points per game dating back to the 2010 season, by far most in the NFL. Green Bay has scored the 2nd most at 28.7 points per game. Last season, they had their highest points total over that 3 year stretch, averaging 34.8 points per game, the 3rd highest average since the NFL switched to a 16-game schedule, behind the 2007 Patriots and the 2011 Packers.

They’ve also had the NFL’s top offensive DVOA in 2 of the last 3 seasons and in terms of all-time offensive DVOA, dating back to 1991, they’ve ranked in the top-10 in each of the last 3 seasons, ranking #1 all-time in 2010, #6 all-time in 2011, and tied for #10 all-time in 2012 (they also ranked #2 in 2007). They’ve been easily the top offensive team in the NFL over the past 3 seasons. Their defense hasn’t always been great, but their offense has propelled them to top-12 all-time finishes in DVOA in both 2010 (#3) and 2012 (#11), along with their #2 all-time finish in 2007. Last year, they had a 3-year high in defensive DVOA, ranking 15th, and they also ranked 9th in the NFL in scoring defense, allowing 20.7 points per game.

However, this off-season their offense took a major hit. Of their top-5 receivers from last year, 4 are no longer with the team and the other, Rob Gronkowski, has had 5 surgeries in the last calendar year, leaving his status for the start of the season very much in doubt. Wes Welker signed with the Broncos and Danny Woodhead with the Chargers. Brandon Lloyd has been released. And Aaron Hernandez, well, he could be going away for a long-time. He was released by the team in late June on the day that he was arrested for what eventually was revealed to be murder, not just obstruction of justice, in the Odin Lloyd case.

I don’t foresee Tom Brady having a major decline (even at age 36) so whether or not they can continue to produce the kind of points they’ve been producing over the past few seasons is going to be largely dependent on their new receiving corps. It’s hard to imagine them being a bad offensive team or even an average offensive team, but they could be a noticeably worse offensive team (even 4-6 points per game fewer would have a noticeable effect on this team and their ability to win games). I’ll get to the receiving corps and whether or not I think they’ll continue to be a top level offensive team in the receiving corps section.

Defensively, they should be largely the same. It’s an improved unit over what it’s been in recent years, but it’s not a top level unit by any stretch of the imagination. One thing that ordinarily would be a sign of an impending decline in win total is the Patriots’ absurd turnover margin from 2012. They had a turnover margin of +25, 41 takeaways and 16 giveaways, by far the best in the NFL.

That tends to be unsustainable on a year-to-year basis. For example, teams with 20 or fewer turnovers on average turn the ball over 25.5 times the following season, while teams that turn the ball over 35 or more times turn the ball over 28.1 times the following season. Teams with 20 or fewer takeaways take the ball away an average of 25.3 times the following season, while teams with 35 or more takeaways take the ball away an average of 27.3 times the following season. Teams with a turnover differential of +15 or higher have a turnover differential of +3.6 the following season, while teams with a turnover differential of -15 have a turnover differential of +1.5 the following season.

However, the Patriots could be an exception for a number of reasons. For one, they didn’t recover an absurd amount of fumbles last season. In fact, they recovered less than 50% of fumbles that hit the ground, recovering 46.7%, and they still were +14 in fumbles. They were just very good at holding onto the football and knocking the football out, which is more sustainable than being good at recovering the ball once it hits the ground.

The 2nd reason is that they have an elite quarterback. Tom Brady isn’t going to suddenly start throwing a bunch of interceptions. Brady’s 2012 interception rate of 1.3% was only slightly below his 6-year interception rate (dating back to 2007), which is 1.6%. His career interception rate is slightly higher at 2.1%, but even if he had thrown an interception on 2.1% of his attempts last year, it would have only been 5 more interceptions. A slight decline in ability given his age and the decline of his supporting cast could lead to a few more interceptions, but this is a guy who has never thrown more than 14 interceptions in a season and a guy who has one of the best career interception rates of all time (2nd lowest all-time among eligible quarterbacks behind Aaron Rodgers). He’s not going to start tossing a bunch of picks.

The third reason is that the Patriots always seem to be able to have impressive turnover margins and defy the aforementioned trend. Tom Brady’s ability to avoid interceptions is part of it, but it’s more than that. They frequently rank among the best in the NFL in takeaways and fumbles. They’ve been +16 or better in turnovers in 4 of the last 6 seasons, averaging +15.5 over that stretch and +23.3 over the past 3 years. After New England and Green Bay (+12.7), no other team is better than +6.5 (Atlanta) over that 6 year stretch. I think we’re at the point where we can consider them an outlier. They may decline a bit in this aspect this season, but they can be expected to once again pick off a lot of passes, force a lot of fumbles, fumble infrequently, and of course rarely throw an interception as long as Tom Brady is under center.

Quarterback

Brady himself probably won’t significantly decline this season. He’s going into his age 36 season, but has shown no significant signs of decline. Last season was the worst of his past 3 seasons as he “only” completed 63.0% of his passes for an average of 7.6 YPA, 34 touchdowns, and 8 interceptions, but those were still all at or above his career averages. He could, however, see a statistical and production drop-off if his supporting cast doesn’t live up to what it’s been recently.

Grade: A

Wide Receivers/Tight Ends

As I mentioned, whether or not the receiving corps can live up to what it’s been recently is going to be the single most important factor in whether or not the Patriots can continue to throw up massive amounts of points and win a lot of games. It’s the only significant difference on offense from last year to this year and it’s such an important discussion for that reason.

Wes Welker is gone, after signing a 2-year, 12 million dollar deal with the Broncos. The Patriots only offered him 10 million over 2 years, but were willing to pony up 28.5 million over 5 years with 10 million guaranteed for replacement Danny Amendola, which suggests that they feel that Amendola can not only replace Welker, but give them a younger upgrade.

Amendola and Welker have similar backgrounds as former undrafted smallish slot receivers who went to Texas Tech and came to New England from “lesser” franchises. Amendola, coming over from St. Louis, is two years older than Welker was coming over from Miami, but he also has 100 more receptions in just 10 more games. He’s certainly more proven than Welker upon arrival, which is why he commanded a larger salary. However, that doesn’t necessarily mean he’ll be better.

Welker’s biggest advantage over Amendola is his sturdiness. Welker missed just 3 games in 6 seasons with the Patriots, while Amendola has played in just 42 of 64 possible games to this point in his career. Sure, Welker benefitted from tearing his ACL at the end of a season rather than in the beginning, but that was just a fluke injury and one he returned from incredibly fast. Amendola, meanwhile, has been on the injury report a ton over his career, especially the last two seasons, with various ailments. Playing the slot and going over the middle can definitely lead to injuries, especially when you’re catching 100+ passes per season in there. Welker is built like a truck and built to handle all of those hits. Amendola just might not be.

On top of that, Welker’s greatest talent was his chemistry with Tom Brady and that’s something Amendola might not necessarily have. Amendola is a more talented player and a more versatile player who the Patriots will use outside on occasion because of his better height and speed, which they almost never did with Welker, but it might not translate to better production. Welker averaged 112 catches per year over the past 6 years, making him responsible for roughly 30% of the Patriots completions over that time period.

All that being said, Amendola will still be productive and if he plays all 16 games he should catch 100+ passes. Assuming he doesn’t get hurt, he’s not a serious downgrade and it’s very possible that if the Patriots had kept Welker, who is going into his age 32 season this year, they might have seen him decline noticeably. Amendola could very well be an upgrade in that sense and he’s 4 years younger and still in the prime of his career, so he’ll give them more years.

The Patriots really seemed to prefer signing Amendola over Welker, low-balling Welker, while giving Amendola a more lucrative deal and targeting him early in free agency, reaching an agreement with him before Welker had even signed with the Broncos. They’re usually right about this type of thing. I think they made the right move for the future and I don’t expect them to noticeably miss Welker’s presence this season, assuming Amendola doesn’t get seriously injured.

Brandon Lloyd was their 2nd leading receiver last year, but he should be the easiest to replace. Lloyd did catch 74 passes for 911 yards and 4 touchdowns last season, but he’s still available as a free agent for a number of different reasons and the Patriots appear to have made the right move cutting him and going with a youth movement on the outside.

Lloyd had those 74 catches for 911 yards on 129 targets, a 57.4% completion and just 7.1 yards per attempt, both significantly lower than Brady’s numbers throwing anywhere else. He also dropped 7 passes and averaged just 2.4 yards after catch per catch, 6th worst in the NFL and worst among anyone who caught as many passes as he did. He also averaged just 1.53 yards per route run, 49th in the NFL out of 82 eligible, despite having a great quarterback throwing him the ball. Brady made him look a lot better than he is.

On top of that, he’s going into his age 32 season and has been known to be a bad teammate. The fact that his biggest believer Patriots Offensive Coordinator Josh McDaniels didn’t put up a fight for him to be kept around on what was not even that big of a salary is very concerning. There’s a reason he’s still unsigned as of this writing and he may remain unsigned going into the season.

In his place, the Patriots have 3 young receivers, 2nd round rookie Aaron Dobson, 4th round rookie Josh Boyce, and undrafted rookie Kenbrell Thompkins. It’s very tough to rely on a rookie receiver, let alone three of them, but reports out of Patriots Training Camp have been very positive on this trio and their chemistry with Tom Brady. Brady should be able to make them look better than they are, like he did with Lloyd. The biggest concern here is mental lapses with players in the first year of their career and their first year in a complex playbook.

Aaron Hernandez would seem to be a big loss at the tight end position, but Brady was without Hernandez for much of last season and it didn’t seem to affect him negatively. In fact, he actually produced better WITHOUT Hernandez last year. He completed 65.3% of his passes for an average of 8.0 YPA, 15 touchdowns, and 1 interception in 7 games without him last year, leading the offense to 38.9 points per game and a 5-2 record. With him, he completed 60.6% of his passes for an average of 7.3 YPA, 23 touchdowns, and 9 interceptions, leading the offense to 30.8 points per game and an 8-3 record.

Now, I’m not arguing that Brady is better off without Hernandez. That’s not a big enough sample size to support what would be a pretty absurd statement. However, Brady adapts to changing receiving corps better than maybe any quarterback in the NFL. Losing Hernandez won’t hurt him nearly as much as it would hurt another quarterback. Remember, from 2001-2007 Brady had 5 different leading receivers in 7 years and only Randy Moss, who the Patriots got for a mere 4th round pick, ever did anything of note before or after joining forces with Tom Brady. Aside from Moss, those receivers were Troy Brown, Reche Caldwell, David Givens, and Deion Branch. Ben Watson was his tight end. This year, undrafted rookie Zach Sudfield is expected to be the move tight end in Hernandez’s absence this season, though he won’t see nearly as many snaps as Hernandez would have. He’s looked good in Training Camp, however.

Rob Gronkowski, however, is a different monster. Brady completed 65.1% of his passes for an average of 7.6 YPA, 21 touchdowns, and 3 interceptions, while leading the offense to 35.8 points per game and a 7-3 record in the 10 games where Gronk played and wasn’t limited. In his other 8 games, he completed just 58.7% of his passes for an average of 7.4 YPA, 17 touchdowns, and 7 interceptions, while leading the offense to 31.6 points per game and a 6-2 record.

Those numbers aren’t bad and they further prove that Brady can produce and put up points no matter who is running routes for him, but they’re noticeably worse. Unlike Hernandez, Gronkowski is not just a big wide receiver. He catches the ball as an inline tight end better than anyone in recent memory and his impact as a run blocker and as a goal line target are much harder to replace. Despite his limited playing time, he was still ProFootballFocus’ #1 tight end last season, a spot he held by a large margin in 2011. Also despite his limited playing time, Gronk was 7th among tight ends in receiving yards last season and still led the position in touchdowns. He was 4th at his position in run blocking grade, which he was #1 in the prior season. He also has an absurd 36 touchdowns in his last 35 games, dating back to the midpoint of his rookie season. He’s by far the most irreplaceable of their receivers from last year’s receiving corps.

Fortunately for Brady, Gronkowski is still on the roster. That much is certain, but that’s about where the certainty ends. Gronk has had 5 surgeries in the last calendar year, 4 on a broken arm that wouldn’t heal and a 5th on his back, which is the one that has his status for the start of the season in doubt. He had the surgery in June and was given roughly a 3 month recovery period. He also had back surgery in college, which is why he fell to the 2nd round of the draft.

Of course, because these are the Patriots, we’re not going to be able to find out anything about his status until right up to the start of the season. Reports this week have ranged from “he’ll be ready for week 1” to “he’ll start the season on the Physically Unable to Perform list and miss at least the first 6 games.” However, even conservative estimations should have him back by the middle of the season, giving him plenty of time to get re-acclimated for the stretch run and the post-season.

The Patriots are still by far the best team in their division and once again have a very easy regular season schedule, especially to start the season (only 2 of their first 8 games are against teams that finished .500 or better last season) so getting him 100% by the post-season is going to be the biggest thing. Even conservative estimations suggest they should be able to do that, assuming the increasingly brittle Gronk doesn’t reinjure himself. I actually think there’s a solid chance Gronk played more snaps (743) and has more production (55/790/11) than he did last year and that would be a very good thing for this offense. Daniel Fells and Jake Ballard, two blocking type tight ends, would play in Gronk’s absence for any games he misses.

The X-factor in the receiving game is running back Shane Vereen. Vereen will likely be taking over Danny Woodhead’s old pass catching back role and Woodhead was 5th on the team with 40 catches for 446 yards and 3 touchdowns last season, before leaving for San Diego this off-season. Vereen, however, has the ability to be even more than that. The 2011 2nd round pick is a more talented and explosive back and, including the playoffs, he had 15 catches for 254 receiving yards and 3 touchdowns on just 117 pass snaps last season. He’s been lining up all over the formation this off-season and he could be the Patriots’ version of Darren Sproles or Reggie Bush.

The Patriots’ receiving corps might not be as good as it’s been recently, but they have some talented players for Brady to throw to. They’ll have to reinvent their offense again, using fewer two-tight end sets, but they have more depth outside at wide receiver and they also have Vereen. Brady should once again make the best of it and lead this offense to a bunch of points. It’s still better than what he had pre-2007. Scoring 30 points per game and leading the NFL in points again isn’t improbable.

Grade: B-

Running Backs

One thing the Patriots could do to reinvent their offense this season is running more. They certainly have the running back talent to do so. 2011 3rd round pick Stevan Ridley rushed for 1263 yards and 12 touchdowns on 290 attempts last season. The Patriots’ strong passing game and offensive line undoubtedly helped, but he still had 2.5 yards per carry after contact, broke 29 tackles, and was ProFootballFocus’ 7th ranked running back in rushing grade. The Patriots hadn’t had anything like him at the running back position since Corey Dillon was in his prime. Before him, BenJarvus Green-Ellis was a plodder and nothing else. Before him, Laurence Maroney was inconsistent, ranging from solid to all kinds of crap. It hadn’t been since Dillon’s final season in 2006 that the Patriots had a back with Ridley’s explosiveness.

They have plenty of depth at the position as well. Shane Vereen will serve as a solid change of pace back, in addition to lining up all over the formation as a receiver. Brandon Bolden and LeGarrette Blount, meanwhile, will compete to spell Ridley on running downs. Bolden flashed as an undrafted rookie last year, rushing for 274 yards on 2 touchdowns on 56 carries, but injuries limited him, as they did throughout his collegiate career, which is why he went undrafted. Blount, meanwhile, had a great rookie year in 2010 in Tampa Bay as an undrafted free agent, rushing for 1007 yards and 6 touchdowns on 201 carries, but his work ethic led to struggles in 2011 and then to him losing his starting job in 2012. He was traded to New England this off-season and they will try him as a reclamation project.

The Patriots ran plenty last season, ranking 2nd in rushing attempts behind Seattle with 523. However, they could run even more this season as they didn’t actually run on that high a percentage of their plays last season. They also ranked 4th in the NFL with 641 passing attempts. They just ran a ton of plays because of their super hurry up offense. No team ran more than the 74.3 plays per game they ran last season because no team ran plays faster than they did last season, running one roughly every 25 seconds.

That type of offense can put a lot of pressure on your defense if you’re not moving the ball consistently, but the Patriots had a ridiculous 7.4 first downs for every punt last season. For comparison, Denver was 2nd with 5.7 first downs per punt. As long as they’re continuing to move the ball well this season, I don’t see why they wouldn’t continue to run this type of offense. They’re spending much of Training Camp practicing with Chip Kelly and the high octane Eagles this off-season so I don’t see that changing any time soon. There will be plenty of rushing attempts either way, but they could actually lead the league in rushing attempts this season if they decide to run more often. 550 rush attempts is not unrealistic so Ridley should get plenty of carries. Vereen and Bolden/Blount will also see carries.

Grade: B+

[google_ad]

Offensive Line

As I mentioned, the Patriots excelled in run blocking last season, ranking 2nd to the 49ers on ProFootballFocus. However, it’s much more important that they excel in pass protection, which they also did last season. The Patriots ranked 9th in the NFL on ProFootballFocus in pass blocking and 14th in pass block efficiency. As a result, Brady was pressured on just 25.0% of his drop backs, 3rd among eligible quarterbacks.

This is incredibly important because Brady’s one weakness is that he does not throw well at when his timing is disrupted. Let me say it this way: Tom Brady is a bad quarterback when his timing is disrupted, more so than any other franchise quarterback in the NFL. No quarterback sees his completion percentage drop under pressure like Brady.

Last season, he completed just 40.4% of his pressured throws, 33rd out of 38 eligible, roughly a 23% drop from his regular completion percentage. Playoffs included, he completed 38.0% of his passes under pressure and 68.8% of his passes when not under pressure. This is nothing new. Over the past 4 seasons, he only has completed 280 of 592 passes (47.3%) and thrown 27 touchdowns to 16 interceptions under pressure, as opposed to 1389 for 1999 (69.5%) with 128 touchdowns to 31 interceptions while not under pressure.

Of course, good luck pressuring him. Not only does he have a great offensive line in front of him, but he also helps them out and makes them look even better than they are because he has one of the quickest releases in the NFL. His 2.42 seconds to throw ranked 5th in the NFL last season and in 2011 he ranked 6th taking 2.47 seconds to throw. You also can’t just blitz him because he’s one of the best quarterbacks against the blitz in the NFL, completing 471 for 740 (63.6%) for 6235 yards (8.4 YPA) and 55 touchdowns to 8 interceptions when blitzed over the last 4 seasons. However, if you can beat the Patriots’ offensive line quickly with only 4 guys, Brady is very, very unbeatable. This isn’t new knowledge though. I guarantee every team around the league knows this, but it’s much, much easier said than done.

The Patriots return all 5 starters from last year’s offensive line and, with the exception of right guard Dan Connolly, all of them should start in the same spot again. Connolly was the weak point of their line last season, grading out only average. Going into his age 31 season, he’ll have to hold off Marcus Cannon, who has graded out significantly above average in 338 snaps in his career, for the starting job. Cannon was seen as a 2nd round prospect by some teams prior to the 2011 NFL Draft, but he fell to the 5th round because he was diagnosed with lymphoma shortly before the draft. Now almost 2 years in remission, Cannon looks like a steal for the Patriots and someone who could have a great year if he wins the starting job.

The rest of the offensive line is the same. 2011 1st round pick Nate Solder broke out on the blindside in his 2nd season in the league, after playing well as a swing tackle, primarily on the right side, as a rookie. In 2012, he was ProFootballFocus’ 17th ranked offensive tackle and he could be even better in his 3rd year in the league in 2013.

Opposite him, Sebastian Vollmer was retained as a free agent. He was ProFootballFocus’ 13th ranked offensive tackle last season, 4th among right tackles. A 2009 2nd round pick, Vollmer has been great since day 1, grading out 10th in 2009, 18th in 2010, and 23rd in 2011, despite only playing 6 games with injury in 2011. He’s a minor injury risk and he has some knee and back problems that limited his market in free agency, forcing him to settle for a 4-year, 17 million dollar deal with the Patriots, but he’s only missed 5 games in the other 3 seasons combined and he’s practicing fine in Training Camp.

On the inside of the offensive line, Logan Mankins will continue to play left guard. He’s going into his age 31 season and has been limited by various injuries over the past two years, but he’s still graded out well above average in both seasons. He was a top-6 guard on ProFootballFocus from 2008-2010 before injuries, despite playing just 9 games in 2010 due to a holdout. He remains one of the better guards in the NFL, but he’s on the decline.

Rounding out the line, the Patriots have Ryan Wendell at center. Wendell played incredibly well in his first season as a starter in 2012, grading out as ProFootballFocus’ 4th ranked center. He was #1 among centers in run blocking, though he did grade out below average in pass protection. He’s still a one year wonder, but it’s worth noting he graded out above average on 566 snaps as a reserve in 2010 and 2011, so there’s a good chance he can keep this up.

At the very least, 4 of the Patriots’ 5 starting offensive linemen are above average players and that’s at the very least. It’s one of the better offensive lines in the NFL. If it were Brady’s offensive line that were in shambles and not his receiving corps, there’d be reason for concern, but I do believe the Patriots will be able to continue putting up lots of points. There’s still a lot of talent around Brady, especially at running back and on the offensive line. It’s still more talent than he had pre-2006.

Grade: A

Defensive Line

On the defensive line, the Patriots have a potential breakout star in defensive end Chandler Jones, the 21st pick in the 2012 NFL Draft. Jones didn’t have a lot of production at Syracuse due to injuries, but his off the charts athleticism sent his stock soaring in the months before draft day. Jones measured in at 6-5 266 with 35 ½ inch arms at The Combine, drawing comparisons to Jason Pierre-Paul. While he didn’t match JPP’s 40 time with a nondescript 4.87, he showed his athleticism with a 35 inch vertical and a 10 foot broad jump. Experts agreed he had the frame to get up to 280-285 comfortably and that while he might not do a whole lot as a rookie, he had a bright future.

Those who considered him a project had to be shocked by how well he came out of the gate in 2012. Through 8 games, heading into the Patriots’ bye, Jones had 6 sacks, 8 hits, and 20 hurries and won Defensive Rookie of the Month in September. He was on pace for 12 sacks, 16 hits, and 40 hurries, which would have put him among the best pass rushers in the league as a mere rookie. He did all this while grading out above average against the run as well. However, injuries again found him. He only missed 2 games the rest of the way, but injuries sapped his explosiveness and he managed just 1 hit and 8 hurries (with no sacks) the rest of the way.

However, with a full year under his belt, Jones still has plenty of potential going into his 2nd year in the league and beyond. He turned just 23 in February and, even after injuries sapped his production, his rookie year still exceeded expectations of those who thought he was a project. He finished the year as ProFootballFocus’ 16th ranked 4-3 defensive end. If he can stay healthy in his 2nd year in the league, the sky is the limit for him and he could easily have a double digit sack year.

Opposite him, the Patriots have another above average starting defensive end, the underrated Rob Ninkovich. Ninkovich moved to the defensive line full time last season, starting 14 games at defensive end and 2 as a tweener linebacker who moves to the line on passing downs, which was his original role in 2011. He could play some linebacker again this season if injuries strike, but the Patriots prefer him on the line.

He graded out above average at both positions, played the run well, and had 9 sacks, 8 hits, and 25 hurries on 505 pass rush snaps, a modest, but not terrible 8.3% pass rush rate. He graded out slightly below average against the run. The Patriots added another tweener linebacker to the mix in 2nd round rookie Jamie Collins, who will provide depth at both positions and possibly see some pass rush snaps in sub packages. Justin Francis and Jermaine Cunningham, both of whom graded out well below average last season, remain the top defensive end reserves.

At defensive tackle, Vince Wilfork is the big name. Wilfork has graded out significantly above average in each of the last 5 seasons, including two top-10 seasons and last year had his best year in 3 years, grading out 11th at his position. The big 6-1 325 pounder took a little bit to get adjusted to playing 4-3 defensive tackle rather than 3-4 nose, but he’s always had tremendous movement ability for his size and last season graded out above average both as a run stopper and a pass rusher, though he was better against the run. The only concern is he’s going into his age 32 season, but he hasn’t shown any signs of slowing down.

The Patriots did lose Brandon Deaderick and Kyle Love this off-season, releasing both of them. They were just run stopping rotational players, but they didn’t really replace them. Tommy Kelly will start next to Wilfork, but he was one of the worst defensive tackles in the league last year in Oakland, grading out 74th out of 85 eligible. Going into his age 33 season, he’s unlikely to get better and he also reportedly has had some really attitude and work ethic issues. Perhaps the Patriot Way can get the most of him, but I think it’s much more likely he remains one of the worst starting defensive tackles in the NFL.

With two aging starters, the Patriots could really use their young reserves stepping up. Armond Armstead was signed this off-season, coming over from the CFL. Armstead was at one time a highly rated prospect at USC, but a heart attack caused him to go undrafted and forced him to go to Canada to prove himself. He did just that, making the All-Star team as a rookie with 6 sacks and now comes back to America hoping to follow in the footsteps of Cameron Wake and Brandon Browner as CFL success stories. The Patriots signing him was described by some people are getting a free 3rd round pick as he likely would have gone in that range if eligible for the 2013 NFL Draft. Marcus Forston is the other young reserve. The 2012 undrafted free agent played just 8 snaps as a rookie and despite positive reports about him, he remains much less likely than Armstead to have a positive impact, especially this season.

Grade: B

Linebackers

The Patriots may have the best 4-3 linebacking corps in the NFL and it makes sense considering how much they’ve focused on the position early in the draft of late. I already mentioned Collins, a 2nd round rookie who will see a minimal role this season, but Dont’a Hightower and Jerod Mayo are both former 1st round picks, while Brandon Spikes was a 2nd round rookie. All 3 have panned out.

Mayo is the best of the bunch and one of the best non-rush linebackers in the NFL, really coming into his own since the Patriots moved to a 4-3 defense, which allowed him to play 4-3 outside linebacker and really use his sideline to sideline ability. He’s graded out 7th and 2nd respectively in 2011 and 2012 among 4-3 outside linebackers and can be considered one of the best in the NFL at the position.

Hightower is the other every down linebacker. He’ll play outside in base packages, but move to middle linebacker in place of Spikes in sub packages. Despite being limited to 579 snaps as a rookie with injury and playing one game at middle linebacker, he was still ProFootballFocus’ 8th ranked 4-3 outside linebacker. Going into his 2nd year in the league, he could be even better and really emerge as an above average starter.

Spikes in the middle is a pure two-down linebacker who comes off the field in sub packages for a 5th defensive back, but he’s great at what he does, which is stopping the run. No middle linebacker had a higher run stopping grade than he did last season and overall he graded out 9th at his position. He also was above average against the run in 2011, though not the top middle linebacker in the league. He should remain a talented run stuffer.

Grade: A

[yard_barker]

Secondary

New England’s defense got better as the season went on. Before week 11, the Patriots allowed 22.4 points per game and 8.0 yards per pass attempt in 9 games. In their final 7 games, they allowed just 18.4 points per game and allowed just 7.2 yards per attempt. What was the difference? Well, the addition of Aqib Talib at cornerback and the development of rookie cornerback Alfonzo Dennard into a starter allowed week 1 starters Devin McCourty and Kyle Arrington to move to safety and slot cornerback respectively.

Talib allowed 22 catches on 33 attempts for 304 yards, 2 touchdowns, and an interception, while deflecting 2 passes and committing 3 penalties with the Patriots. Those raw numbers don’t look great, but he usually lined up on opponent’s #1 receivers and his presence made the rest of the secondary better. They really missed him in their playoff loss to the Ravens. He’s also been better in the past, grading out noticeably above average in each of his first 4 years in the league since being drafted in the 1st round in 2008.

Dennard was the better of the two starting cornerbacks, grading out above average on 601 snaps, allowing 31 catches on 61 attempts for 436 yards, 4 touchdowns, and 3 interceptions, while deflecting 6 passes and committing 5 penalties. He was especially good down the stretch, allowing 15 catches on 30 attempts for 234 yards, 2 touchdowns, and 1 interception, while deflecting 4 passes and committing 1 penalty from week 11 on through the end of the regular season. He was very impressive for a rookie and he could be even better in his 2nd season in 2013, his first full season in the league as a starter. He was seen as a 2nd round prospect before getting arrested for assaulting a police officer a week before the draft and he’s a perfect fit for the Patriots’ coverage scheme.

They may have found a steal with him. The one issue is that he was arrested again this off-season for DUI, which may have been in violation of his probation and lead to a suspension or in season jail time (he’s currently scheduled to serve his 30 day sentence for assaulting a police officer next off-season). If he were to miss time, 3rd round rookie Logan Ryan would probably see action, which would be an obvious downgrade. However, Dennard didn’t actually fail a breathalyzer test. The officer just said he didn’t blow hard enough. That could make the charges much tougher to have stick.

With Talib and Dennard outside, it allows Kyle Arrington to focus on the slot. On the outside last season, Arrington allowed 20 catches on 28 attempts, but he only allowed 26 catches on 42 attempts on the slot. He’s not a great player in either place, but the 5-10 196 pounder is clearly a more natural fit on the slot. He graded out just about average overall last season.

With Talib, Dennard, and Arrington at cornerback, it allows Devin McCourty to play safety, where he is awesome. This isn’t to say he was bad at cornerback, but McCourty allowed just 5 completions in 8 games at safety. He was great in both spots and his composite grade would have made him the #4 ranked safety and the #5 ranked cornerback, but I think safety is a better fit for his skill set. In his first full season at the position, he could really emerge as one of the top safeties in the NFL.

The one hole in the secondary is the other safety spot. Adrian Wilson was signed to start in that spot, but he graded out below average last season and started coming off the field in obvious passing situations down the stretch. He lined up within 8 yards of the line of scrimmage on 62.3% of his snaps last season, 5th most among safeties, and is a pure box safety. He was better in 2011, actually grading out as ProFootballFocus’ 2nd ranked safety, so he could bounce back, but he’s also going into his age 34 season so his best days are probably behind him.

He may just be a pure box safety and come off the field in base packages for a coverage specialist safety. Tavon Wilson, a tweener defensive back who went in the 2nd round in 2012, could be that safety. He graded out significantly above average on 476 snaps as a rookie. Overall though, the secondary is trending upwards, as is the defense as a whole. They could continue to rank in the top-10 in scoring defense, like they did in 2012, even if they don’t force quite as many turnovers.

Grade: B

Head Coach

Do I really need to say anything about Bill Belichick? He’s the best in the game. No active Head Coach has won more regular season games, won more post-season games, made more Super Bowls, won more Super Bowls, and kept his current job longer. He’ll remain the Patriots’ Head Coach as long as he wants and when he retires he’ll join the 22 Head Coaches currently in the Hall of Fame. He already has more wins than every Hall of Fame Head Coach, with the exception of 5. No Head Coach in NFL history has coached as few seasons as Belichick and won as many games. He also has a chance to be 3rd or 4th all-time in wins when all is said and done. Tom Landry (29 years) is 3rd with 250 wins and Curly Lambeau (33 years) is 4th with 226 wins.

Grade: A

Introduction

The demise of the Patriots is much exaggerated. They still have the Brady/Belichick combination and they still have plenty of supporting talent. This has been the best team in the NFL over the past decade, averaging 12.2 wins per game over the past 11 seasons and, in a parity filled league, they’ve never won fewer than 9 games in a season. They’ll continue to win a bunch of games this season, compete for a 1st round bye in the weaker AFC, and go into the playoffs as one of the favorites for the Lombardi. Once they get there, it will be all about executing, which is something they haven’t done as they were expected to over the past few seasons, but that doesn’t mean they can’t do so this year.

In the regular season, they should win at least 5 games in their weak division again. They’re 16-2 in the division over the past 3 seasons and the division hasn’t gotten noticeably better. Outside of the division, they host Tampa Bay, New Orleans, Pittsburgh, Denver, and Cleveland. Tampa Bay and Cleveland should be easy wins, while New Orleans isn’t a good road team. They’ve lost just 3 home games over the past 3 seasons and they probably won’t lose more than 1 of those games. Worst case scenario, they’re 9-2 through the 11 games I’ve mentioned. They’re road schedule is tougher as they go to Atlanta, Carolina, Houston, Baltimore, and Cincinnati, but I’d be surprised if they lost more than 3 of those games. I think 11-5 is a conservative estimation for them and I have them at 12-4, essentially their average season over the past 11 seasons.

Projection: 12-4 1st in AFC East

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

New England Patriots 2013 Fantasy Football Projections

QB Tom Brady (New England)

The Patriots may pass fewer times and Brady may average fewer yards per attempt this season, as he ages and with his receiving corps on the decline, but he’ll make the best out of what he has and he remains a top level fantasy quarterback. He’s scored an average of 39 times in the last 3 seasons, while throwing an interception on just 1.4% of his throws.

Projection: 4400 passing yards 35 touchdowns 12 interceptions 70 rushing yards 2 rushing touchdowns (311 pts standard, 381 pts 6 pt td leagues)

RB Stevan Ridley (New England)

In his first year as a starter, Stevan Ridley rushed for 1263 yards and 12 touchdowns on 290 attempts last season. The Patriots could run even more this season, missing weapons in the passing game, but still planning on running the NFL’s fastest pace. He has a great offensive supporting cast and should continue to put up big rushing numbers. He just doesn’t give you anything in the passing game.

Projection: 300 carries for 1350 rushing yards 12 total touchdowns 7 catches for 50 receiving yards (212 pts standard, 219 pts PPR)

RB Shane Vereen (New England)

Danny Woodhead is gone so Vereen will take over a bigger role in the running game. Woodhead and Vereen combined for 138 carries last season and Vereen could be around there this year, even before you consider that the Patriots might run more. Vereen is also a good bet to exceed Woodhead’s 40 catches for 446 yards and 3 touchdowns from last season. He is a more talented and explosive back and including the playoffs, he had 15 catches for 254 receiving yards and 3 touchdowns on just 117 pass snaps last season and he’s been lining up all over the formation this off-season and he could be the Patriots’ version of Darren Sproles or Reggie Bush. He could get 200 touches.

Projection: 140 carries for 630 rushing yards 6 total touchdowns 60 catches for 500 receiving yards (149 pts standard, 209 pts PPR)

WR Danny Amendola (New England)

I won’t project Amendola to match the 112 catches Welker averaged per season in New England. Welker’s biggest advantage over Amendola is his sturdiness. Welker missed just 3 games in 6 seasons with the Patriots, while Amendola has played in just 42 of 64 possible games to this point in his career. On top of that, Welker’s greatest talent was his chemistry with Tom Brady and that’s something Amendola might not necessarily have. Welker was never a big touchdown threat either, scoring an average of 6.2 times per season in 6 years. However, he’ll clearly be a big part of the offense should he stay healthy.

Projection: 100 catches for 1100 receiving yards and 6 total touchdowns (146 pts standard, 246 pts PPR)

WR Kenbrell Thompkins (New England)

Thompkins seems to have a strong hold on the starting job opposite Danny Amendola. Ordinarily, it’s very, very tough to trust rookie receivers, especially undrafted rookie receivers, but Brandon Lloyd caught 74 passes for 911 yards and 4 touchdowns as a starter and he didn’t even play that well. There’s a reason he’s unsigned as of this writing. Thompkins probably won’t reach those numbers with Aaron Dobson, Josh Boyce, and Julian Edelman capable of stealing snaps from yet, but he’s absolutely worth a late round sleeper and he’s the other New England wideout to own after Amendola.

Projection: 60 catches for 750 receiving yards and 5 total touchdowns (105 pts standard, 165 pts PPR)

TE Rob Gronkowski (New England)

Sure he’s a major injury risk, but Gronkowski has scored 36 times in his last 35 games. He’s worth his current ADP in the 4th round even if you can only get 10-12 games out of him. Tight end is a deep enough position that you can get by with a TE2 for a few weeks, but it’s thin enough at the top that Gronk could easily lead the position in points per game played, as he has in each of the last 2 seasons.

Projection: 60 catches for 850 receiving yards and 10 total touchdowns (145 pts standard, 205 pts PPR)

TE Zach Sudfield (New England)

Like Thompkins, Sudfield is impressing big time as an undrafted free agent. He might be their #2 tight end behind Rob Gronkowski and he’s capable of playing both the Gronkowski and Hernandez role. With Gronkowski’s uncertainty and Hernandez being in jail, Sudfield is worth a pick as a late round flier.

Projection: 50 catches for 600 receiving yards and 5 total touchdowns (90 pts standard, 140 pts PPR)

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

New England Patriots Potential Breakout Player of 2013: Chandler Jones

The great thing about the NFL is that there are so many positions that every year, there is almost always at least one player who has a breakout year on every team, no matter how good or bad the team is. This is one part in a 32 part segment detailing one potential breakout player for the 2013 NFL season on each NFL team (rookies don’t count). For the New England Patriots, that player is defensive end Chandler Jones.

When the New England Patriots traded up to the 21st pick in the 2012 NFL Draft, it came as a shock to many people as the Patriots are a team known for moving down on draft day, not up. However, when they selected Syracuse defensive end Chandler Jones, most people saw it as a good pick. Jones fit the range and he filled a big need for the Patriots, who lost their two starting defensive ends from their Super Bowl runner up team the year before.

Jones didn’t have a lot of production at Syracuse due to injuries, but his off the charts athleticism sent his stock soaring in the months before draft day. Jones measured in at 6-5 266 with 35 ½ inch arms at The Combine, drawing comparisons to Jason Pierre-Paul. While he didn’t match JPP’s 40 time with a nondescript 4.87, he showed his athleticism with a 35 inch vertical and a 10 foot broad jump. Experts agreed he had the frame to get up to 280-285 comfortably and that while he might not do a whole lot as a rookie, he had a bright future.

Those who considered him a project had to be shocked by how well he came out of the gate in 2012. Through 8 games, heading into the Patriots’ bye, Jones had 6 sacks, 8 hits, and 20 hurries and won Defensive Rookie of the Month in September. He was on pace for 12 sacks, 16 hits, and 40 hurries, which would have put him among the best pass rushers in the league as a mere rookie. He did all this while grading out above average against the run as well. However, injuries again found him. He only missed 2 games the rest of the way, but injuries sapped his explosiveness and he managed just 1 hit and 8 hurries (with no sacks) the rest of the way.

However, with a full year under his belt, Jones still has plenty of potential going into his 2nd year in the league and beyond. He turned just 23 in February and, even after injuries sapped his production, his rookie year still exceeded expectations of those who thought he was a project. He finished the year as ProFootballFocus’ 16th ranked 4-3 defensive end, 18th if you include post-season. If he can stay healthy in his 2nd year in the league, the sky is the limit for him and he could easily have a double digit sack year.

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

New England Patriots extend QB Tom Brady

Tom Brady has agreed to a 3 year 27 million dollar extension. That’s not a typo. For comparison’s sake, Mark Sanchez signed a 3 year 40 million dollar extension last off-season (LOL), while Peyton Manning and Drew Brees respectively signed 5 year 95 million dollar and 5 year 100 million dollar contracts last off-season. If Brady wanted to test the open market, he could have probably gotten 27 million YEARLY. Peyton Manning was offered 25 million per year by the Titans as a free agent last off-season and that was off of 4 neck surgeries. He eventually turned it down for a better opportunity in Denver, but we’re still talking about Brady taking about a 1/3 of his true market value.

This is why Brady is the fucking man. He had two goals out of this contract: he wanted to retire a Patriot and leave on his own terms (this contract will take him through his age 40 season in 2017 and is fully guaranteed) and he wanted the team to have the financial freedom to build a strong supporting cast around him and give him the best chance to win. That’s it. He doesn’t care what he makes. Sure he makes a ton of money through endorsements and through his wife, but most elite level players are just as financially set as he is, but they still want big contracts as a status symbol. Brady just willingly became the most underpaid player in the NFL over the next 5 seasons. Because of this move, the Patriots have 5 more good chances at another ring. I think they get one more.

This extension essentially turns the 33 million over 2 years remaining on his contract into a 5 year, 60 million dollar contract. He’ll make 12 million per year (which is right around Tony Romo and Phillip Rivers money) and free up 7 million in cap space for the Patriots this off-season and 8 million next off-season. From 2015-2017, he’ll remain very, very reasonable priced cap wise, which will allow the Patriots to best build around him. In the immediate future, this deal greatly increases their chances of re-signing Wes Welker, Sebastian Vollmer, and Aqib Talib, along with potential another free agent or two. They will enter free agency with among the most cap room in the NFL, which almost doesn’t seem fair.

In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised at all if Brady agreed to this extension with the promise that the Patriots would use some of the saved money to re-sign Welker, who has caught 561 passes from Brady in 77 regular season games since joining the Patriots in 2007. I’d say there’s at least a 50/50 chance that Welker is re-signed sometime in the next couple of days. That’s an obvious incentive for Brady agreeing to this extension.

Going off of that, not only is this deal an A, but it pretty much assures that every other move they make this off-season will be an A. I was originally lukewarm on the idea of the Patriots bringing back Welker considering his age and how much of his value comes from Brady and the scheme. However, if they bring him back now, they will be doing it to take care of the man who gave them such an unbelievable deal on an extension. How can that be anything other than an A? The same goes for almost any move they can make.

One final point: with Brady being signed through 2017, he is now signed 2 years longer than backup and one time potential successor Ryan Mallett. If Brady does, in fact, play through age 40, Mallett will be in his age 30 season in 2018 when the Patriots’ starting quarterback job finally becomes available. All of a sudden, he doesn’t look like such a young asset and may have more value to the Patriots as a trade chip than anything else.

I think they’d take a 2nd rounder for him if one became available, which it could given the state of this quarterback class, and they might take a 3rd rounder and get their pick back for him. Mallett was a 3rd round pick of the Patriots out of Arkansas in the 2011 NFL Draft. Cleveland is an obvious destination as new VP of Player Personnel Michael Lombardi is a known Mallett supporter from his days as an analyst on NFL Network and is known to be less than impressed with incumbent Brandon Weeden. Cleveland doesn’t have a 2nd round pick after using it on Josh Gordon in the supplemental draft last off-season, but the Patriots could be enticed by their 3rd rounder and a future pick. If Mallett is gone, Tim Tebow and Matt Cassel, two guys who know Josh McDaniels’ system, could be intriguing options as backups in free agency.

Grade: A

[switch_ad_hub]
[switch_ad_hub]
[switch_ad_hub]

New England Patriots 2013 Needs

The Patriots gave it a good run, but they had 40 years of history against them. No team since the 1972 Dolphins has ever won the Super Bowl after losing it the year before. It’s just too physically and emotionally draining to go that far, play that many games, come up short, and then have to try it again. No Super Bowl runner up has even made it back to the Super Bowl since the 1993 Buffalo Bills. There’s a reason I had the Patriots going out in the Conference Championship pre-season. And it’s not just Super Bowl runner ups that have issues. No defending Super Bowl Champion has won a playoff game since the 2004 Patriots. Look at what happened to the Giants. It’s the same reason.

It’s easy to poke holes in Tom Brady’s legacy after what happened against Baltimore and it was bad. I hadn’t seen him legitimately get outplayed by another quarterback in years. That was their biggest defeat since the middle of the 2010 season, their first by even more than 8 points in that time period, and whenever they have lost, it’s almost always been more the defense’s fault than the offense’s. In this game, the two quarterbacks could have switched defenses and the final score wouldn’t have been any different. The Patriots’ defense held out as long as it could, but the offense couldn’t keep them off the field. Tom Brady legitimately looked lost out there, for the first time since maybe the Baltimore loss in the playoffs in January of 2010.

However, Tom Brady still has an NFL record 17 post-season victories and his 17-7 post-season record is superior to Joe Montana’s 16-7. Joe Montana has won 4 Super Bowls and never lost one, but Tom Brady has made 5 in fewer seasons and if you don’t lose in the Super Bowl, it’s because you lost before then. They haven’t won a Super Bowl in 8 years, but no franchise has been as consistent as this one over the past decade. The Patriots will be around again in 2013 and probably for the next few years and another Super Bowl victory would tie Brady for the victory and break the record for Super Bowl appearances, in addition to the post-season wins record he already possesses. In the meantime, they have some obvious holes to fill.

Wide Receiver

Tom Brady didn’t have very good receivers when he won his 3 Super Bowls, but he also had a much better defense. Like any quarterback, Brady is better when surrounded by better receiving talent. Their lack of depth in this area was exposed by injuries, however, as Julian Edelman, Aaron Hernandez, and Rob Gronkowski all missed significant time with injury. Gronk was the biggest loss.

Welker and Brandon Lloyd were their top guys at wide receiver this year, and both stayed healthy this year, but those two will both turn 32 this off-season and Welker is a free agent. Things will only get worse here if Wes Welker is not re-signed and Edelman is also a free agent. Deion Branch saw far too much of the field this season already. At the very least, they need to add a young receiver early in the draft for the future, but they could also use a veteran replacement for Welker if he leaves. They’ve been tied to Percy Harvin, who the Vikings could opt to move if they can’t get him signed long term.

Defensive Tackle

The Patriots have some good pass rushers on the outside, but they don’t get much of anything in terms of pass rush from the inside of their defensive line. Vince Wilfork’s strength is the run and he’s never gotten to the quarterback much, while Kyle Love shouldn’t be anything more than a situational run stopper. Wilfork also turns 32 next season. They need a young pass rushing defensive tackle in the mix and they may also bring back veteran Richard Seymour.

Cornerback

Once again, the Patriots had to go patchwork in the secondary and they ranked 28th against the pass overall as a result. Aqib Talib is now a free agent. I almost don’t want to see them take another defensive back through the draft because they’ve had so many that didn’t pan out. Patrick Chung, Ras-I Dowling, Terrance Wheatley, and Brandon Meriweather were all picked in the first two rounds and didn’t pan out and now they have Tavon Wilson, a 2nd round pick from last year, to wait on. But they have to do something. Alfonzo Dennard looks like a keeper, but as long as McCourty is kept at safety, Dennard is their only good cornerback under contract. They could have interest in Nnamdi Asomugha if the Eagles let him go or they may opt to bring back Talib.

Safety

Same story as cornerback here, they need help and they haven’t had any success early in the draft. Patrick Chung is a free agent, but he barely played down the stretch anyway. Devin McCourty is a keeper at either cornerback or safety, but it looks like it’ll be safety for now. Steve Gregory is alright and Tavon Wilson has some promise, but they still need help here. They’ve been tied to Ed Reed, who is a free agent this off-season.

Offensive Tackle

Sebastian Vollmer is a free agent and will need to be re-signed. If he’s not, I guess Marcus Cannon would get the first crack at the starting job, but they’d need some competition.

Guard

Dan Connolly is the weak link on what was one of the best offensive lines in football this past year. Donald Thomas played really well in limited action in place of the injured Connolly and the injured Mankins this season and he should be the starter in Connolly’s spot, right guard, long term, but he is a free agent.

Punt Returner

Wes Welker and Julian Edelman returned punts for them this season and they did a very good job, but both are free agents.

[switch_ad_hub]
[switch_ad_hub]
[switch_ad_hub]

Baltimore Ravens at New England Patriots: AFC Conference Championship

I’ve gone back and forth on this one. On one hand, some of the reasons I didn’t like the Patriots last week are still true. They’re still a terrible post-season spread team, going 2-7 ATS in their last 9 post-season games and 4-8 ATS all-time as favorites of more than 4 in the post-season. Last year, they were favored by a similar amount in a similar situation here against Baltimore and they failed to cover.

These two teams always play close. They’ve met 6 times since 2007 and only one game was decided by more than 6 points and that was in the Ravens’ favor. The Ravens have endured 4 losses by exactly a field goal to the Patriots in that time period, while the Patriots lost by 1 earlier this year. Joe Flacco matches up perfectly with a New England secondary that can’t defend the deep pass as Flacco goes deep more than any quarterback in the NFL. The Patriots also may be overconfident after scoring so many points last week. Teams are 3-14 ATS since 2002 off a post-season game in which they score 38 or more, though the Ravens did the same thing last week, albeit in less convincing fashion.

On the other hand, Joe Flacco has put together two straight good post-season games, but he’s incredibly inconsistent and might not be able to come through a 3rd time. He’s actually 7-4 in the post-season in his career, but he only completes about 53% of his passes as he’s always relied on a strong defense until this year. This year, he doesn’t have a strong defense, but he’s stepped up. He’ll have to do it again this week if the Ravens are going to compete. Tom Brady will get his and if Flacco doesn’t play well, they won’t have much of a chance. Flacco generally struggles on the road, where he’s just 4-6 SU (4-6 ATS) in his career off a road win.

They may also be exhausted after last week’s double overtime marathon. Teams are just 1-7 since 2002 on normal rest in the post-season off an overtime game when their opponent is not coming off an overtime game. Meanwhile, the Patriots play very well in same-season revenge games, going 11-3 ATS in this spot under Bill Belichick, though 9-0 ATS in the regular season inside their crappy division and just 2-3 ATS in the post-season.

Finally, the Ravens are a publicly backed underdog. Publicly backed underdogs rarely cover because it creates a slighted favorite. The Patriots might not be getting their true respect this week and have plenty of bulletin board material. Besides, something fishy may be going on with publicly backed teams this post-season, as both the Broncos and Patriots had several borderline calls go against them last week. The odds makers didn’t do as well as they normally do this season, so a conspiracy theorist might say they are trying to make up for it this post-season.

At the end of the day, I’m taking the Patriots. You’ve heard the old adage, when in doubt, take the points. In the post-season, I prefer, when in doubt, take the better quarterback. I especially like that when it means fading a publicly backed underdog. I’m definitely not confident about this one though. I’m just looking forward to a great game.

New England Patriots 31 Baltimore Ravens 20

Pick against spread: New England -8 (-110) 1 unit

[switch_ad_hub]
[switch_ad_hub]
[switch_ad_hub]

Houston Texans at New England Patriots: Divisional Round Pick

The Patriots blew out the Texans in Foxborough a few weeks ago so they’ll definitely blow them out again right? Well that seems to be what everyone thinks as, in spite of this ridiculous spread, the public is all over the Patriots. How ridiculous is this spread? Well, two weeks ago in the Patriots’ last game, they were favored by 10.5 over the Dolphins. Now they’re favored by 9.5 over the Texans? The Texans are 1 point better than the 7-9 Dolphins? Huh?

I love fading the public whenever it makes sense. The public always loses money in the long run. Odds makers are rich for a reason. Once again, I disagree with the public here. Just because the Patriots blew out the Texans last time, doesn’t mean they’ll do so again. This is a different game. In fact, the Texans may even have an edge because the Patriots might be overlooking the Texans a little bit here because of that game (and an impending showdown with the Broncos). Meanwhile, the Texans will use that as extra motivation.

Here’s an example: Boston sports writer Dan Shaughnessy joked that the Patriots were getting two bye weeks in a row, which Arian Foster turned into his Twitter avatar. Side note: I’m a Patriots fan, I was going to take Houston +9.5 anyway because it should be the right side, but when I found about what Shaughnessy said and Foster’s reaction to it, I was terrified (as a fan, for New England’s sake) because Shaughnessy always jinxes New England area sports teams. He’s not the only one. NBC’s Tony Dungy said that the Texans didn’t have a chance.

There’s a trend that sums the Texans revenge factor. Since 1989, teams are 8-4 ATS in the postseason trying to avenge a same season loss of 21 or more. The Patriots famously lost in this exact same situation a few years ago to the Jets. The Texans have the extra motivation. The Patriots might be overconfident. And this spread is out of control. Going off that trend, teams are 26-12 ATS in same season, same site, non-divisional revenge games since 1989.

The Patriots also tend to struggle as big favorites. They are 7-12 ATS as favorites of more than a touchdown since 2010, including that Jets loss. That’s crazy considering they are 23-9 ATS in all other situations. Whenever they have big expectations and are expected to blow teams out, they tend to disappoint a little and play closer games. Brady is also 1-7 ATS in his last 8 postseason games and 3-8 ATS all-time as a favorite of 4.5 or more in the post-season. I’m not going to pick the Patriots to lose or anything (they are 15-4 SU as favorites of more than a touchdown since 2010), but this game will be close, closer than people think. I’ll gladly take the points.

New England Patriots 27 Houston Texans 23

Pick against spread: Houston +9.5 (-110) 3 units

[switch_ad_hub]
[switch_ad_hub]
[switch_ad_hub]

New England Patriots: Wild Card Round Power Rankings (#1)

It’s 2006 again. Tom Brady and Peyton Manning appear to be on a crash course. Both quarterbacked arguably the best teams in the league (the Broncos and Patriots ranked 2nd and 3rd in the NFL in DVOA, but I don’t trust #1 Seattle on the road). Both are MVP candidates. Peyton Manning is currently viewed as the favorite, but I think that’s both undeserved and beneficial to the Patriots. I went into the former in Denver’s write up and I’ll get into the latter here.

The Patriots thrive when doubted and that’s exactly what’s happening with the Broncos taking the #1 seed. They’ve failed to finish in the last 2 seasons as the #1 seed, but this year, I think things will be different. Tom Brady has an impressive record as an underdog in his career, going 24-18 and he’ll almost definitely be an underdog in Denver when the two meet. He also has an incredibly impressive record against teams with a record better than his, going 26-11 in those games in his career.

Add in his 9-4 career record against Peyton Manning and I think the Patriots are the AFC favorite right now in a two team race. Winning the Super Bowl once they get there will be harder, as they are 0-2 against NFC playoff teams this year (AFC division winners are 0-6 as a whole against NFC playoff teams this year), but I like the way the Patriots match up against the NFC teams they could have to play. I think they’re better than Atlanta and Green Bay and would win rematches with Seattle and San Francisco as the former struggles away from home and the latter is playing with their best defensive player at less than 100%. Tom Brady also possesses a 10-3 record in same season revenge games.

[switch_ad_hub]
[switch_ad_hub]
[switch_ad_hub]

Miami Dolphins at New England Patriots: Week 17 NFL Pick

Miami Dolphins (7-8) at New England Patriots (11-4)

I can’t handicap week 17 games like I do other games (maybe that’s a good thing because I’ve had a rough few weeks), because one of the things I do is look for upcoming distractions and dynamic changes on their schedule. In week 17, I can’t do that, so instead I have to look at what this game means do these two teams. The Patriots can move into a first round bye here with a win if Houston loses (not completely unlikely) and actually into the #1 seed with a Houston loss and a Denver loss (pretty much completely unlikely). Meanwhile, with a loss, Baltimore could jump them (assuming they beat Cincinnati) and New England could end up as low as 4th.

Obviously, there’s a lot at play for the Patriots, but most of it will be played out before this game even happens. If Houston wins and Baltimore doesn’t in the 1 PM block, the Patriots will be locked into the #3 seed barring a Denver loss as 16 point favorites against the Chiefs (translation, they’re the #3 seed). However, even if Denver gets up big against Kansas City early, the Patriots will not pull their starters. They always go full out for these week 17 games, even the meaningless ones (which this one isn’t completely). Belichick is 9-2 ATS on week 17.

Besides, this team desperately needs a tune up before the playoffs as their last two games have featured a home loss and a “closer than it should have been” game in Jacksonville as 14 point favorites. However, even with last week’s game, the Patriots have no shortage of blowout wins on their schedule, winning 6 games by 21 or more this season and I think it’s very doubtful that Belichick allows the team to have 3 bad games in a row. Since 2008, they’re 6-2 ATS off of back-to-back non-covers, including a 45-7 win against the Rams earlier this year. This situation reminds me a little bit of that. They lost to the Seahawks and then barely beat the Jets, but bounced back in that 3rd game in a huge way.

We’re also getting plenty of line value with the Patriots, more than last week as this line has moved from -12 to -10 because of the Patriots’ less than stellar showing in Jacksonville and because of some unfounded speculation that this game won’t mean anything to the Patriots (even if it technically doesn’t, they won’t care). The calculated line using the net points per drive method is New England -13, with the Patriots 1st in net points per drive and the Dolphins being 15th.

My concerns and reasoning for not making this a significant play are threefold. The first is that the public is all over New England and they always lose money in the long run. The second is that I just generally don’t like laying more than a touchdown in a significant play. The third is the Patriots’ less than stellar ATS record as home favorites of more than a touchdown over the past 3 years. They are 5-9 ATS in that situation, pretty crazy considering they are 24-12 ATS in all other situations over that time period. Still, I like the Patriots this week. I also once again like the over as Patriots’ game, especially in the 2nd half of the season and in the division, tend to go over.

Public lean: New England (70% range)

New England Patriots 31 Miami Dolphins 17

Pick against spread: New England -10 (-110) 2 units

Total: Over 46 (-110) 1 unit

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

New England Patriots: Week 17 NFL Power Rankings (#2)

Last week: 2 (+0)

Record: 11-4

Net points per drive: 0.99 (1st)

DVOA: 33.7% (3rd)

Weighted DVOA: 35.9% (3rd)

Studs

SS Patrick Chung: Allowed 1 catch for 5 yards on 5 attempts, 2 interceptions, 1 pass deflection, 6 solo tackles, 2 stops, 1 penalty

ROLB Dont’a Hightower: 4 solo tackles, 1 assist, 4 stops, 1 sack on 3 blitzes, allowed 3 catches for 31 yards on 4 attempts, 1 pass deflection

LE Rob Ninkovich: 7 quarterback hurries on 41 pass rush snaps, 3 solo tackles, 1 missed tackle

Duds

RG Dan Connolly: Allowed 1 sack, 1 quarterback hit, and 2 quarterback hurries on 46 pass block snaps, run blocked for 2 yards on 1 attempt

C Ryan Wendell: Allowed 3 quarterback hurries on 46 pass block snaps, run blocked for 17 yards on 5 attempts

WR Deion Branch: Caught 2 passes for 12 yards on 3 attempts on 23 pass snaps, 1.5 YAC per catch

TE Aaron Hernandez: Caught 1 pass for 13 yards on 4 attempts on 38 pass snaps, 12.0 YAC per catch, 1 drop, 1 penalty

DT Vince Wilfork: 2 quarterback hurries on 52 pass rush snaps, 2 penalties, 1 solo tackle, 1 penalty

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]

[switch_ad_hub]